Do you have any idea on what the critical mass is of a nuclear weapon? This wont change and it is something that somebody cant carry around in a suitcase.
if you can fit half a dozen missiles in a single shipping container, you can fit a single nuke or single dirty bomb.
so in you opinion anybody who doesn't agree with the administration is automatically a liberal? less than 12 months ago i was a republican until i saw the truth. what i am against is wasteful spending.
You think detonating 9 nuclear weapons to take out one is a better idea than the current one? ROTFLMAO!
that is why i said, republicans don't care about the ocean anyway. there are no houses there, hence they went about testing atomic bombs on atoll island and such for decades. its really the dolphins and 3 eyed fish that pay the price.
but what is more probably and cost effective? to hit a missile with another missile both travelling 5,000-10,000MPH. or to nuke a missile where the nuke only has to be within a mile or quarter mile radius. by far 1000x easier.
Lets just make sure your house is downwind from the fallout and we can call it even.
i don't have a house floating in the middle of the ocean.
the supposed scenario entails that a single incoming missile is a nuke, therefore if it hits, we have nuclear fallout over our heads vs having nuclear fallout in the middle of the ocean, much like an atomic test.
to top it off, russians say they already have a missile that can defeat NMD, (most likely by zig zagging). hence the only way to destroy that is to nuke it. NK can figure out how to make their missiles zip zag if they can figure out how to make nukes