- Apr 25, 2004
- 1,988
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Aelius
This is what I'm talking about. I'm claimed to have no critical thinking yet here we have claims that perhaps they made a mistake in reporting which building fell down. They repeat over and over that it is the Salomon Brothers Building. Not just her mind you but the anchor as well, long before she comes on the air.
All of this is dismissed and you people wrongly point to the woman as having perhaps made a mistake.
Obviously you people either did not watch the longer videos available or simply do not have 2 brain cells to rub togeather.
Neither does anyone else here think for one second about the CNN broadcast that mentioned the same thing 65 minutes before the building fell.
A lot of you mention thinking or critical thinking. For that to occur you would actually first need to take into account the information before dismissing it out of hand. Obviously that was just too difficult for any of you.
Having debated with some of you before I'm not shocked.
Look man, here's the deal. Is it strange that both networks would do that? Sure. The thing is, that the evidence against a conspiracy vastly outweighs the evidence for one. The practical difficulties in creating a conspiracy of that complexity, of that size, to conceal a crime that enormous, without a single person having a crisis of conscience for killing 3,000 people is incredibly unlikely.
It is far, far more likely that mixed reports coming from other people led to confusion in a situation like that. If you can find me a single conspirator, or a single document, then maybe we can talk. Until then... I will make fun of you.
Sibel Edmonds if proof. sorry eskimospy, you lose.
Able Danger is proof the US. government ordered military officers to stand down from the 9/11 hijackers.
The pakistani government wired the lead 9/11 hijacker $100,000 yet the US government turns the other cheek
What the hell does that person have to do with a conspiracy to destroy the world trade center? Did she plant any bombs in there? Did she know anyone who did? Did she help hijack anything? Covering up documents that show your agency screwed up has NOTHING to do with that whatsoever. I asked for someone in on that conspiracy. So... still waiting.
You're a tad...slow. Learn to make a connection?
You want the people who planted the bombs to come forward? That's like asking for the numerous snipers who shot at JFK to come forward LOL. What are you thinking?
In other news, more evidence of BOMBS that were planted in the towers:
Bombs in the WTC (5 minutes)
Eyewitness testimonies and audio recorded numerous large detonations before the towers came down :thumbsup: Funny, even the FBI thought devices brought down the towers.
You still haven't explained why they would leak something to the press that they don't want anyone to find out.
And you still haven't explained how in the world such a mass cover up is even possible. You guys are looney.
Leak = Script
They screwed up the script. The CIA ran False Flag ops all over the world long before 9/11. Sad to say this but they tend to work very well. They have some very good people who do this for a living. The list just goes on and on. The US overthrew a lot of nations with elected bodies. Democratic even.
So it's not that they want to leak this info, but rather someone screwed the pooch.
Even if you dismiss ALL of this the single question that remains is who told them. The media such as the BBC and CNN don't necessarily have to be party to any of this. They simply get fed a story and they report it like clock work. How that came about in this case is what I would like to know.
Nowhere did I say or suggest they have directly involvement in a cover up as it occured. After the fact is a different story and that's up for debate (primarily with the BBC claiming they lost/destroyed the tapes and made an error in reporting).