Value Proposition of Pascal Titan X

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

alcoholbob

Diamond Member
May 24, 2005
6,271
323
126
What's interesting is I'm hearing alot of outlets saying they don't have review copies yet. This might be a paper launch that has such low supply they can't even get review copies in...or maybe the overclocking is really bad on this card and they don't want reviews out until after the card has built up sufficient pre-orders. Tin foil hat
 

x3sphere

Senior member
Jul 22, 2009
722
24
81
www.exophase.com
The questions is when? The trend in the past has been for Nvidia to release a cheaper card very close in performance to the Titan (780 and 980Ti) within a few months of the Titan. But they had some good competition from AMD at the time as well. I'm crossing my fingers that AMD will knock one out of the park with Vega, but if that doesn't happen, we could be waiting until 2018 for a card substantially faster than the 1080 for less than $1000.

It will hinge on the sales of this new Titan as well. Remains to be seen how the $1200 price point goes over with people. There's a big gap between 1080 and this card, and if this one doesn't sell as well it would make sense for them to slot in say a $800-900 Ti card before AMD responds.

It's probably wishful thinking on my part that this Titan doesn't sell as well, but I've actually seen a lot of people on forums that bought these before saying they are going to hold out this time. But who knows, maybe they will still budge in the end.
 
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
If you want a "value" card from NVIDIA buy a GTX 1060/1070. If you want speed and don't care so much about price, get a GTX 1080 or, better yet, a Titan X.
 

garagisti

Senior member
Aug 7, 2007
592
7
81
I agree, from an enthusiast perspective I don't know why anyone would pay 75-85% of the Titan X value when there are faster AIB 980Tis and now the 1070/1080 cards. If you check the completed ads on Ebay, there were quite a few that sold for $750-900 in the last few weeks.

If the resale value of the Titan line isn't as strong as I've been thinking, I don't want to risk losing $500-600 in 1.5yrs. I can afford it but my inner Scrooge won't let me do it.

So basically we have to hope for a miracle with Vega in the next 6-8 months or that Nvidia will still release the 1080Ti even if AMD doesn't bring a worthy competitor to the table. Sounds like I may have this 980Ti for awhile. (#firstworldproblems).
Rumours are there will be 2 Titans, one now based on GP102 & a refresh with GP100, and the latter supposedly may come with HBM2. So yeah, if you buy one now and have another launch in that time-frame you own it, the resale just wouldn't be there. Not just that, the pascal refresh, will probably bring GDDR5x throughout the range, or so the rumour bit at wccftech said in the article about Titan.

Best to wait for 1080ti/ Vega.
 

garagisti

Senior member
Aug 7, 2007
592
7
81
If you want a "value" card from NVIDIA buy a GTX 1060/1070. If you want speed and don't care so much about price, get a GTX 1080 or, better yet, a Titan X.
How dare the peasants enter a discussion about Nvidia & value. lol

Let me get out of the way sire.
 

HiroThreading

Member
Apr 25, 2016
173
29
91
T'was but in AMD handled poorly.



And they seem in no rush to gain any. Which boggles my mind.



Some of it? They axed ATI because "AMD is a stronger brand name" eyah sure. My loyalty basically ended there.

AMD was racing to the bottom even before Bulldozer. Not sure if you were around during that forum invasion marketing tactic of "buy a dual core, unlock third even fourth core!" It was almost on every tech forum I visited. That is not how you build perception/brand.



Thus this product is not for you.

Epic marketing and management failure on AMD's part to axe the ATI name.

They knew that the AMD brand was heading downwards due to Conroe, Penryn and Nehalem. I mean, do you remember the disaster that was the Quad-FX "Spider" platform?

And they must have known early on that Bulldozer was a dud architecture around the same time that they knew that RV770 was an amazing architecture. The GPU team continued to churn out great designs: Cypress, Cayman and then of course GCN. So why tarnish their image by erasing the ATI name -- a brand which many casual PC gamers know and like -- and plastering the AMD logo everywhere?

Again, it just baffles me how silly AMD's marketing and management are.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
The one thing good about the Titan brand is you get a high end, large die chip early on with high Vram amounts. The Titan will last the length of the whole Pascal generation and well into the next generation because you will have enough Vram to carry you. Of course the downside is the price. I don't understand why a Titan would hold a good resale value with more capable and cheaper cards out later.
If you want a good performer near the top of the Pascal generation that will last throughout in terms of performance and Vram, then the Titan is the only option. I do expect faster Pascal chips to come out, but buying the Titan X now will probably give you something near the top of this gen or close enough. Its that price though. If you aren't concerned about the premium then I'm sure you will enjoy the card.
 

iiiankiii

Senior member
Apr 4, 2008
759
47
91
I blame AMD partially for this mess. Serioiusly. I mean it. This is a perfect example when having no competition ends up hurting the consumers. Nobody is there to keep them in check. AMD literally have no answer to the Titan XP until next year. I don't know how they're going to catch up. AMD better hope DX12/Vulkan becomes widely adopted soon.

The crazy thing is this. Not too longer ago, (before Kepler), the FLAGSHIP GPU was within reach. I was the targeted market. That $500-600 price range was doable. Now, we get this? $1200 for a CUT-DOWN chip? Now, we have to settle with for a x60 product for $600? This is not a good direction for us consumers.

From a business perspective, kudos to Nvidia for being able to pull this off. Shame on AMD for a poorly run business. What a vicious cycle AMD is stuck in. They can't compete because they have no money. They have no money because they can't compete. Sucks for us all.
 

Bacon1

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2016
3,430
1,018
91
I blame AMD partially for this mess. Serioiusly. I mean it. This is a perfect example when having no competition ends up hurting the consumers. Nobody is there to keep them in check. AMD literally have no answer to the Titan XP until next year. I don't know how they're going to catch up. AMD better hope DX12/Vulkan becomes widely adopted soon.

The crazy thing is this. Not too longer ago, (before Kepler), the FLAGSHIP GPU was within reach. I was the targeted market. That $500-600 price range was doable. Now, we get this? $1200 for a CUT-DOWN chip? Now, we have to settle with for a x60 product for $600? This is not a good direction for us consumers.

From a business perspective, kudos to Nvidia for being able to pull this off. Shame on AMD for a poorly run business. What a vicious cycle AMD is stuck in. They can't compete because they have no money. They have no money because they can't compete. Sucks for us all.

Its AMD's fault because people blindly pay whatever NVidia charges?

Stop buying the product. Its not mandatory or in any way "needed". It is purely a nice to have item. Have some self control and don't pay outrageous prices for technology and they'll stop selling it at those prices.
 

HiroThreading

Member
Apr 25, 2016
173
29
91
Its AMD's fault because people blindly pay whatever NVidia charges?

Stop buying the product. Its not mandatory or in any way "needed". It is purely a nice to have item. Have some self control and don't pay outrageous prices for technology and they'll stop selling it at those prices.

He said "partially" -- and he's right.

Your protests are petty -- the great majority of PC gamers don't visit these forums or read every page of an anandtech review article. They just go ahead and buy the best.

Nvidia of course gets the majority of the blame for jacking up prices. But why does AMD have no answer to GP100 and GP102? There's simply no excuse to not foreseeing the importance of GPUs in the HPC space. Nvidia are laughing all the way to the bank.
 
Last edited:

sirmo

Golden Member
Oct 10, 2011
1,014
391
136
He said "partially" -- and he's right.

Your protests are petty -- the great majority of PC gamers don't visit these forums or read every page of an anandtech review article. They just go ahead and buy the best.

Nvidia of course gets the majority of the blame for jacking up prices. But why does AMD have no answer to GP100 and GP102. There's simply no excuse to not foreseeing the importance of GPUs in the HPC space. Nvidia are laughing all the way to the bank.
AMD cards have great compute, but those opportunities are far and few in between.. also CUDA being a proprietary vendor lockin kind of prevent AMD from entering that space in a lot of ways.

They are however working on CUDA -> OpenCL cross compilers but that stuff doesn't happen overnight.

Your point about people just buying Nvidia.. even the supposed "informed" on these forums can't agree on the fact that AMD is worth considering when it comes to buying a new GPU, about a third would probably be glad to see AMD exit the GPU market.
 
Last edited:

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
I blame AMD partially for this mess. Serioiusly. I mean it. This is a perfect example when having no competition ends up hurting the consumers. Nobody is there to keep them in check. AMD literally have no answer to the Titan XP until next year. I don't know how they're going to catch up. AMD better hope DX12/Vulkan becomes widely adopted soon.

The crazy thing is this. Not too longer ago, (before Kepler), the FLAGSHIP GPU was within reach. I was the targeted market. That $500-600 price range was doable. Now, we get this? $1200 for a CUT-DOWN chip? Now, we have to settle with for a x60 product for $600? This is not a good direction for us consumers.

From a business perspective, kudos to Nvidia for being able to pull this off. Shame on AMD for a poorly run business. What a vicious cycle AMD is stuck in. They can't compete because they have no money. They have no money because they can't compete. Sucks for us all.

AMD doesn't make anyone buy it. Don't buy it and they'll stop doing it. It's not like all of a sudden other cards get slower.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
AMD doesn't make anyone buy it. Don't buy it and they'll stop doing it. It's not like all of a sudden other cards get slower.

People buy it because people want it. They proved they want it, because they buy it and the market supports it. There is plenty of performance to be had spending less money on mid range cards even at 1440 moderate settings. It's like any thing else out there. People don't need Bugatti Veyrons when a Chevy Corvette is still a lot of fun for way less, but that doesn't stop those who can buy a Veyron from buying a Veyron.

The market it what it is. This is the product of what buyers want, and will spend on any given product. If the market didn't support this, it wouldn't exist.
People going around saying, "Just don't buy it and it will stop" are dreaming like Bernie. You don't have to buy a TitanX. You buy what you can afford. And thankfully, these days, buying what you can afford can net you a great experience at any level. 1060/480 all the way up to wherever you can manage.
Enough of this don't buy it and they'll stop crap. We are way far beyond that ever happening, if we ever were in the first place. People want these things.
So they are here.
 
Last edited:

boozzer

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2012
1,549
18
81
How dare the peasants enter a discussion about Nvidia & value. lol

Let me get out of the way sire.
you peasants should be paying 100$ just for the look of the shroud! you should be thankful it isn't 200$!!! :twisted:
 

DooKey

Golden Member
Nov 9, 2005
1,811
458
136
There's no such thing as "value" on a halo card especially if you use the current meme of AT forums.
 
Last edited:

Mondozei

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2013
1,043
41
86
I find it tempting to buy 1 or 2 Pascal Titan X's and immediately flip them on Ebay for a profit. Spending $1200 for my entertainment would make me feel cheated. The $999 OG Titan left the same bad taste in my mouth.

Coincidentally, a buddy of mine is still using his OG Titan that he bought around the GTX 780 release. He even plays the latest games. Although he is at 1080p, I find it interesting to hold onto that Titan for so many years. Do you think he got his money's worth? I don't. Having owned the R9 290, I consider that a far superior product when it comes to gaming performance and ability.

He still thinks his Titan runs circles around my old R9 290 Tri X simply due to brand perception. That is why the Titan holds its value so well. Its performance isn't the main reason people want one. Being a Halo product lets the Titan enjoy a high resale value. Nvidia is doing really well at making the Titan seem like a card with a long shelf life, even if a comparable AMD card comes out at a cheaper price.

This. You cut right to the heart of it. Titan's resell value is a lot about brand perception. The truth is that their actual value has always been terrible. The Ti cards have destroyed them.

OP: better wait for the 1080Ti to come out and counter Vega or buy Vega outright if it is competitive.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
how can you blame AMD?

this is incredible.

so if 486/pentium price was high, it was Cyrix's fault?

How can you blame AMD? Easy they dont have a competitor in performance to the 1080, much less Titan/1080 Ti, and wont for a long time. Or is that somehow nVidia's or the consumer's fault?

And as others have posted, I dont blame consumers for paying the "nVidia tax", especially since there is zero competition in the high end from AMD. There is so much angst in these forums about evaluating every card to the nth degree for performance per dollar, but in the grand scheme of things, paying a 4 or 5 hundred dollar premium for a top of the line product is relatively minor in comparison to what you can pay for a fancy house, luxury car, fancy watch, family vacation, and on and on.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
How can you blame AMD? Easy they dont have a competitor in performance to the 1080, much less Titan/1080 Ti, and wont for a long time. Or is that somehow nVidia's or the consumer's fault?

And as others have posted, I dont blame consumers for paying the "nVidia tax", especially since there is zero competition in the high end from AMD. There is so much angst in these forums about evaluating every card to the nth degree for performance per dollar, but in the grand scheme of things, paying a 4 or 5 hundred dollar premium for a top of the line product is relatively minor in comparison to what you can pay for a fancy house, luxury car, fancy watch, family vacation, and on and on.

Very well said. I could not agree more..
 

alcoholbob

Diamond Member
May 24, 2005
6,271
323
126
how can you blame AMD?

this is incredible.

so if 486/pentium price was high, it was Cyrix's fault?

Pc was a niche market back then and it was a market trying to take away market share from Macintonish mostly so there was a strong incentive to lower prices.

The other thing is Nvidia is completely fabless, wheress at least Globalfoundries has an contractual arrangment with AMD. Nvidia has to fight Apple and ARM and everyone else for wafers. They cant simple decide to "increase production to lower costs" because they are simply provided an invoice per die that thet have no control over.
 

Bacon1

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2016
3,430
1,018
91
People buy it because people want it. They proved they want it, because they buy it and the market supports it. There is plenty of performance to be had spending less money on mid range cards even at 1440 moderate settings. It's like any thing else out there. People don't need Bugatti Veyrons when a Chevy Corvette is still a lot of fun for way less, but that doesn't stop those who can buy a Veyron from buying a Veyron.

The market it what it is. This is the product of what buyers want, and will spend on any given product. If the market didn't support this, it wouldn't exist.
People going around saying, "Just don't buy it and it will stop" are dreaming like Bernie. You don't have to buy a TitanX. You buy what you can afford. And thankfully, these days, buying what you can afford can net you a great experience at any level. 1060/480 all the way up to wherever you can manage.
Enough of this don't buy it and they'll stop crap. We are way far beyond that ever happening, if we ever were in the first place. People want these things.
So they are here.

So its not AMD's fault then obviously, if people will buy it regardless.
 

know of fence

Senior member
May 28, 2009
555
2
71
Nvidia is pretty consistent in their raising of prices, by about 200 dollars.
the 1080 is a 500$ Card, sold for 700, when compared to the other first gen card on 28nm (GTX 680 IIRC). Titan OG was "a cool grand".

The 670 launched for 400 dollars (1070 is +50 $), the 660 launched for 230 $ (1060 FE is +70 $). Is it inflation, or is it the fact that these cards can clock to 1.5x of the competition, use 1/2 of the energy in idle and have a pretty good driver track record.

These cards launch and prices decline to about half within a generation, basically x amount of time to get your value out of them. We probably won't see a 4-5 year node cycle this time, but we also won't see 16ff gains next time around.

Card usefulness at those prices is tied to resolutions you are running, 4K single monitor is obviously pointless, multi monitor and "multi projection" depend on dev support.

 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
I see the argument here that Titan is a luxury product and thus, should not be judged on performance per $ like every other piece of PC hardware.

That's Apple's line of marketing. Their stuff is luxury, pay the luxury tax and be happy about it!

For people doing car analogies, luxury sports cars are still damn good 10, 20, 30 years later. An old BG, AMG or Godzilla will still compete vs modern cars just fine. A 3 year old GPU is dated, a 5 year old GPU is on it's last legs when its running modern games.

So no, GPUs aren't luxury items. They are CONSUMABLES with a short expiration date. Don't let these companies fool you into folking out a luxury tax for a consumable. -_-
 

sirmo

Golden Member
Oct 10, 2011
1,014
391
136
Having had time to think about this.. I kind of don't mind these luxury GPUs. Generally speaking we all ultimately like GPUs in general Nvidia or AMD.

If people are willing to spend this much money, I am sure that money goes towards R&D and supporting the company they like. So to that end.. I do approve.

Things that do drive me nuts however are proprietary vendor lock ins, like CUDA and G-Sync.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |