US seriously considering nuking Iran!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

xSauronx

Lifer
Jul 14, 2000
19,586
4
81
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Originally posted by: Malak
When a country wants to develop nuclear weapons, no diplomatic comprimise will ever be made, period. Only a fool would think there were a peaceful solution. Hell, try to take nukes away from America and look how pissy they would get.

So how come Japan still exists? How come we are great allies and they are an economic power?

what the hell?
 

jadinolf

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
20,952
3
81
Originally posted by: m2kewl
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12225188

The report also says the U.S. military is seriously considering the use of a tactical nuclear weapon against Iran to ensure the destruction of Iran?s main centrifuge plant at Natanz.
:shocked::shocked:

we may be the only country with excuses to use the bomb twice! i swear by the time GW leaves office, we're going to fight the entire middle east


so this is how the world ends....

Sounds good to me.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,862
84
91
if only the un weren't a bunch of immoral pussies. china and russia can't be relied on. the europe keeps pretending the un is a forum of wise men. iran needs active sanctions put on them. the un nations should build a mass of cruise missles and just bombard the f*ckers economic and military targets until they give in. just use as many cruise missles as it takes. i'd be fine with that. but the world has a habit of appeasing horrible and arrogant countries like iran and nazi germany until its too late.
 

cross6

Senior member
Jun 16, 2005
508
0
0
LOL Does anyone else see the HUGE IRONY hear?


Nukes are bad and countries can't have them - so to stop them...........WE NUKE THEM.
 

totalcommand

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2004
2,487
0
0
i thought i'd write in before the lock -

i'm a liberal, but Iran is a REAL threat to us, and to stability in the Middle East. it's shameful that we attacked Iraq, and now don't really have the resources to attack Iran and hold Iraq at the same time. not to mention, if we attack Iran, they have terrorist cells set up everywhere, and would probably respond with several 9/11s.
 

Smackem

Senior member
May 23, 2005
357
0
0
Iran has been the real threat all along. It was pretty convienant that saddam had definite evidence of WMD (according to the administration)
 

Conky

Lifer
May 9, 2001
10,709
0
0
I think this is the USA's way of saying "This is what you get if you attack Israel".

Oh, and wrong forum.

 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,806
46
91
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
For a price I'd do about anything except pull the trigger
For that I'd need a pretty good cause
Then I heard of Dr. X, the man with the cure
Just watch the television... Yeah, you'll see there's something going on

Got no love for politicians, Or that crazy scene in D.C.
It's just a power mad town
But the time is ripe for changes, There's a growing feeling
That taking a chance on a new kind of vision is due

I used to trust the media to tell me the truth, tell us the truth
But now I've seen the payoffs everywhere I look
Who do you trust when everyone's a crook?

Revolution calling, Revolution calling, Revolution calling you
[There's a] Revolution calling, Revolution calling
Gotta make a change, gotta push, gotta push it on through

I'm tired of all this bullshit they keep selling me on T.V. About the communist plan
And all the shady preachers begging for my cash
Swiss bank accounts while giving their secretaries the slam

They're all in Penthouse now or Playboy magazine, million dollar stories to tell
I guess Warhol wasn't wrong fame fifteen minutes long
Everyone's using everybody, making the sale

I used to think that only America's way, way was right
But now the holy dollar rules everybody's lives
Gotta make a million doesn't matter who dies

Revolution calling, Revolution calling, Revolution calling you
[There's a] Revolution calling, Revolution calling
Gotta make a change, Gotta push, gotta push it on through

I used to trust the media to tell me the truth, tell us the truth
But now I've seen the payoffs everywhere I look
Who do you trust when everyone's a crook?

Revolution calling, Revolution calling, Revolution calling you
[There's a] Revolution calling, Revolution calling
Gotta make a change, Gotta push, gotta push it on through


~REVOLUTION CALLING
Music and Lyrics by Geoff Tate & Michael Wilton

Queensryche and Operation Mindcrime FTW!
 

Firsttime

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2005
2,517
0
71
Originally posted by: cross6
LOL Does anyone else see the HUGE IRONY hear?


Nukes are bad and countries can't have them - so to stop them...........WE NUKE THEM.

While I see your point, the US wouldn't nuke Iran because it had nukes. I mean lots of countries have nukes. The US would nuke Iran because Iran would most likely do something to harm the US or one of its major allies with its nukes.

 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: Malak
Why not pull out the freakin MOAB, I want to see it in action!

meh, the MOAB is nice and big and all, but it has no use right now. I am sure we have used it before but it can't do anything in crowded civilian areas since it has a wide cone of damage. its mostly for large clearings where a lot of units are gathered.
and for the record, its Massive Ordinance Air Burst, used to describe how it functions. detonates before impact, much like the atomic bombs did, and spread the damage below in a much larger area than if it hit land and detonated. it has less damage though than even the earliest nuclear weapons. (it uses 9 tons of H-6, which has an RDX base, which is slightly more powerful than TNT).
apparently there is a 13ton version out there too.

and btw, i dont see the US ever using nukes again. If we nuke Iran, we would likely see China and North Korea enter the mix, not to mention the retaliation of Iran.
a nuke in the middle east would be the worst thing we could ever, and probably ensure the downfall of America in every way possible, military first. We should have no way of ever saving ourselves from China and North Korea, and throw in Iran and other countries and that would spell destruction.
we would attack them, I don't doubt that, but with smart conventional weapons.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Probably just small atomic weapons for bunker busting purposes, im sure they are not going to waste a Moscow Special on them.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: Firsttime
Originally posted by: cross6
LOL Does anyone else see the HUGE IRONY hear?


Nukes are bad and countries can't have them - so to stop them...........WE NUKE THEM.

While I see your point, the US wouldn't nuke Iran because it had nukes. I mean lots of countries have nukes. The US would nuke Iran because Iran would most likely do something to harm the US or one of its major allies with its nukes.

well as a country we want who has nukes to be the only ones with nukes. we really only have nukes anymore to use as a numbers game.. a 'we have more nukes than you, so don't touch us with nukes or you will be decimated' type of thing. we dont want other countries gaining nuclear capabilities because its a weapon none of the world wants to see again, and the wrong countries getting their hands on them could mean disaster. i mean, even if a country that doesn't have a problem develops nukes, those nukes could easily fall into the hands of the wrong people either through government/military corruption, terrorists, or simply that country handing them to other countries. the whole middle east is at suspect for that last one. most of the middle east would like to have their hands on nukes, and I wouldn't see most of those countries ever practicing self control by not launching them when in a conflict. they are pointless for they are too destructive and reach beyond what any country should ever do to another. there are means of destroying a country's political regime, thats the means of war. war should never extend to the destruction of innocent lives that are not apart of the regime.
 

Praxis1452

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,197
0
0
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Originally posted by: Malak
When a country wants to develop nuclear weapons, no diplomatic comprimise will ever be made, period. Only a fool would think there were a peaceful solution. Hell, try to take nukes away from America and look how pissy they would get.

So how come Japan still exists? How come we are great allies and they are an economic power?

because we nuked them... and then they surrendered so we said no you can't do this/that etc... so they didnt' and focused on their economy instead of arms
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,862
84
91
Originally posted by: newParadigm
Originally posted by: Malak
Why not pull out the freakin MOAB, I want to see it in action!

MOAB?

mother of all bombs?

would be nice, but its not a cruise missle. i think the un should just have active sanctions aka stream of cruise missles for as long as it takes to wipe that smile off irans face. u know they laugh at the sanctions now, so hammer their ports, military and economy until they figure out the world is serious. course not gonna happen since euros are pussies with their heads in the sand, russia and china are amoral economic opportunists who don't give a sh*t.
 

everman

Lifer
Nov 5, 2002
11,288
1
0
Originally posted by: newParadigm
Originally posted by: Malak
Why not pull out the freakin MOAB, I want to see it in action!

MOAB?

moab wouldn't do crap to reinforced underground bunkers, it's an air burst weapon design to take out ground troops. The nukes in reference are bunker busters, they are fired into the ground, where they detonate in hopes of knocking out the bunkers. (by bunker we're talking about large armored facilities)
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |