<< for those of you that "think" it was under self-defense. i think thats just a joke.
first off, did he (the murderer) have any reasonable reason in defending himself? (him being over the weight size by 100 i believe)
and second, did he use reasonable force in resisting the "attacker?"
danny~! >>
This is EXACTLY why we have juries - those of us who have just read about a case in the media are not qualified to answer these kinds of questions. You were not there and have no idea whether or not his behavior was reasonable, or whether he acted in self-defense. The fact of the matter is that the jury has the sole authority to decide these things, and they have done so.