[updated site 27-3]Some TA SETI history ,stats from late 1999 on,another 4mths added

[Assimilator1]

13 Assimilator1.......................... 15

Wow!,that means I was outproducing you in days gone by! ,that didn't last long I bet [update]about 2mths!
Funny to see I was in the Top 20 for quite some time! ,*yorkshire accent*them were the days

oops,found another stats date was missing!

Also found the highest ever ranking I've had in TA production!

12 Assimilator1.............................. 19.1
lol

Now I manage this ,

55 ??.. 27.7 ?.. Assimilator1 - Team AnandTech
Yet again shows how much better TA is doing nower days

Seems you passed & matched me in the week 9-16 to 9-23 & then carried on pulling away as my output nearly halved!

 

[theNorse]

<bump>

 

[Assimilator1]

Thanks

Just added another 4mths of stats

 

[Smoke]

My Seti Birthday (week)

Some of my "Rookie Class". :_

Andrew Williams........ 2701 * Obviously had done Seti previously
Ryan Wilson............... 857 * Obviously had done Seti previously
Dark Majiq.................. 321 * Obviously had done Seti previously
OrByte......................... 84
mazdanut..................... 25 (Gone)
Smokeball.................... 20
IcecreamLtDan.............. 11
bobafett32...................... 9
xraymongral................... 7 (Gone)
Jinx............................... 3
Footman........................ 1
sammoth....................... 1
(#2)............................... 0 (Who knows)
superles........................ 0 (Gone)
chaotic.......................... 0

 

[theNorse]

"Deserves a <bump>
norse

 

[Assimilator1]

Yeah I was going to look for that ,I haven't yet added 'names joined' for those last 4mths of threads I've added.

I must admit the only other names I recognised was Dark majiq & Icecreamdan.
Whose AW & RW?

 

[theNorse]

<bump>
norse

 

[BadThad]

Damnit Assim1, you just cost me an hour! hehehehehe

Sniff, sniff....brings a tear to my eye looking at stats when we had just over 200 members....lol.

Thanks bro!

 

[zodder]

I thought SETI was for geeks way back then.

 

[Assimilator1]

BT
lol ,I've got 2002 stats to add yet,not to mention some more random DC threads

Zodder
So does that mean its no longer for geeks or you are a geek now? hehehe



Btw I added another 2mths stats last night ,some new links & some more 'members joined' names

 

[lane42]

Thanks for the cool stuff A1

9-30 - 10-7 2000, new member, gregg mccausland = Lane42, hint, hint

 

[Assimilator1]

Ah ha thats who he is!

That was there all along

 

[lane42]

 

[Assimilator1]

hehe ,wasn't really

 

[MGallik]

GAAAAAAAA!

I'm losing ground!

Heheh

 

[Assimilator1]

Hi mate!,good to see you about again

Have you got those P4 rigs you were talking about?

 

[MGallik]

Yes, I do. But not the Springdales. I decided to just "get it done".
I bought,3 each, P4 2.66/533's, P4PE mobo's with 512 Crutial DDR CMX 2700LL AND
Finally going to Win XP. I have 1 machine up so far, but still running Win98se, the
rest will be up by Monday. Sometime in the 3rd quarter of "04" I'll go to Prescots (spell?).

ColinP was an original Team member too by the way.

I was Number 1 with 3 wu's a day for a few weeks. Heheh
I was running 3 166MMX Pentiums with 64 megs and 540 meg hdd's!
A year before, I had a Pentium 100 and a Pentium 90.

 

[theNorse]

<bump>

 

[Assimilator1]

Mgallik
What are springdales anyway?
P4PE is that the single channel RAM chipset?
Nice rigs anyway ,I expect to see you higher in the weekly stats

If I were you I'd stick with Win 98SE

Awesome fleet you had to begin with

 

[MGallik]

Springdales and Caterwoods are the new, 800Mhs chipsets for the P4.

P4PE is the Single channel DDR333 Asus boards for the P4. A few ideas
on optimum settings for a mild OC would save me a bit of time. 2.8Ghz
shouldn't be too hard. I got the wrong memory, (2.5 3 3 7), and wont
get the "good" stuff, (2 2 2 5), for a few more days.

Looks like a WU takes 4:30 with no oc, the "slow" memory timings, and
Win98se.

Why stick with Win98se? I keep hearing how "wonderful"(sic) XP is.
I assume I can strip most of the cycle wasteing crap out of it. The NT/2000
kernal should be more stable than 98, I would think...

 

[Assimilator1]

That's true ,I just hope you don't have ay old h/wr or sft/wr to go on those XP boxes though

Here's a site for getting rid of the junk out of XP & win2k

I also forgot that XP doesn't have the massive slow down with VLAR WUs that Win9x does.

Keep us posted
Btw I have Crucial PC2700 & I have it running at 178MHz CAS 2.5-2-2-6 ,not bad