US considering use of Nuclear Weapons

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
They're not going to use any nukes. There is no reason to, and even if there were, they would not be hasty to use them. No nukes have been used in war since Nagasaki, and they are not about to set a new presedent.

just invites them to be used on us.
 

piku

Diamond Member
May 30, 2000
4,049
1
0
There is nothing you can do with nukes you can't do with lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of normal bombs.
 

crabbyapple1

Banned
Sep 10, 2001
345
0
0


<< I vote for some well placed neutron bombs. >>


i would love to see a neutron bomb go off. amazing what it does. too bad about the geneva convention through.....
 

reitz

Elite Member
Oct 11, 1999
3,878
2
76
Nowhere in the article does it state that the US is considering the use of nuclear weapons. It simply lists potential options that the military could use, according to military experts.
 

Zwingle

Golden Member
Jan 1, 2001
1,925
0
0


<< No nukes have been used in war since Nagasaki, and they are not about to set a new presedent..... >>


umm....Nukes were not used in Nagasaki...., those were atomic bombs, very different than nukes, and if nukes had been used, a precedent would have already been set. You can only set a precedent once.
 

Unclemo

Banned
Apr 1, 2000
967
0
0
neutron bomb is a good idea. only an idiot would send troops to go in there to get killed.
Anyone that states we are better off to send in troops and suffer large casualities (or any amount of casualities) better be one of those going in or should shut the hell up.

Neutron bomb I believe has little explosion and rapidly decays so that we could send in troops in a matter a few weeks... and all the bad guys would be dead waiting for us! I guess we would have the crappy job of burying them.. Big earth movers will make that easy. I luv those big CATS.
 

kamiam

Banned
Dec 12, 1999
2,638
0
0


<< Our greatest weapon is diplomacy with maybe a touch of doughplomacy >>

leave it to moonbeam
/kamiam shakes his head:frown:
 

Zwingle

Golden Member
Jan 1, 2001
1,925
0
0
Atomic bomb....atoms are split.
Results:
The short-term and long-term effects of atomic explosions on human health have been studied on survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. Radiation and radioactive fallout affect those cells in the body that actively divide (hair, intestine, bone marrow, reproductive organs). Some of the conditions (short- and long-term) include:

nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea
cataracts
hair loss
loss of blood cells
These conditions often increase risks of:
leukemia
cancer (e.g., stomach, liver, colon, bladder, breast, ovaries, thyroid, skin)
infertility
birth defects including growth and mental disorders
Scientists and physicians are still studying the survivors of the bombs dropped on Japan and expect more results to appear over time.

Nuclear bomb...the nucleus of atoms are split...much greater damage.....long and short term.

In the 1980s, scientists assessed the possible effects of nuclear warfare and proposed the theory that a nuclear winter could occur. In the nuclear winter scenario, the explosion nuclear bombs would raise great clouds of dust and radioactive material that would travel high into Earth's atmosphere. These clouds would block out sunlight. The reduced level of sunlight would lower the surface temperature of the planet and reduce photosynthesis by plants and bacteria. The reduction in photosynthesis would disrupt the food chain, and that would cause mass extinction of life, including humans. This scenario is similar to the asteroid hypothesis that has been proposed to explain the extinction of the dinosaurs. People who believed in the possibility of a nuclear winter pointed to the clouds of dust and debris that traveled far across the planet after the volcanic eruptions of Mount St. Helens in the U.S. and Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines.

Nuclear weapons have incredible, long-term destructive power that travels far beyond the original target. That's why the world's governments are trying to control the spread of nuclear bomb making technology and materials and to reduce the nuclear weapons that were deployed during the Cold War.

Anything else? Same theory....but nukes have more destructive power, if we were to use nukes in Afganistan....no one would be living there for some time....well, past my life time and my childrens lifetime....and the radiation cloud created could blow anywhere the wind takes it....and poison those in the way. Nukes will not be an option to the US...unless they don't care about killing thousands (millions?) of innocent people, which would make the US as bad as the terrorsist.





 

Unclemo

Banned
Apr 1, 2000
967
0
0
there is nothing wrong with killing millions of people there. they don't matter and we would be able to feel safe again.
damn, kill em all.
I hope all of you are planning on going over there if we have to send in troops. Sending in troops and fighting convention warfare will be bloody and horrific. We would be better of just being their bitch for the rest of time.
Let's crap all over there sand box.
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81


<< Atomic bomb....atoms are split.

Nuclear bomb...the nucleus of atoms are split...much greater damage.....long and short term.
>>



really?

what part of the atom is split when you split the atom in an atomic bomb? omg you gonna bombard them with high energy electrons that get absorbed by the atmosphere?

there are various types of nuclear weapons, the ones dropped on japan WERE NUCLEAR WEAPONS. they were just not as high yield as some hydrogen bombs. of course there is the neutron bomb.
 

HombrePequeno

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2001
4,657
0
0


<< there is nothing wrong with killing millions of people there. they don't matter and we would be able to feel safe again. >>



Stupid, stupid, stupid.

Zwingle:

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the atomic bomb split uranium or plutonium? Looking at the definition of a nuke in dictionary.com it says nuke is a nuclear device. Since the atomic bomb used nuclear fission, it qualifies as a nuke.
 

SinMen

Golden Member
Oct 31, 2000
1,136
0
0


<< there is nothing wrong with killing millions of people there. they don't matter and we would be able to feel safe again. damn, kill em all. >>


Is this Osama Bin Laden speaking? Or are there millions of terrorists? Killing the terrorists is one thing; killing innocent civilians (like kill them all) makes us the terrorist.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |