**Updated 9/9** New 2006 Civic on sale TODAY

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,776
31
81
Overall, it still can't hold a candle to the Mazda 3S in terms of interior design, fit, and finish.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,647
27
91
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Overall, it still can't hold a candle to the Mazda 3S in terms of interior design, fit, and finish.

w3rd
 

fbrdphreak

Lifer
Apr 17, 2004
17,556
1
0
Holy sh!t the nose of that car is FUGLY. i thought the Si's looked okay, and maybe they do, but the regular Civics look like sh!t.

Oh, and that fvcking cluster design is STUPID. WTF WERE THEY THINKING????
 

clickynext

Platinum Member
Dec 24, 2004
2,583
0
0
It's really not bad. Sure, not the most beautiful thing they could have created, but it is unique and it does look like a quality car with a nice interior and if that fuel economy is what you really get from it in practical application then it's great!
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
8
0
Originally posted by: NFS4
For 2006, all Civic Sedan and Civic Coupe models are powered by a Single Overhead Cam (SOHC) 1.8-liter inline four-cylinder design with 16 valves, a new version of i-VTEC, and a dual-stage intake manifold. The engine produces 140 horsepower @ 6300 rpm (up from 127 horsepower at 6300 rpm, EX trim level), 128 lb-ft. of torque at 4300 rpm (up from 114 lb-ft. @ 4800 rpm, EX trim level)

Emissions / Fuel Economy

* Estimated EPA fuel of 30/40 city/highway (automatic transmission)
* Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle-2 (LEV-2)

:Q:Q:Q:Q:Q

Yep if dealers don;t price them to high I see them moving very well with 30MPG in the city. Even if gas does come down a bit, i don;t think exxon (or any other oil copmpnay) will let them come down to much now that they have a taste for EXTRA profit.

 

mwtgg

Lifer
Dec 6, 2001
10,491
0
0
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: NFS4
For 2006, all Civic Sedan and Civic Coupe models are powered by a Single Overhead Cam (SOHC) 1.8-liter inline four-cylinder design with 16 valves, a new version of i-VTEC, and a dual-stage intake manifold. The engine produces 140 horsepower @ 6300 rpm (up from 127 horsepower at 6300 rpm, EX trim level), 128 lb-ft. of torque at 4300 rpm (up from 114 lb-ft. @ 4800 rpm, EX trim level)

Emissions / Fuel Economy

* Estimated EPA fuel of 30/40 city/highway (automatic transmission)
* Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle-2 (LEV-2)

:Q:Q:Q:Q:Q

Yep if dealers don;t price them to high I see them moving very well with 30MPG in the city. Even if gas does come down a bit, i don;t think exxon (or any other oil copmpnay) will let them come down to much now that they have a taste for EXTRA profit.

I heard gas prices will be down to pre-Katrina levels around October/November, for what it's worth.
 

FreshPrince

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2001
8,363
1
0
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: NFS4
For 2006, all Civic Sedan and Civic Coupe models are powered by a Single Overhead Cam (SOHC) 1.8-liter inline four-cylinder design with 16 valves, a new version of i-VTEC, and a dual-stage intake manifold. The engine produces 140 horsepower @ 6300 rpm (up from 127 horsepower at 6300 rpm, EX trim level), 128 lb-ft. of torque at 4300 rpm (up from 114 lb-ft. @ 4800 rpm, EX trim level)

Emissions / Fuel Economy

* Estimated EPA fuel of 30/40 city/highway (automatic transmission)
* Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle-2 (LEV-2)

:Q:Q:Q:Q:Q

Yep if dealers don;t price them to high I see them moving very well with 30MPG in the city. Even if gas does come down a bit, i don;t think exxon (or any other oil copmpnay) will let them come down to much now that they have a taste for EXTRA profit.


Did they double the tank? if not, then that's nothing because you'd have to fill up twirce as much...and that's a hassle sometimes.

co-worker bought into the high mpg crap, but hates his civic now because he fills up twice as much per week, which sucks.
 

jbWHO

Member
Mar 30, 2002
159
0
0
saw the car in person today.

it looks good from side but front view is fugly! (just can't get use to that H mark...too big!!!)

IMO too much of radical design change.

...but i'm sure i'll see tons of civics running around here in columbus ohio soon.
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,048
18
81
Fugly.

Id take a Mazda3 over that sh!t any day. Half the reason some of you freaks think it is decent...is purely the fact that its a Honda.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,843
9,092
136
So rumor has it the European version (hatch) may come stateside as the new CRX??? Any chance this is true? If it is, I might know which car I'm getting after I graduate b-school!
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Fugly.

Id take a Mazda3 over that sh!t any day. Half the reason some of you freaks think it is decent...is purely the fact that its a Honda.

Considering the auto industry is transitioning HP rating to a 3rd party audited process, and the fact that mazda overrated two engines in the past 5 years, maybe you should wait until mazda puts out audited HP numbers before you buy a mazda.
 

TuffGuy

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
6,478
0
76
Originally posted by: jbWHO
saw the car in person today.

it looks good from side but front view is fugly! (just can't get use to that H mark...too big!!!)

IMO too much of radical design change.

...but i'm sure i'll see tons of civics running around here in columbus ohio soon.
Really? I think that it looks really odd from the side too, but I can't put my finger on it. The doors look too high, the front is kind of blunt/flat, and that C-pillar is funky. I'm sure that it's aerodynamic/slippery, but it looks odd...

http://www.technogeeky.com/06_civic_side.jpg
 

jbWHO

Member
Mar 30, 2002
159
0
0
Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Originally posted by: jbWHO
saw the car in person today.

it looks good from side but front view is fugly! (just can't get use to that H mark...too big!!!)

IMO too much of radical design change.

...but i'm sure i'll see tons of civics running around here in columbus ohio soon.
Really? I think that it looks really odd from the side too, but I can't put my finger on it. The doors look too high, the front is kind of blunt/flat, and that C-pillar is funky. I'm sure that it's aerodynamic/slippery, but it looks odd...

http://www.technogeeky.com/06_civic_side.jpg


just looks odd cuz front end is so short, plus angle of incline(?) from front hood to windshield is really steep.

i wonder how safe this new civic is, that having really short front end kinda scares me.

added: maybe it isn't that short...but dunno something looks odd
 

CTrain

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2001
4,940
0
0
Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Originally posted by: jbWHO
saw the car in person today.

it looks good from side but front view is fugly! (just can't get use to that H mark...too big!!!)

IMO too much of radical design change.

...but i'm sure i'll see tons of civics running around here in columbus ohio soon.
Really? I think that it looks really odd from the side too, but I can't put my finger on it. The doors look too high, the front is kind of blunt/flat, and that C-pillar is funky. I'm sure that it's aerodynamic/slippery, but it looks odd...

http://www.technogeeky.com/06_civic_side.jpg


You sure do love to pimp your Ralliart.
Actually i do like the car alot and would consider it if only the front end looks like the Evo.
They changed the headlights and it looks fugly.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |