I can't speak for all of them, but my 5970s and my 7990 don't draw significantly more than 300W at stock clocks. If you tried OCing the 5970s VRM temps would go nuts and efficiency would suffer badly but at stock they were actually quite efficient.All those dual GPU cards are far above 300W ...
From the link
Still not reading? Let me bold it for you.
It isn't only SemiAccurate post:There's no confirmation that Vega will only have 2048bit bus ... only PCGH saying that Vega 10 has to be 2048 because it's 16 GB.
None of the fans are blocked on the pictures. And there are 3 of them. Its way better than the average case.
And why would AMD setup something that would throttle
to hide its performance from nvidia that they cant react fast enough why would they play with open cards lel
So you're saying that Vega performs very well? AKA better than OC 1080? Just want you to be clear about what you're saying.Vega performs as expected when you look at Polaris.
2048 bit memory bus is the configuration for every GPU that has been spawned by Greenland design. It has to be this way, because the CPU itself will also have access to the HBM memory, if AMD would want complete heterogenous unit.
That is why MI25 is dual Vega GPU, if it has 32 GB of HBM.
Because its basically the same chip. Greenland was only part of an APU. The CPU needs to have access to HBM2, if it is APU.What are you talking about? The CPU access the memory over PCIe or a special interface connected to the GPU, not the HBM directly.
Edit: I'm talking about dGPUs here, not the slide you posted that talks about APUs.
IF it's a 32GB GPU, it could also be a 4096bit bus ... why not? Remember Fiji?
With the < 300W envelop it makes more sense to be a single GPU board.
Yeah, that case appears to be an Air 540, while the small white one is definitely a 240. The google translation of the hardware.fr article isn't crystal clear, but it sounds like the picture you posted is of a different system doing network training.It doesn't seems like Corsair Carbide
Finally, end with a clear Radeon Instinct prototype was already on display last week and was busy train network. however impossible to observe the map more closely than do offer our cliché, AMD having taken care to conceal any opening of the case that getting into.
So GTX 1080 will have short Life.
IIRC, the Fury X and Fury both launched at approximately the same price as their performance competition at the time: the 980Ti and 980, so I wouldn't expect AMD to undercut the 1080 with Vega unless it performs worse. And of course NVIDIA can fire back with the 1080Ti (or 2080?) and drop the 1080's price to undercut Vega as, by that time, they will have the home field advantage (established production, economies of scale, etc.).What's most important is Vega's pricing...if it trades blows with the 1080 while being $150+ less then its a home run for AMD.
this 4096Sp vega is GP104 competitor/7970 successor.Well if the Vega 10 is released in May, the gtx1080 will be out a year.
To be honest , I don't think Vega 10 will be much faster than a gtx1080 unless you playing Doom Vulcan @ 4k.
Vega 10 should be competing with Titan XP and the 1080ti, just like Fury x vs the gtx980ti /Titan X.
This vega is just similar size as GP104 SKU(if 4096sp is correct)
None of the fans are blocked on the pictures. And there are 3 of them. Its way better than the average case.
And why would AMD setup something that would throttle
I don't see why they need to replace Polaris.. it's been fairly succesful in its price segment. It's not typical for AMD to replace an architecture less than a year since its inception. They have specifically even said that Polaris was mainstream first while Vega was high end and performance.Big Vega will compete with GTX 1070 and GTX 1080.
Small Vega will pretty much be a GTX 1060 competitor, replacing the Polaris line.