I think AMD intended for Vega to be out before now, but ran into some reason that lead to a delay. You can't honestly argue that they would plan to cede so much of the market for that long.
Anyone got a link to this 2016 Vega roadmap?
When AMD said 1H 2017, it was essentially confirmed that Vega was releasing in June. Don't know how you can see that and thing anything else.I remember when people saw that roadmap and thought there was a chance Vega was in 2016...
Bestbuy sell enthusiast GPUs?Best 1 day sales ever as weekend launch allows more people to head to bestbuy to buy the GPU.
Bestbuy sell enthusiast GPUs?
Yeah, the ones from 3 years ago.
It's obvious - they pulled resources onto Zen to get that finished. Can't blame them really.
I just got extra income to get Vega too, it's ready to go!
Perf/$ has to be better than Nvidia.Similar to GTX 480's launch, I wonder what the threshold of low performance or perf/$ will be for people to back out from a purchase at release who are otherwise committed today.
Nothing about that post was meant to be serious. I thought that was clear
I just got extra income to get Vega too, it's ready to go!
Perf/$ has to be better than Nvidia.
If its the same or lower then anyone who is currently interested in Vega but doesn't have a freesync monitor will back out. Only the ones with freesync will still buy it then.
Actually I think Vega will only be in the freesync market at 4k, I haven't looked into 1440p much but I bet the 1080ti smokes it easily.
I'm kind of hoping that the 8gb HBM2 will sustain 7680x1080p at 100fps+... I don't want much do I.
Yeah, Powercolor sending out invites doesn't instill confidence that it will be about Vega.If you're expecting Vega at Computex, you will likely be disappointed. Nothing in the agenda really points to Vega.
100% of the "clues" people are grasping at can 100% be explained by RX 5xx series products.
That's only ~8 Mpixels, the same as 4k. And I think most agree than 4GB is fine for many (most?) 4k needs, so double that should be more than enough.
Have you tried 21:9? I had triple monitors for awhile but much prefer my ultrawide setup now for gaming. And you're only dealing with 5Mp resolution.Kind of makes me want to get Vega and then try VSR just to see if it could handle it before I drop the cash on the monitors.
5Mp resolution; ~"3k". In proper talk Ultrawide QHD, which I am also running and recommend. At ~34" and higher than 60Hz I agree it's a great format.Have you tried 21:9? I had triple monitors for awhile but much prefer my ultrawide setup now for gaming. And you're only dealing with 5k resolution.
Gaming with my 970 I'm very convinced I'll need more than 4Gb of VRAM, even if Vega's magic bullet HBCC does turn out to be very useful in that regard. Far too often I'm pushing 3-3.5Gb VRAM usage in games.Obviously I'd prefer 8gb for peace of mind, but I've never been objectively convinced I'll need more than 4GB.
As stated before, VRAM usage doesn't mean a whole bunch. Some games take up a lot more when its available with no actual performance difference.Gaming with my 970 I'm very convinced I'll need more than 4Gb of VRAM, even if Vega's magic bullet HBCC does turn out to be very useful in that regard. Far too often I'm pushing 3-3.5Gb VRAM usage in games.
Have you tried 21:9? I had triple monitors for awhile but much prefer my ultrawide setup now for gaming. And you're only dealing with 5Mp resolution.
edit: thanks for correction richaron