The talking point of "we have the fastest GPU" isn't worth much if the rest of that sentence is "but it is 2x the die size of the competition, guzzles power, and in ~50% of titles it only performs half as well as it theoretically can." Which is why a dual GPU card in the traditional sense is a horrible idea for a flagship in 2017. We've seen for years and years how multi-GPU support is hit-or-miss at best, while single GPUs have become powerful enough to deliver all the performance we want (and more). Remember back in the day, when pretty much nobody could play a game at 1024x768 with settings maxed out, or more recently, at 1080p 60fps maxed out? These days, even with far more demanding current titles, a $200 GPU gives you that. 1080p Ultra @60Hz has become the new baseline for low-to-midrange cards (RX 480, 580, 1060). Which is flippin' crazy, but we're there. Heck, most reviewers these days refuse to lower graphics settings, as if that's some sort of sacrilege. Even 4-5 years ago, playing any game maxed out at any respectable resolution was a privilege only a few could afford. As such, we don't need single-card multi-GPU solutions any more. Even $70 motherboards support CF, and multiple cards have the benefits of cooling far better, giving you an upgrade path, and just generally being far more practical. Oh, and not sounding like a jet engine.