UT2003 Demo benchies?

[LarryJoe]

Visiontek GF3 (original @220/520)
Det 40.41
Run with P4 system at 2.4, RDRAM at 480

1024x768
D3D
Flyby 109.2
Botmatch 58.7

Will turn the system up to 2.667 and report back to see if it makes a difference. My guess is no as the GF3 has reached it's limit.

LJ

 

[LarryJoe]

Originally posted by: Bartman39
Visiontek GF3 (original @230/545)


D3D
Flyby 101.9
Botmatch 61.2


Will do Open_GL later...

Bartman - nice OC on that GF3. I have the same card. Is yours still with stock cooling? Any probems at that speed? I never tried higher than 225/525, maybe I'll try to push it to your level.

 

[alkemyst]

UT2003
D3D
Flyby: 110.216743
Botmatch: 41.052994

OPENGL (stuff open though, 2 explorers, aim, ssh...i was working)
Flyby: 109.087059
Botmatch: 40.608456

System:
Tualatin Celeron 1.1A@1.42GHz
Abit BX6R2.0 (BX Chipset)
512MB PC133 SDRAM
Radeon 8500 128MB 300/300

 

[ErikaeanLogic]

1024x768
D3D
flyby: 211.4
botmatch: 74.2

1600x1200
D3D
flyby: 127.6
botmatch: 70.3

New system, burn-in still in progress.

 

[THUGSROOK]

anybody notice that the players in UT2k3 look like Buzz Lightyear? (from toy story)

 

[oldfart]

anybody notice that the players in UT2k3 look like Buzz Lightyear? (from toy story)

Yeah, they do seem a bit overly armored. The bots in Unreal were pretty skinny, UT looked normal, and UT2003, oversized. UT2003 has a very Q3TA look and feel to it IMO.

BTW, did you try out [ H ] OCP's UT2003 benchmark? They tweaked the .ini files to not compensate for different card types. Its is a more apples to apples test. The only thing is they built the files so they only work if UT2003 is installed in the default c:\UT2003demo directory (mine isn't). I guess I can edit all the files to fix that or just edit the regular ini files to reflect the changes that were made.

 

[THUGSROOK]

to infinity! ~ and beyond!

UT2k3 would be better if it was antigrav ships fighting and not mechppl.
(like the Descent PyroGX)

 

[IceT]

Leadtek GF3 TD (stock), 40.71, max setting @ 1024*768 (AMD 1.2, 768MB PC133)

Flyby: 93.09
Botmatch: 33.28

 

[oldfart]

I tweaked the files to reflect my UT2K3 directory, and the benches work fine.

There is a lot of bench info to post though. You run 3 batch files one at a time to run through all the tests. One batch is High quality, one medium, one low. Each of those run 3 different flyby maps at 3 different resolutions, 1600 x 1200, 1280 x 1024, 1024 x 768. The whole thing will produce 27 sets of scores. Be sure to use the install.bat for each of the 3 quality level before you run the flyby.bat

I'm just posting the High quality results:

1600 x 1200
dm-antalus
34.542313 / 50.783306 / 190.091797 fps
Score = 50.807461

dm-asbestos
38.610954 / 91.179893 / 303.048859 fps
Score = 91.207703

ctf-citadel
38.770920 / 78.344727 / 210.791733 fps
Score = 78.415329

1280 x 1024
dm-antalus
51.849369 / 72.120285 / 255.750168 fps
Score = 72.126724

dm-asbestos
48.021999 / 125.074715 / 447.656342 fps
Score = 125.147087

ctf-citadel
51.472664 / 102.028046 / 276.665558 fps
Score = 102.196320

1024 x 768
dm-antalus
77.391487 / 111.782021 / 524.910217 fps
Score = 111.810585

dm-asbestos
73.566147 / 176.598190 / 499.238342 fps
Score = 176.749496

ctf-citadel
51.690159 / 126.422844 / 330.617615 fps
Score = 126.671860

 

[ndee]

Can someone maybe take a screenshot of the Ultra-high settings?

 

[MustangSVT]

Originally posted by: ndee
Can someone maybe take a screenshot of the Ultra-high settings?

yes i wanna see it too

and i still dont understand my super low scores ..

XP @ 1.73 with geforce3 @ 245-544

and still @ 1024x768 i only get

flyby:60.03
Botmatch : 36.6

hmm vertical syncs are off.. i guess ill try open gl.

 

[SupermanCK]

Originally posted by: MustangSVT

Originally posted by: ndee
Can someone maybe take a screenshot of the Ultra-high settings?

XP @ 1.73 with geforce3 @ 245-544

ever thought geforce3 could be your drawback???

 

[Toymaker]

1024x768

Flyby = 171.62
Botmatch = 68.99

I like UT and UT2003 is cool too...

congrats on the awesome system MIGhunter

 

[CraigRT]

flyby = 141 fps
botmatch = 58 fps

Ti4200 128mb @ 315/560 - detonator 40.72
and Athlon XP1800+ stock speed
512MB PC2100 DDR @ 266MHz

 

[MustangSVT]

Ever compare my score with other gF3 scores?

just look at larry's on top of this page.

Originally posted by: SupermanCK

Originally posted by: MustangSVT

Originally posted by: ndee
Can someone maybe take a screenshot of the Ultra-high settings?

XP @ 1.73 with geforce3 @ 245-544

ever thought geforce3 could be your drawback???

 

[SupermanCK]

well...he has p4 2.4 with rdram...
what driver are you using? det40? or 30?

 

[MadTom]

Compared with the other results mine seem very odd. Maybe someone can explain this to me. BTW, haven't used the generic UT2003.ini. Will try this later on.

Here we go (all at 1024x768):
D3D:
Flyby: 44.940525
Botmatch: 32.768734

OpenGL:
Flyby: 44.940220
Botmatch: 32.769997

My system is:
P4 1.6A@2.14
512MB Samsung PC2700 at 354MHz, 2-3-2-6
GeForce3 Ti200@ 220/500 with Detonators 40.72 (the Ti200 goes even higher - 225/520 at least)

And strangely - D3D & OpenGL results are almost similar...

Have to play with this ini file...

 

[Nucro]

Celeron@1330 , 8500LE@295/295
1024*768 32 Bit

Flyby: 109,8
Botmatch: 39,9

 

[MadTom]

I retested my system under Win98SE and suddenly:

Flyby: 111.x
Botmatch: 55.x

(writing the results out of my head...)

Much better then the results I got under WinXP Pro SP1 (see my post before)... I used the same 40.72 drivers, with the difference that the Ti200 was clocked at 225/500 (220/500 under XP). As I have no fallbacks under XP while playing other games, and even my 3DMark scores are higher under XP - compared 9215 to 9045 I really don't understand this...

Anybody having any clue?

 

[MadTom]

MustangSVT - which Windows are you using? I mean, just look what happened with my results.

 

[MustangSVT]

Originally posted by: MadTom
MustangSVT - which Windows are you using? I mean, just look what happened with my results.

hmmmm!!!!

that's quite interesting!! its kind of odd, i dont have any problems with other games going over 60fps but thats what it seems like.
hmmmmmm.... maybe ill install 98 on this ! good find madtom!

 

[MadTom]

Update - got same good results (Flyby around 110 and Bothmatch around 55) under WinXP when going over to 30.82 Detonators. So it's probably a driver issue.

I guess the 30.82 drivers will stay there till a new WHQL certified driver comes out...