[Various] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Review Thread

Page 23 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Qwertilot

Golden Member
Nov 28, 2013
1,604
257
126
Seems odd to me too, but it really isn't worth getting annoyed about! So long as it makes them happy
 

imaheadcase

Diamond Member
May 9, 2005
3,850
7
76
Of course it is. I hate seeing NV rewarded by 980 Ti owners for producing a card that's more expensive and not anything close to a worthy successor (and it doesn't need to be as an 04 card). $700 for 10 FPS? Why would anyone do that? Just turn down settings, pay nothing and notice nothing. It's the same effect (nothing), but for free.

And maybe when the time comes for a 980 Ti successor to be released, and railven along with enough other people have decided that 04 cards aren't worth $700, you'll get something more for your money, and so will the rest of us.

Spend the $700 on a nice 1440p G-Sync display, or an Ultrawide display, put it toward an OLED TV, or an Oculus/Vive or another 980 Ti or 12 AAA games. Way more value, you'll notice something rather than nothing, and apart from that, they're just great toys (or at least, they have a chance of being). The 1080 isn't. It overclocks 10%, has GDDR5 and looks like a 980. Building a whole new $700 PC would probably provide more enjoyment, even if it's not practical.

railven doesn't want the 1080, nor do any other 980 Ti owners, they want a finfet card that destroys the 980 Ti. The 1080 is not that, and once they get the 1080, they aren't going to come to any other conclusion. It's going to be a disappointment. Why not just wait and get a satisfying upgrade instead? When the 1080 Ti comes around, it'll be a disappointing 20-30% upgrade. You'll never get that experience of popping in a new truly powerful piece of hardware again. I remember when I replaced my 6670 with a that was great I got to play at 60 FPS for the first time ever. I remember buying a 144Hz monitor and playing a game at 100 FPS. That was amazing too. What I don't remember is replacing my two 670s with a 980, or replacing my 144Hz monitor with a 1440p 60Hz one. When I get a GP100 or a Vega, I'll remember that and I'll be happy (or maybe I won't because I barely ever play new games).

NV can of course price whatever product they want at whatever price they want, but I'd like to see people stop buying cards just have the latest numbers in their sig. It isn't worth it.

You assume people all consider what is a value is the same for everyone.
 

sam_816

Senior member
Aug 9, 2014
432
0
76
Yup I don't get why people act like videocards are so expensive sometimes. Cut out a couple of your game purchases. I've seen people with hundreds of games that they haven't played and a low end gpu. That's far worse to me than a person buying high-end gpus every year. At least you use your gpu whenever you game. You don't use your whole unplayed steam library



It all depends on what value they link to a product.

$60 game for $15 is good value while a $700 founder's edition is a bad value when gtx980ti xtreme edition is going for $450-500 on eBay.
I don't think its wrong to want to enjoy many different games as compared to fewer on max fidelity considering the next card is always around the corner.
Impulse purchase is a common issue related to all technology enthusiasts.

and companies exploit this behavior. VR headsets and msrp/ FE edition 1080/70 are most common examples.
 
Last edited:

Qwertilot

Golden Member
Nov 28, 2013
1,604
257
126
Well, and what value you assign $700 to. That's hugely different for different sections of the population. Its irrelevant pocket change for some and massive for others.
 

Ranulf

Platinum Member
Jul 18, 2001
2,409
1,310
136
You assume people all consider what is a value is the same for everyone.

After the past few years of perf/watt debates, some of us might be a bit cranky on the different values argument. Hey, $100 ain't much, a few non played steam games! Sure but an extra 50-100 watts more power usage is just horrible and bad, and wrong wrong wrong. Think of the earth! Think of your power bill! Space heater pc's liek omg!
 

provost

Member
Aug 7, 2013
51
1
16
I guess people can do whatever with their money, but as for me, I can't find anything compelling about this card; it's not going to give me 4K gaming, it's a mid range vis-à-vis
Nvidia's release schedule (no matter how much sales people thump their chest and argue otherwise..lol)and there is also that matter of limited optimization support period that seems to have become Nvidia's profitability standard...lol
So, essentially, nothing has changed since my Fury / sli cards in terms of gpus being able to push 4K on high settings. Nvidia's definition of "pushing the industry forward" apparently means unnecessary levels of tessellation gimping, aka, Witcher 3, couched euphemistically as increasing the "production value " of such games, on the same lousy 1080p and 1440p resolutions, thereby, rendering the existing cards nerfed relative to the the newer releases... A few percentage performance increase means what in terms of absolute fps performance gains? not much... so yeah, no thanks... happy to wait until 2017 rather than bite on these % based limited run marketing benchmarks... lol
 

Raising

Member
Mar 12, 2016
120
0
16
If the aftermarket cards can overclock up to 2.4ghz I'd consider them a worthy upgrade from a 980ti.
 

sam_816

Senior member
Aug 9, 2014
432
0
76
After the past few years of perf/watt debates, some of us might be a bit cranky on the different values argument. Hey, $100 ain't much, a few non played steam games! Sure but an extra 50-100 watts more power usage is just horrible and bad, and wrong wrong wrong. Think of the earth! Think of your power bill! Space heater pc's liek omg!

very good point & i totally agree with it. I would like to add that ppl adopt double standards when comparing gpus from AMD & Nvidia. when fury x launched & reviewers compared it with stock 980ti s ppl clamored that there is X % overclocking overhead but they are ok when 1080 is compared with dual 980 at stock.
Well, and what value you assign $700 to. That's hugely different for different sections of the population. Its irrelevant pocket change for some and massive for others.

when we talk about a $700 GPU we talk about the top 2 tiers only. of-course everyone wants the best but this is becoming a trend now. launch a new card with 20-30 (on marketing slides) then launch a titan-x and then a ti version. what %age do you think members of this forum or other forums(who vigorously discuss pros n cons) constitute the total consumer base for $700 GPUs? i don't think they cover more than 15%, rest just buy these cards because they want to. which is bad for the whole industry because, lets face it, AMD is in no position to set prices in this market now. they just follow the pricing model of Nvidia and price their GPUs proportionally to their GPUs performance. I strongly feel AMD is becoming more and more interested in making GPUs for consoles. It is a good business proposition considering they sold 40 mil chips to sony and over 20 mil to xbox. they are a small comany compared to nvidia and low-margin-high-volume business is good for them.
many ppl here are claiming that vega will be better than 1080 ti, i say lets assume it to be true but how many of us believe (after seeing fury x launch) that they will be able to serve the demand considering newer ps4/slimmer xbox will be launching near holidays. from where i see they don't have the means. so, even if vega is faster is 1080 ti ppl will still end up buying 1080ti as vega will be in low stock. I am assuming this considering the trend that ppl start selling their cards as soon as newer (esp Ti version) is announced.
I know many ppl wont blv me but i haven't paid for my gpu's in 1.5 years now(in fact they earned me my 2 ssds) but i am concerned about the pricing strategy of nvidia this time around. I see it as 1st step towards monopolistic regime of nvidia. they have resources to bring GPUs to market before AMD and they are always 'TAD' better than AMD's offerings. but with every launch they slowly increase the gap in market share and push AMD towards the edge. this time they did this dual pricing thing and they will get away with it. what will happen next time??
I think this whole 'bad value/not-getting-milked/overpriced' stemmed from the dual pricing of 1080/70 by nvidia. if they had announced the card for 700 and reduced the price of the card before the launch of polaris, people might have liked it.
 

imaheadcase

Diamond Member
May 9, 2005
3,850
7
76
So are aftermarket coolers coming the 27th, or JUST the founder edition version? If i got to wait a week for EVGA i can do that. I just don't want to wait a week, and both versions be sold out if i can get one now. hehe
 

imaheadcase

Diamond Member
May 9, 2005
3,850
7
76
I have a view of value and I'm arguing my case.

Which is my point, you can't argue a case that has no winner. I spent $400 last month in a MMO with in game purchases. Some people will understand, others don't get it at all.

I throw pennies on the ground if someone gives me them, others will scramble through traffic to pick them up.
 

wingman04

Senior member
May 12, 2016
393
12
51
I save all my change and it adds up, give me some of your money for a good donation me LOL.
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
So are aftermarket coolers coming the 27th, or JUST the founder edition version? If i got to wait a week for EVGA i can do that. I just don't want to wait a week, and both versions be sold out if i can get one now. hehe

Only the FE is available on the 27th (ie: tomorrow).

After market cards are said to be announced next week, but we have zero ETA on when they will go for sale. And when they do, expect them to be hard to find.
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Of course it is. I hate seeing NV rewarded by 980 Ti owners for producing a card that's more expensive and not anything close to a worthy successor (and it doesn't need to be as an 04 card). $700 for 10 FPS? Why would anyone do that? Just turn down settings, pay nothing and notice nothing. It's the same effect (nothing), but for free.

And maybe when the time comes for a 980 Ti successor to be released, and railven along with enough other people have decided that 04 cards aren't worth $700, you'll get something more for your money, and so will the rest of us.

Spend the $700 on a nice 1440p G-Sync display, or an Ultrawide display, put it toward an OLED TV, or an Oculus/Vive or another 980 Ti or 12 AAA games. Way more value, you'll notice something rather than nothing, and apart from that, they're just great toys (or at least, they have a chance of being). The 1080 isn't. It overclocks 10%, has GDDR5 and looks like a 980. Building a whole new $700 PC would probably provide more enjoyment, even if it's not practical.

railven doesn't want the 1080, nor do any other 980 Ti owners, they want a finfet card that destroys the 980 Ti. The 1080 is not that, and once they get the 1080, they aren't going to come to any other conclusion. It's going to be a disappointment. Why not just wait and get a satisfying upgrade instead? When the 1080 Ti comes around, it'll be a disappointing 20-30% upgrade. You'll never get that experience of popping in a new truly powerful piece of hardware again. I remember when I replaced my 6670 with a that was great I got to play at 60 FPS for the first time ever. I remember buying a 144Hz monitor and playing a game at 100 FPS. That was amazing too. What I don't remember is replacing my two 670s with a 980, or replacing my 144Hz monitor with a 1440p 60Hz one. When I get a GP100 or a Vega, I'll remember that and I'll be happy (or maybe I won't because I barely ever play new games).

NV can of course price whatever product they want at whatever price they want, but I'd like to see people stop buying cards just have the latest numbers in their sig. It isn't worth it.

Seriously. I'm not even the least bit excited about these cards. A proper successor is a 1080ti. Not any of these.
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
I'm sorry but I cannot go through 20+ pages so I would like a recap. Has there been any pictures or news of the aftermarket coolers for the 1080?

EDIT: found them... http://wccftech.com/gigabyte-evga-geforce-gtx-1080-custom-models/


EVGA SC and FTW (with dual 8-pin power): http://videocardz.com/60333/evga-geforce-gtx-1080-acx-3-0-superclocked-and-ftw-pictured

lots of EVGA SC pics (looks like an NVIDIA reference PCB with an ACX 3.0 cooler): http://hothardware.com/news/evga-ge...ed-avx-30-edition-and-gtx-1080-sli-sneak-peek

Asus Strix: http://videocardz.com/60340/asus-rog-strix-geforce-gtx-1080-pictured

Zotac AMP! cards (apparently both with dual 8-pin power): http://videocardz.com/60325/zotac-geforce-gtx-1080-amp-and-amp-extreme-pictured
 

showb1z

Senior member
Dec 30, 2010
462
53
91
Of course it is. I hate seeing NV rewarded by 980 Ti owners for producing a card that's more expensive and not anything close to a worthy successor (and it doesn't need to be as an 04 card). $700 for 10 FPS? Why would anyone do that? Just turn down settings, pay nothing and notice nothing. It's the same effect (nothing), but for free.

And maybe when the time comes for a 980 Ti successor to be released, and railven along with enough other people have decided that 04 cards aren't worth $700, you'll get something more for your money, and so will the rest of us.

Spend the $700 on a nice 1440p G-Sync display, or an Ultrawide display, put it toward an OLED TV, or an Oculus/Vive or another 980 Ti or 12 AAA games. Way more value, you'll notice something rather than nothing, and apart from that, they're just great toys (or at least, they have a chance of being). The 1080 isn't. It overclocks 10%, has GDDR5 and looks like a 980. Building a whole new $700 PC would probably provide more enjoyment, even if it's not practical.

railven doesn't want the 1080, nor do any other 980 Ti owners, they want a finfet card that destroys the 980 Ti. The 1080 is not that, and once they get the 1080, they aren't going to come to any other conclusion. It's going to be a disappointment. Why not just wait and get a satisfying upgrade instead? When the 1080 Ti comes around, it'll be a disappointing 20-30% upgrade. You'll never get that experience of popping in a new truly powerful piece of hardware again. I remember when I replaced my 6670 with a that was great I got to play at 60 FPS for the first time ever. I remember buying a 144Hz monitor and playing a game at 100 FPS. That was amazing too. What I don't remember is replacing my two 670s with a 980, or replacing my 144Hz monitor with a 1440p 60Hz one. When I get a GP100 or a Vega, I'll remember that and I'll be happy (or maybe I won't because I barely ever play new games).

NV can of course price whatever product they want at whatever price they want, but I'd like to see people stop buying cards just have the latest numbers in their sig. It isn't worth it.

Great post. I'm not in the market for $700 cards. But those prices obviously have an effect on the lower tiers.
I get money is not an issue for some people, but I'd still much prefer it if anti-consumer strategies like the Founders Edition didn't get rewarded.
 

brandonmatic

Member
Jul 13, 2013
199
21
81

Those are nice looking cards - especially the Zotac.

 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
Seems like GTX 1080's are hard to come by? No stock on NEWEGG and EVGA's website is down as well
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |