Never existed. There is GCN, GCN2 and GCN3.what happened to GCN 1.3?
The Titan X is designed more for people who really need the 12GB of RAM for GPU computing-related purposes, and probably don't mind playing a game or two with it (leaving aside the people that just have more money than sense). If they really were targeting the Titan X's performance for their top-end product, then the 980 Ti may well have wrong-footed them. We'll have to wait and see.
On another note, I'm not too keen on the name "Radeon Fury X." Sounds too much like "Rage Fury Maxx" for my liking.
Only if they found out.Then your company probably wouldnt survive the wrath of the Internet.
Good to know that they were able to know the performance without the card having drivers or bios and with a blank screen. Magical.
So much this.lol I was thinking the same thing. That article doesn't sound very convincing.
you would know right? D: you got some benchmark leaks somewhere? D:So it sounds like most people were correct. One new GPU chip and the rest rebrands.
you would know right? D: you got some benchmark leaks somewhere? D:
Its because Fiji is not a new architecture.
AMD have just scaled up the chip from 290X with more cores and included HBM.
Thats why I`m not 100% optimistic about TDP and power consumption vs 980Ti.
This.
$599 if it matches the 980Ti performance. $549 tops, if it is even just 2% slower than the 980Ti.
The power consumption worries me though. Not as much on the wattage itself, but the headroom for OCing.
but the price is why people buy AMD.
If that the case, I see no reason to bother with AMD this generation. I mean people buy AMD cause they are far cheaper than Nvidia and sometime slighty worst or slighty better but the price is why people buy AMD. A 50 to 100 dollar price differences for quicker driver support, gameworks, game developer support is not worth the hassle. Of course this is just my opinion.
your kidding right?
Better multiscreen gaming like eyefinity is the main reason for me.
if fiji has PLP support that be icing on the cake.
Mantle....
Does Nvidia not have anything similar to eyefinity?
dosnt work as well.
Judging from your other posts you may not know enough about how the gpu landscape changes over time especially now. I'm going amd because they support gcn better. Look ad kepler to see where maxwell will be in nvidia sponsored titles after Pascale drops. Look at non nvidia titles to see where kepler should be. Nvidia has a planned model for gpus going obsolete and I'm not paying the nvidia premium to upgrade my 980ti after 1 year when it drops to gtx 1060 non ti performance levels next year. Gaming would need a larger part of my budget or nvidia needs to show they care a lot about older generation gpus for me to get on board. Although 50 isn't enough of a price difference 100 is. In reality even 50 is a lot for me. I don't game enough to pay 50 more dollars so that nvidia can purposely gimp amd gpus as well as their own gpus with game works. I don't see gameworks or nvidia software as a bonus personally.For me, it has always been price. I have a 580m in my laptop but that was a free upgrade because there was a 2 week delay, other than that, AMD always seem cheaper and a better value.
I bought my HD 5850 over the Nvidia competitor because it was not only cheaper but better as well.
Does Nvidia not have anything similar to eyefinity?
How so?
I used both a 5870 and a 670 in 3x1200P setup. Both worked great...
Not trying to get off-topic here. Just asking.
Not enough flexibility with nvidia, If I buy a new screen I can use my amd card with the new mixed set up. So I can buy one screen not needing to buy 3 new ones.
I hope Fiji also incorperate the PLP support as that would be superb.
I did that as well.
I had a 2408, 2412 as a HP one (from work) and they worked fine. Never had to get 3 new ones.
???
If I see you passing speculation off as facts one more time, you will not be posting here until after the cards are released. I will not tolerate you being here to stir up unconfirmed rumors and pass them along as being true.
If you don't have a reference, don't even post it.
-Rvenger
Nvidia Surround does not support mixed resolution set ups in any way, shape or form.
http://www.eteknix.com/6400x1080-testing-mixed-resolution-amd-eyefinity/14/
I did that as well.
I had a 2408, 2412 as a HP one (from work) and they worked fine. Never had to get 3 new ones.
???
The titan X is not the original Titan and has its compute heldback compared to the previous model. The X is a gaming card not a compute card.
And with the 980TI so close in performance it has made the X pretty useless. It cannot fall back on DP compute performance as that has been stripped.
The only thing it has going for it is more Vram I believe that card has more vram than it can use in its life time.
Straight from the horse's mouth:
"Titan X, with its 12 GB of memory, is important for 4K video editing, for deep learning, and as a platform for researchers and developers (including those who are building 4K games). In other words, it's for those who need its memory."
Graphics cards have other uses besides just playing games.
30% more expensive than than 980Ti? It has to outperform it by quite a bit to justify that price if true. I would say at least 15% more performance at stock and some mean OC capabilities.