Verizon fires a shot accross the iphone's bow

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Codewiz

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2002
5,758
0
76
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Codewiz
Android is a great platform and I personally will say BETTER than the Objective C platform of the iphone. I hate to break it to Apple fanboys but Objective C is only used at Apple. No one gives a shit aobut it outside of apple. You can slam java all you want but it is widely used and isn't slow. It is a viable platform for development especially with the hardware coming down the pipe. Android will be tapping into a huge marketshare of developers that don't have to learn a new language. Objective C is just a fvcking pain in the ass.

And the Android SDK is a ubiquitous platform? Hate Objective-C all you want -- 80,000 apps on the app store. iPhone development is what people want to do. Stanford's iPhone Development course is #1 on iTunes U for months. Android development -- not so much.

See you don't understand the market.....

Apple once again changed the playing field and people have had to catch up. The iphone has a huge app store because they had the BEST phone. That isn't going to be the case shortly.

Then you will see how quickly developers jump ship....

Look at smart phones prior to the iphone. Look at them now. Apple did a ton of good. And the competition we are seeing now is great for customers. We still wouldn't have copy and paste if it weren't for competition.

Objective C still sucks....
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
I don't hate Apple, although I hate most of their fanboys, and some of their pseudo-false advertising. I've owned mulitple iPods. As evidenced in the Zune HD thread a few weeks ago, I flat out said there are plenty of people for whom the iPod Touch is a superior product - just not me. I recognize that they make good computers, if overpriced. I did, indeed, think the first iPhone was worthless garbage - but the new ones are not. I would never buy one, but I would never buy *any* phone without a hardware keyboard.

And frankly your knowledge of programming languages is shockingly inaccurate for someone that claims to have been coding for 13 years. Especially now that you're throwing out blanket statements like the one you just made, that's completely absurd.

Oh, and you made that comment about 80k apps above - its estimated that the Android Market has somewhere between 12-15k apps. Despite a MUCH lower installed user base of Android phones, almost primarily on the nation's smallest carrier. Now that more and more Android phones are hitting the market (Hero/Droid/Cliq are just a few, there are a lot coming in the next six months), that number will skyrocket. It has nothing to do with the quality of the SDK or Java vs C. Hell, look at consoles. PS2 was the hardest to code for of the 3 consoles last generation...and yet has by FAR the most games. Why? Because of the larger install base. Developers (well, good ones that are interested in making money) put their effort into platforms with the most potential for money, not what programming language they have to use.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Jack Ryan
Agreed, and why does he still work with Java if he hates it so much?

I do Java back-end development and like I said, in that capacity Java works well. I am in a department with 100 Java developers and every one of them will laugh at you if you even bring up the notion of Java UI. Heck, most of them are learning iPhone development.

...and yet you make claims such as

You can't get blood from a stone any less more than you can get good performance from a VM. Even shoddily written native apps will outperform fine-tuned VM apps in nearly all cases.

Does it not occur to you that back end software needs good performance too? Have you heard of cloud computing? Why would Java be acceptable for back end work if you can't get good performance out of a VM?
 

dwell

pics?
Oct 9, 1999
5,189
2
0
Originally posted by: Codewiz
Apple once again changed the playing field and people have had to catch up. The iphone has a huge app store because they had the BEST phone. That isn't going to be the case shortly.

The G1 was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Storm was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Pre was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Zune HD supposed to be an iPod Touch killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.

Then you will see how quickly developers jump ship....

Show me a real iPod killer and I will show you developer's jumping ship.

Objective C still sucks....

That's your opinion.

 

dwell

pics?
Oct 9, 1999
5,189
2
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
And frankly your knowledge of programming languages is shockingly inaccurate for someone that claims to have been coding for 13 years. Especially now that you're throwing out blanket statements like the one you just made, that's completely absurd.

Such as? If you want to call you my knowledge of programming languages, cite some examples or don't make the claim.

Oh, and you made that comment about 80k apps above - its estimated that the Android Market has somewhere between 12-15k apps. Despite a MUCH lower installed user base of Android phones, almost primarily on the nation's smallest carrier. Now that more and more Android phones are hitting the market (Hero/Droid/Cliq are just a few, there are a lot coming in the next six months), that number will skyrocket. It has nothing to do with the quality of the SDK or Java vs C. Hell, look at consoles. PS2 was the hardest to code for of the 3 consoles last generation...and yet has by FAR the most games. Why? Because of the larger install base. Developers (well, good ones that are interested in making money) put their effort into platforms with the most potential for money, not what programming language they have to use.

You're assuming Apple will site idol and A) not sell any more iPhones and B) not go to any other carrier. There's already a rumor that the iPhone will hit Verizon's G4 service in July 2010.

There are 21M iPhones out there and 20M iPod Touches. So Apple has over a 40M unit lead and growing. So you're right, the platform with the most units will win.

 
Dec 26, 2007
11,783
2
76
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Codewiz
Apple once again changed the playing field and people have had to catch up. The iphone has a huge app store because they had the BEST phone. That isn't going to be the case shortly.

The G1 was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Storm was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Pre was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Zune HD supposed to be an iPod Touch killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.

Then you will see how quickly developers jump ship....

Show me a real iPod killer and I will show you developer's jumping ship.

Objective C still sucks....

That's your opinion.

Most of those phones weren't directly marketed as iPhone killers, and instead were instead called that by reviewers and the media/hype. The Pre is the closest to an "iPhone killer", and it is a great phone. One of the major reasons are the networks the Pre/G1 were released on. Put them on Verizon and I'd bet you have much more market penetration. Regarding the Storm, the click-screen was a poor choice and the touchscreen sucked. It still wasn't marketed as a iPhone killer.

MP3 marketplace is totally different, so adding the Zune/Touch debate is irrelevant in this discussion.
 

dwell

pics?
Oct 9, 1999
5,189
2
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Jack Ryan
Agreed, and why does he still work with Java if he hates it so much?

I do Java back-end development and like I said, in that capacity Java works well. I am in a department with 100 Java developers and every one of them will laugh at you if you even bring up the notion of Java UI. Heck, most of them are learning iPhone development.

...and yet you make claims such as

You can't get blood from a stone any less more than you can get good performance from a VM. Even shoddily written native apps will outperform fine-tuned VM apps in nearly all cases.

Does it not occur to you that back end software needs good performance too? Have you heard of cloud computing? Why would Java be acceptable for back end work if you can't get good performance out of a VM?

There's a difference between the 500ms you wait for a database or web service call to return vs the 16 - 33ms response time you need to render a frame in a fluid UI app.

Most back-end jobs are just cranking out the same queries over and over which get cached in memory and the code gets compiled to native by the JIT. If there's any deviation the latency is definitely on the data provider side of the equation.

Java performance is perfectly acceptable for a back-end applications because the latency is not measured in hundredths of a second as is the case with UI apps.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,783
2
76
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Deeko
And frankly your knowledge of programming languages is shockingly inaccurate for someone that claims to have been coding for 13 years. Especially now that you're throwing out blanket statements like the one you just made, that's completely absurd.

Such as? If you want to call you my knowledge of programming languages, cite some examples or don't make the claim.

Oh, and you made that comment about 80k apps above - its estimated that the Android Market has somewhere between 12-15k apps. Despite a MUCH lower installed user base of Android phones, almost primarily on the nation's smallest carrier. Now that more and more Android phones are hitting the market (Hero/Droid/Cliq are just a few, there are a lot coming in the next six months), that number will skyrocket. It has nothing to do with the quality of the SDK or Java vs C. Hell, look at consoles. PS2 was the hardest to code for of the 3 consoles last generation...and yet has by FAR the most games. Why? Because of the larger install base. Developers (well, good ones that are interested in making money) put their effort into platforms with the most potential for money, not what programming language they have to use.

You're assuming Apple will site idol and A) not sell any more iPhones and B) not go to any other carrier. There's already a rumor that the iPhone will hit Verizon's G4 service in July 2010.

There are 21M iPhones out there and 20M iPod Touches. So Apple has over a 40M unit lead and growing. So you're right, the platform with the most units will win.

Uhhh Verizon is unlikely to get the iPhone anytime in the near future, especially with this latest marketing campaign. If the Droid has the UI/interface then it very well can hurt Apple. Yeah, it might have a 40+M unit lead but it also has a good 2 year head start on Android. Seeing as Android platform has quite a bit of apps already with phones on minor carriers, when it hits VZW that should jump up quite fast.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,215
11
81
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Deeko
And frankly your knowledge of programming languages is shockingly inaccurate for someone that claims to have been coding for 13 years. Especially now that you're throwing out blanket statements like the one you just made, that's completely absurd.

Such as? If you want to call you my knowledge of programming languages, cite some examples or don't make the claim.

I already did. You claimed its impossible to get good performance out of a VM. That is false. I already provided examples of companies doing just that.

Oh, and you made that comment about 80k apps above - its estimated that the Android Market has somewhere between 12-15k apps. Despite a MUCH lower installed user base of Android phones, almost primarily on the nation's smallest carrier. Now that more and more Android phones are hitting the market (Hero/Droid/Cliq are just a few, there are a lot coming in the next six months), that number will skyrocket. It has nothing to do with the quality of the SDK or Java vs C. Hell, look at consoles. PS2 was the hardest to code for of the 3 consoles last generation...and yet has by FAR the most games. Why? Because of the larger install base. Developers (well, good ones that are interested in making money) put their effort into platforms with the most potential for money, not what programming language they have to use.

You're assuming Apple will site idol and A) not sell any more iPhones and B) not go to any other carrier. There's already a rumor that the iPhone will hit Verizon's G4 service in July 2010.

There are 21M iPhones out there and 20M iPod Touches. So Apple has over a 40M unit lead and growing. So you're right, the platform with the most units will win.

I never said they wouldn't sell any more iPhones, where did I say that? I also didn't say developers would stop writing for the App Store. You have this warped little fanboy view that it has to be all or nothing. There can be phones better than iPhone for certain things. There can be apps developed for multiple platforms.

My point is simple - the Android Market has between 15-20% as many apps as the App Store. This with, I'd imagine, considerably less marketshare than that, with pretty much two phones in one year on the smallest carrier. Add a dozen phones on the larger carrier, including Verizon, and you've got a lot more Android phones on the market - and thus a lot more incentive to code for the platform - and thus a lot more than the already impressive number of Android apps already. This isn't hard.

There's a difference between the 500ms you wait for a database or web service call to return vs the 16 - 33ms response time you need to render a frame in a fluid UI app.

Most back-end jobs are just cranking out the same queries over and over which get cached in memory and the code gets compiled to native by the JIT. If there's any deviation the latency is definitely on the data provider side of the equation.

Java performance is perfectly acceptable for a back-end applications because the latency is not measured in hundredths of a second as is the case with UI apps.

You have a very strange, narrow view of the programming world. Why must every back end server wait for a database? Why must a web service call take 500ms? Why do you assume the code calling those things has no computation of its own? Believe it or not...there is more done in the programming world than rendering a UI and calling a database. Shocking, I know.

I recently worked on a middle/back end Java service that would time out after 150ms, had a target of <50ms for 99.9% of calls, and averaged about 9ms. It talked to no databases and called no other services. This Java service was directly related to a UI control - while it did not render the UI itself, the return value from the call populated the UI.

Guess what? This service was migrated from a legacy C++ call that did similar things...and had faster performance than its legacy version. Who woulda thought that was possible with a VM it is impossible to get performance out of???

Its flat out ignorant and foolish to say you can't get performance out of a language like Java or C#. Seriously, give up arguing, you are wrong. As I said before, a well coded application will perform well, period.
 

cheezy321

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2003
6,218
2
0
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Codewiz
Apple once again changed the playing field and people have had to catch up. The iphone has a huge app store because they had the BEST phone. That isn't going to be the case shortly.

The G1 was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Storm was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Pre was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Zune HD supposed to be an iPod Touch killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.

Then you will see how quickly developers jump ship....

Show me a real iPod killer and I will show you developer's jumping ship.

Objective C still sucks....

That's your opinion.

Most of those phones weren't directly marketed as iPhone killers, and instead were instead called that by reviewers and the media/hype. The Pre is the closest to an "iPhone killer", and it is a great phone. One of the major reasons are the networks the Pre/G1 were released on. Put them on Verizon and I'd bet you have much more market penetration. Regarding the Storm, the click-screen was a poor choice and the touchscreen sucked. It still wasn't marketed as a iPhone killer.

MP3 marketplace is totally different, so adding the Zune/Touch debate is irrelevant in this discussion.

Yes they were. Why else would you make a touchscreen keyboard? Come on, its a ridiculous notion to say that these phones werent going directly after prospective/current iphone users.
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
Originally posted by: cheezy321
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: Codewiz
Apple once again changed the playing field and people have had to catch up. The iphone has a huge app store because they had the BEST phone. That isn't going to be the case shortly.

The G1 was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Storm was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Pre was supposed to be an iPhone killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.
The Zune HD supposed to be an iPod Touch killer -- it didn't phase Apple at all.

Then you will see how quickly developers jump ship....

Show me a real iPod killer and I will show you developer's jumping ship.

Objective C still sucks....

That's your opinion.

Most of those phones weren't directly marketed as iPhone killers, and instead were instead called that by reviewers and the media/hype. The Pre is the closest to an "iPhone killer", and it is a great phone. One of the major reasons are the networks the Pre/G1 were released on. Put them on Verizon and I'd bet you have much more market penetration. Regarding the Storm, the click-screen was a poor choice and the touchscreen sucked. It still wasn't marketed as a iPhone killer.

MP3 marketplace is totally different, so adding the Zune/Touch debate is irrelevant in this discussion.

Yes they were. Why else would you make a touchscreen keyboard? Come on, its a ridiculous notion to say that these phones werent going directly after prospective/current iphone users.

no they were not marketed as iPhone "killers" that label was added by the press. Why does having a touchscreen automatically mean that it is an iPhone "killer" sure they were designed to compete but none of them have been marketed as "killers" other than maybe the Palm Pre.

however I find this conversation very fun. The rampant fanboyism of Chris towards Apple is very entertaining considering DV has kept it mostly civil.

I look forward to a good competitive smart phone with a keyboard (droid) on a much better network(less dropped calls and larger coverage area). Maybe now prices can come down across the board.

But somehow this whole thread turned into Chris foaming at the mouth about apple being the best and that the Droid will suck without ever using it and then bashing Java. It's fun to see how brand loyalty/identification controls some people. Thank you for the entertainment Chris.
 

dwell

pics?
Oct 9, 1999
5,189
2
0
Originally posted by: Deeko
I already did. You claimed its impossible to get good performance out of a VM. That is false. I already provided examples of companies doing just that.

I never said that. My focus has been UI performance. *Java's UI performance flat out sucks* Stop making up things and putting words in my mouth. The only examples of Java performance you can give are non-UI based.

Why doesn't Microsoft write the Windows API in .NET? Oh wait they tried that with Longhorn Mach 1 and the performance was lousy so they gave up on it.

My point is simple - the Android Market has between 15-20% as many apps as the App Store. This with, I'd imagine, considerably less marketshare than that, with pretty much two phones in one year on the smallest carrier. Add a dozen phones on the larger carrier, including Verizon, and you've got a lot more Android phones on the market - and thus a lot more incentive to code for the platform - and thus a lot more than the already impressive number of Android apps already. This isn't hard.

That's making a lot of assumptions. I am willing to table this until next year to laugh in your face about how another billed iPhone killer flopped, just like the others before it. You're just an Apple hater looking for the next great white hope.

I recently worked on a middle/back end Java service that would time out after 150ms, had a target of <50ms for 99.9% of calls, and averaged about 9ms. It talked to no databases and called no other services. This Java service was directly related to a UI control - while it did not render the UI itself, the return value from the call populated the UI.

So what? I written many Java apps that ran fast enough. I've written zero Java UI-based apps that performed anywhere near their native counterparts. That's why Swing flopped, AWT flopped, SWT flopped, Java2D flopped, and Java3D flopped.

And for the record, you can get "acceptable" performance out of Java on a phone, but if you want fluid UI and quick load times like the iPhone -- forget Java.

Its flat out ignorant and foolish to say you can't get performance out of a language like Java or C#. Seriously, give up arguing, you are wrong. As I said before, a well coded application will perform well, period.

Wow, what insight. Do you know about indirection? What's faster?

1) Native Code -> Hardware

or

2) Byte Code -> Virtual Machine -> Native instructions -> Hardware

To top that off, Dalvik does not even use a JIT -- it's even slower than comparable VMs!

http://www.koushikdutta.com/2009/01/dalvik-vs-mono.html

http://occipital.com/blog/2008...eed-and-the-dalvik-vm/

http://openhandsetmagazine.com...droid-the-final-point/

http://occipital.com/blog/2008...e-3-iphone-comparison/

Conclusions:

Objective-C kills the Java implementation on Android. It?s almost exactly 100 times faster. Note that I?m unsure if the memory allocation is included in the timing, so a more conservative statement is that Objective-C can run a tight loop 50 times faster than the Dalvik JVM. It?s also true that real applications aren?t full of tight loops, and a real Android application won?t be 50 times slower than an iPhone counterpart. Nevertheless, all else being equal, it will be slower, and potentially a lot slower.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,352
11
0
Originally posted by: venkman
Android and WinMo phones can do more than a iphone can. There is no arguing that, it's not even close. The difference is that what the iphone does, it does a MUCH MUCH better than WinMo/Android.
Like texting? Taking calls?
 

Codewiz

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2002
5,758
0
76
So now I have to answer for other people's claims?

The Pre suffers from Palms inability to create a decent SDK.

Android suffered from the fact that hardware wasn't fast enough to deal with the platform.

Android is already picking up steam. You can remain blind to the shortfalls of the iphone, I don't care. But your blind loyalty is hilarious. You will make any bogus argument you can.

Once again, I use my iphone because it is the best smartphone right now. It is. However, put some hardware behind an Android phone, and I will jump ship. I don't have loyalty to any company. I go for the best product that fits my needs. The android marketplace already has all the main apps I could need. The biggest knock is the hardware still. Get some real hardware and I have nothing keeping me on my iphone.

Sorry but I NEED to run multiple apps at once and I hate having to jailbreak my phone to do it. The iphone has faults but it is still the best right now. That lead is quickly closing and Apple knows it. Why do you think they implemented copy and paste after saying over and over it wasn't needed.
 
Oct 9, 1999
19,636
36
91
Originally posted by: Spineshank
Ive owned all 3 Iphones, (currently using a 3gs) and owned a G1 and i must say i really liked Android...however the touchscreen itself on the G1 is what made me want to go back to the Iphone. Given the fact that the Droid will have multitouch makes me optimistic about this phone.

i have a g1 and have multitouch.

root it and you'll fall in love with it.
 

optoman

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 1999
4,181
0
0
I got my hands on the Droid today and like it alot. I currently use a storm and the Droid wanted me to trade up. The browser is fast and responsive. It does have wifi and we are not limiting the phone at all. The touch screen is one of the best I have ever used. Used a iphone for about 10 minutes and I would say they are about the same as regards to the touch screen performance. The tabbing in the browser is excellent and I had about 5 apps running and it didn't even hiccup. The real question is do I get the Moto or wait for the HTC versions.

Any questions about the phone?
 

Codewiz

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2002
5,758
0
76
Originally posted by: optoman
I got my hands on the Droid today and like it alot. I currently use a storm and the Droid wanted me to trade up. The browser is fast and responsive. It does have wifi and we are not limiting the phone at all. The touch screen is one of the best I have ever used. Used a iphone for about 10 minutes and I would say they are about the same as regards to the touch screen performance. The tabbing in the browser is excellent and I had about 5 apps running and it didn't even hiccup. The real question is do I get the Moto or wait for the HTC versions.

Any questions about the phone?

How snappy is the interface when you have multiple apps running.

I get pissed with my iphone when switching between pages occasionally. Is there much lag?
 

optoman

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 1999
4,181
0
0
Originally posted by: Codewiz


How snappy is the interface when you have multiple apps running.

I get pissed with my iphone when switching between pages occasionally. Is there much lag?

The lag was less than 1/2 a second. I couldn't believe how snappy it was. I couldn't find out the speed of the processor but someone had mentioned it was around 600mhz. I couldn't get alot of technical data about the phone. The only issue I had was with the camera. It is getting worked on in the software and will be corrected by the time it launches on .......well I just can't give the date.
 

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
Originally posted by: sohcrates
apple spends an amazing amount of time perfecting it's user interface. everyone else who tries to compete may have great hardware but rushes to market. people are so used to great apple interfaces that the bar is pretty darn high for useability.

i am very excited about Droid. I just hope they are not rushing it out with a lot of hype without enough testing.

my buddy has started programming apps for android. it is very powerful and has so much possibility as an open platform I really think it is best suited for direct apple competition.

and yet the wall of icons is a UI disaster
 

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
Originally posted by: optoman
I got my hands on the Droid today and like it alot. I currently use a storm and the Droid wanted me to trade up. The browser is fast and responsive. It does have wifi and we are not limiting the phone at all. The touch screen is one of the best I have ever used. Used a iphone for about 10 minutes and I would say they are about the same as regards to the touch screen performance. The tabbing in the browser is excellent and I had about 5 apps running and it didn't even hiccup. The real question is do I get the Moto or wait for the HTC versions.

Any questions about the phone?

How is the keyboard and the ability to type on it? Does it render websites well? Let's say if your on the web or checking email and want to listen to music, are there shortcuts or buttons you can use to change tracks without haven't to tab into the music player?

Also, do you know if tethering it to your computer will work or what kind of monthly plans Verizon is talking about?
 

xeemzor

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2005
2,599
1
71
Originally posted by: rockyct
Originally posted by: optoman
I got my hands on the Droid today and like it alot. I currently use a storm and the Droid wanted me to trade up. The browser is fast and responsive. It does have wifi and we are not limiting the phone at all. The touch screen is one of the best I have ever used. Used a iphone for about 10 minutes and I would say they are about the same as regards to the touch screen performance. The tabbing in the browser is excellent and I had about 5 apps running and it didn't even hiccup. The real question is do I get the Moto or wait for the HTC versions.

Any questions about the phone?

How is the keyboard and the ability to type on it? Does it render websites well? Let's say if your on the web or checking email and want to listen to music, are there shortcuts or buttons you can use to change tracks without haven't to tab into the music player?

Also, do you know if tethering it to your computer will work or what kind of monthly plans Verizon is talking about?

More importantly, can you give us a range on the cost of the phone?
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,783
2
76
Originally posted by: rockyct
Originally posted by: optoman
I got my hands on the Droid today and like it alot. I currently use a storm and the Droid wanted me to trade up. The browser is fast and responsive. It does have wifi and we are not limiting the phone at all. The touch screen is one of the best I have ever used. Used a iphone for about 10 minutes and I would say they are about the same as regards to the touch screen performance. The tabbing in the browser is excellent and I had about 5 apps running and it didn't even hiccup. The real question is do I get the Moto or wait for the HTC versions.

Any questions about the phone?

How is the keyboard and the ability to type on it? Does it render websites well? Let's say if your on the web or checking email and want to listen to music, are there shortcuts or buttons you can use to change tracks without haven't to tab into the music player?

Also, do you know if tethering it to your computer will work or what kind of monthly plans Verizon is talking about?

I think we can all basically agree that the iPhone's Safari browser is the current best in the market for smartphones. How does the Droid's compare?

You mention that there is no block on the wifi, but what about GPS (if there is any, I don't recall reading if there is or not)?

What about construction, is it a solid phone that can stand up to the day to day beatings it will take over 2 years?

Have you used an iPhone for only 10 minutes? If you've used it more then that, does it seem like it's an iPhone killer to you? Would you get the iPhone or Droid?

May I ask how you got to play with the phone today (VZW employee, Moto employee, friend of an employee, etc)?

What would you say the keyboard "feels" most similar to in terms of phones? How responsive is it?

Thanks in advanced,
DV

Cheers and you're a lucky bastard! :beer::wine::thumbsup:
 

cheezy321

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2003
6,218
2
0
Originally posted by: optoman
I got my hands on the Droid today and like it alot. I currently use a storm and the Droid wanted me to trade up. The browser is fast and responsive. It does have wifi and we are not limiting the phone at all. The touch screen is one of the best I have ever used. Used a iphone for about 10 minutes and I would say they are about the same as regards to the touch screen performance. The tabbing in the browser is excellent and I had about 5 apps running and it didn't even hiccup. The real question is do I get the Moto or wait for the HTC versions.

Any questions about the phone?

How is the keyboard? Does everything integrate together well like on the iPhone? I.E. get from music to web browsing easily? How does it look? I know its thin like the iPhone, but from the pictures it just does not have the same aesthetic appeal. Is the touchscreen really as good as the iPhone? Does it respond to dual finger motions like the iphone? (Pinch, Stretch, turn, etc..)

Does it feel solid? Any flimsy parts on it?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |