Then counter my arguments. But you can't because I'm right. I told you the Seahawks were overrated on Defense and explained why their stats were exaggerated. What happened? Brady exposed them. Or do you not think they were exposed?
I told you about some of the uncalled penalties that were weird they weren't called. The obvious roughing the kicker and the helmet to helmet. Both because the NFL is trying to take a stand on safety. Which made it even odder they weren't called. Google both and there are big discussions on both.
I watch the game from a view of an educated fan. The problem with you is that NE fans are generally well educated on our teams. It's funny, I generally like to visit our opposing teams ESPN blogs to read up on their teams prior to us playing them. And I'm always amazed how terrible some of the blogs are. Whereas our ESPN blogger Mike Reiss is amazing. He gives us great analytics on our team and competition. (Check out the blog and tell me you disagree.) It's no wonder he's our blogger because that's what our fan base appreciates. Because we take our sports seriously.
You might want to go check out some of those blogs and get your football IQ up.
The General public dislikes sports fans? Geez, you really sound silly, like someone who's never played sports.
You have zero perspective outside of your superfaness. You aren't so much a sports fan, as you are a NE fan.
Again, here you are complaining about penalties that weren't called--only the penalties against NE, nevermind the pushoff at the goal line that gave Amendola the TD or the tripping on first down pass that should have been a 15 yarder for the Seahawks late in the 4th quarter.
I don't go to any fan forums, because fan sports talk boards are generally filled with drooling idiots. You've got to have the acumen of a ground squirrel to think there is any salient information coming from these people.
This explains you.
"Brady exposed them!"
How, what does that mean? You never said a FUCKING THING other than "Brady exposed them." That doesn't mean shit, but you aren't concerned with data or relevant observation.
Here is what you could have said: "Seattle's vaunted defense relies on a big, tough secondary that is quick, but designed to defend against large receivers. The small size of Amendola and that other short dude match up well against Seattle's secondary."
Brady didn't "expose them," you sockpuppet. NE simply matches up well against their scheme. That is it. End of story.
people fucking love that word: "haha! they were exposed in that one game, finally! I always told you they were overrated!" hahahha
OK, sure, your buddies win by 4 points on some shit play call in the final seconds and suddenly they dominated the game and exposed their opponents throughout.
you're a fucking idiot, and everyone here knows that.