Magic Hate Ball
Senior member
- Feb 2, 2017
- 290
- 250
- 96
end of july launch for vega.Still 3 months left lol..
end of july launch for vega.Still 3 months left lol..
What you say is what bothers me about the whole IF mythology. I don't code, but it would seem to me next to impossible for the IF to allow mGPU to act as one across apps not developed for it to do so.So they have the ability to have software transparent mGPU, but they need developers on board? How counter intuitive!
Or how about Raja in the first Capsaicin saying that they will need to get developers on board with mGPU in games because monolithic GPU's become impractical?
Again, if they knew they could make software transparent mGPU, why would they invest the resources to have developers with DX12/VK develop mGPU options?
The dots don't connect
mGPU solutions will become better with IF and interposers, but it won't be software transparent.
Threadcrapping sounds better when you don't make simple math errors. It's 2 months...end of july launch for vega.Still 3 months left lol..
AMD just demo'd Prey @ 4K with Threadripper and 2 Vega GPUs. No FPS counter of course. lol.
Shouldn't need two cards at 4k unless it's ~GTX 1080 performance. The 1080 TI averages 83 fps. Not a good showing at all for gaming Vega.
Yeah, this doesn't seem to bode well
What about barely 60fps?
Shouldn't need two cards at 4k unless it's ~GTX 1080 performance. The 1080 TI averages 83 fps. Not a good showing at all for gaming Vega.
If Vega fails, then it will be hard for Raja to justify keeping his job.
It is about time people stopped posting TPU charts lacking context.
Shouldn't need two cards at 4k unless it's ~GTX 1080 performance. The 1080 TI averages 83 fps. Not a good showing at all for gaming Vega.
If Vega does well in the pro market, Raja will be just fine. The problem is Vega is late and big Volta is seemingly early.
I had no idea when I skipped fury x I'd have to wait this long.We are at the end of May now. so its 2 months left. Still its very disappointing to see RX Vega launch pretty much in early August 2017. This has been the longest time ever that ATI/AMD has been without a competitive GPU at the high end. 14 months to be precise. Given that GPU generations from Nvidia are now coming at breakneck pace at 18-24 months this kind of time to market lag is suicidal for AMD's gpu division.I think something has gone wrong with Vega. For a product which was supposed to launch in H1 2017 to land in early Aug 2017 is just poor execution. I think AMD Vega performance might be underwhelming and it will struggle to match 1080 Ti.