UT2003 Demo benchies?

[MIGhunter]

Who's problem are you referring to?

My problem didn't go away with the updated drivers. Although I just downloaded the patch and UT2003 runs better. I haven't tried earth and beyond yet.

 

[SupermanCK]

sorry for the confusion MIGhunter...
so i guess new driver didn't solve it? driver 6166 right?
patch out already...geez...i am slow...

 

[oldfart]

If you want to set up the game to run in max quality settings like the benches (maybe more), modify your UT2003.ini file:

[WinDrv.WindowsClient]
ScreenFlashes=True
NoLighting=False
MinDesiredFrameRate=35.000000
Decals=True
Coronas=True
DecoLayers=True
Projectors=True
NoDynamicLights=False
ReportDynamicUploads=False
TextureDetailInterface=UltraHigh
TextureDetailTerrain=UltraHigh
TextureDetailWeaponSkin=UltraHigh
TextureDetailPlayerSkin=UltraHigh
TextureDetailWorld=UltraHigh
TextureDetailRenderMap=UltraHigh
TextureDetailLightmap=UltraHigh
TextureMaxLOD=0
TextureMinLOD=0
NoFractalAnim=False
ScaleHUDX=0.000000

[D3DDrv.D3DRenderDevice]
DetailTextures=True
HighDetailActors=True
SuperHighDetailActors=True
UsePrecaching=True
UseTrilinear=True
AdapterNumber=-1
ReduceMouseLag=True
UseTripleBuffering=False
UseHardwareTL=True
UseHardwareVS=True
UseCubemaps=True
DesiredRefreshRate=100
UseCompressedLightmaps=True
UseStencil=False
Use16bit=False
Use16bitTextures=False
MaxPixelShaderVersion=255
UseVSync=False
LevelOfAnisotropy=1 <----increase this for a higher level of Anisotropic filtering
DetailTexMipBias=0.800000
DefaultTexMipBias=-0.500000
UseNPatches=False <-------for the ATI guys
TesselationFactor=1.000000
CheckForOverflow=False
DecompressTextures=False
UseXBoxFSAA=False
DescFlags=0
Description=

 

[SupermanCK]

what's NPatches?

 

[oldfart]

NPatches is ATI TrueForm. I'm not sure if it is working in the demo since I dont have an ATI card. Try it out.

 

[MIGhunter]

There is a patch for the ATI Radeon 9700.

There is also a patch for UT2003.

 

[THUGSROOK]

thx for the tips oldfart!

 

[Dug]

OUCH!!!

Try Oldfarts recommendations and turn everything to UltraHigh
Run a team deathmatch with 16bots.
Do a ~ for console and type stat fps
Watch your fps while running around

Look at wallet-- because you'll want to upgrade.

My P4@2.8Ghz and Geforce4 @ 300/650 isn't cut'n it.


This is at 1280x960 btw

 

[SupermanCK]

HEE HEE...i will try that tonight...hee hee...2.8GHz+ and Radeon9700

 

[THUGSROOK]

benchmark results... (gf4 ti4600, 30.82)

1024x768
D3D mode
flyby: 169.5
botmatch: 71.6

1280x960
D3D mode
flyby: 119.2
botmatch: 67.1

1600x1200
D3D mode
flyby: 80.4
botmatch: 55.9

 

[oldfart]

No Kidding. Crank everything up and it will slow down even the best systems out there. I haven't had the time to go through each option to see what effect it has on graphic quality and framerate. I do know that my system doesn't seem as fast as it did a week ago!

This has been a good week for demos. NOLF2 demo came out today. Just downloaded it and am checking it out. Some very nice looking graphics in that one as well.

 

[DannyDiplo]

There's no point setting texture detail to ultra-high as the demo didn't ship with the hi-res textures anyway (to make it a viable download; check the readme!) The hi-res textures are HUGE, which explains why the full game will be a 3GB install

 

[MIGhunter]

Here are my benchmarks including alternate resolutions. I thought that it would go down a lot more than it did.

1024x768
Flyby: 200.307907
Botmatch 70.652313

1280x960
Flyby: 163.704193
Botmatch 70.252090

1600x1200
Flyby: 156.627594
Botmatch 66.996689

 

[JSSheridan]

My scores for an Asus P3V4X with P3 @ 807*, 115FSB, 512MB PC133, and a ATI Radeon 8500 LE @ 275*/275*
All of the game's detail and physics options are on their highest, for the demo, setting.

800x600
Flyby: 69
Botmatch: 25

1024x768
Flyby: 69
Botmatch: 25

1280x960
Flyby: 64
Botmatch: 24

Curious results, but near the bottom none the less. About what can be expected with a system that meets minimum specs, but not recommended specs.

 

[mechBgon]

1024 x 768, with 1 processor, 2 video sensors, 2 audio sensors, 2 hands. Mild overclocking, using coffee:

Godlike: 2 times :Q
Unstoppable: around 10 times
Dominating: oh, maybe 20 or 30 times, depends on the opponents
Rampage: "lots"

Oh... and the computer itself is hitting around 20-24fps in gameplay with an intelligent selection of options. GeForce2 GTS-V on Duron 1000MHz/K7S5A combo. Gets the job done.

I also wanted to throw in a couple of discoveries while I'm at it:

• What comes after "M-M-M-Monster Kill?" LUDICROUS Kill!
• What comes after "Godlike?" Heh heh... "Wicked SICK!"

Both of those discoveries were admittedly made while playing against Novice bots. For the LUDICROUS Kill, I had 32 Novice-level bots and just kept telefragging them.

 

[XBoxLPU]

D3D

1600X1200

FlyBy: 73
Botmatch:55

1024X768

FlyBy: 160
Botmatch:60


AMD XP 2000+ @ 2200 ( 187 FSB, 178ghz ). 512 Ram. Abit KX7-333
Visiontek GF4 4400 @ 285/660. 30.82 drivers

 

[MustangSVT]

mine seems kinda low..

Flyby :58.7
Botmatch: 36.6

1024x768

Athlon XP 1600+ @ 1542mhz (i think m/b is the limit *k7s5a*)
Geforce3 ti200 @240/530
256ddr 2100

hmm what's odd is .. i set cpu speed back @ 133mhz and it still gets almost same numbers..
tested @147mhz in sandra and all the numbers are correct with 1800+ speeds...

oh well its working..

 

[zodder]

Compared to some of the others, this seems kind of low. I'd like to see a few more AMD folks post here to see how it compares:

Flyby :133.42
Botmatch: 51.89

1600+ @1817 (11.5 x 158)
8KHA+
TI4200 (275/545) Det 40 drivers

Hmmmm......

 

[boi]

Originally posted by: mechBgon
1024 x 768, with 1 processor, 2 video sensors, 2 audio sensors, 2 hands. Mild overclocking, using coffee:

Godlike: 2 times :Q
Unstoppable: around 10 times
Dominating: oh, maybe 20 or 30 times, depends on the opponents
Rampage: "lots"

Oh... and the computer itself is hitting around 20-24fps in gameplay with an intelligent selection of options. GeForce2 GTS-V on Duron 1000MHz/K7S5A combo. Gets the job done.

I also wanted to throw in a couple of discoveries while I'm at it:

• What comes after "M-M-M-Monster Kill?" LUDICROUS Kill!
• What comes after "Godlike?" Heh heh... "Wicked SICK!"

Both of those discoveries were admittedly made while playing against Novice bots. For the LUDICROUS Kill, I had 32 Novice-level bots and just kept telefragging them.

hahaha, the last one is "Holy Sh*t" I haven't got higher than that, lol

 

[krypto1300]

I had to re-register because my email changed, so please don't mind my newbe status.

Fly-By : 140.24 fps
Bot-Match: 57.56 fps

By the way rez was 1024x768.

 

[PhoenixOfWater]

D3D no FSAA no AF

1024X768
Flyby:114.29
Botmatch:43.26

800X600
Flyby:119.98
Botmatch:43.69

640X480
Flyby:120.42
Botmatch:43.71

CPU: P3T 512K 1.2@1.35Ghz(9X150)
Video Card: ATI 8500 128MB (306/306)


It looks like the flyby use more of the video card and the botmatch uses more of the CPU...

 

[SupermanCK]

what was the default setting for texture again? i changed all to ultrahigh...but i want to check if there are any difference...

 

[THUGSROOK]

default setting for everything was "normal".

 

[GtPrOjEcTX]

are you all reporting the framerates or the scores?

I'll just copy paste it all then... for my PNY TI4600 on a P4 1.6a OC @ 2.1 w/ 512mb of PC2700 samsung.

all at 1280 X 1024 X 32bit.

16.060820 / 37.068012 / 69.906410 fps -- Score = 37.069569 otmatch-antalus

38.029533 / 75.027878 / 377.690125 fps -- Score = 75.047905 flyby-antalus
37.070126 / 75.044556 / 249.246841 fps -- Score = 75.061218 flyby-antalus
37.473454 / 75.025093 / 257.538696 fps -- Score = 75.042564 flyby-antalus

27.849361 / 73.161690 / 141.625351 fps -- Score = 73.184372 botmatch-anubis

24.058662 / 55.445660 / 118.154587 fps -- Score = 55.478851 botmatch-asbestos
56.541714 / 132.228622 / 431.262421 fps -- Score = 132.323257 flyby-asbestos

26.100271 / 93.145576 / 241.701904 fps -- Score = 93.299866 flyby-citadel

 

[THUGSROOK]

GtPrOjEcTX ~ please use the BENCHMARK.EXE program in your UT2003Demo\system\ dir.