That's without OCing where FuryX had barely any headroom and the 980Ti was an overclockers dream.
Odd that even on day 1 Fury X had 10% OC which is the exact same as Pascal yet Fury X has "no headroom" and Pascal is a good OCer according to any review out there...
Lets compare price/perf with features though right? So buy a WC'd 980 Ti, that's $770 and you end up with just slightly better price/perf over the Fury X when heavily OC'd and using more power
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...ws/70502-evga-gtx-980-ti-hybrid-review-3.html
If you wanted the best price/perf you would have bought Fury Air, which was only ~5% slower on average yet $100+ cheaper.
Funny enough though we never see any reviews with OC'd Fury X or even Fury Air while they did get 10% even at launch.
I'm not saying its a great OCer by any means, but when it matches what Pascal can do and people call it unable to OC while praising Pascal still it's just silly...
Quit arguing 2 year old crap.
AT Moderator ElFenix
Last edited by a moderator: