[VideoCardz] GTX 1070 Benchmarks

[Arachnotronic]

This time we are not including overclocking results in our charts, but we will tell you what we know. It appears that overclocked GTX 1070 will not beat GTX 1080 in synthetic benchmarks (hitting around 4450 GPU points in Ultra). More importantly GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition suffers from the same power limitation problem, that we know from GTX 1080.

That said the average overclocking frequency of Founders Edition is around 2060 MHz, but it will vary depending on the sample. The good news is that there is no problem with memory overclocking, most cards should be able to hit 9 GHz effective speed (2250 MHz), which unfortunately is still less than GTX 1080 (320 GB/s), but enough to increase bandwidth by 32 GB/s to 288 GB/s.

http://videocardz.com/60265/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-3dmark-firestrike-benchmarks

 

[ShintaiDK]

Faster than Titan X

 

[Arachnotronic]

Faster than Titan X

Basically 980 Ti class performance for much cheaper.

 

[Sweepr]

Nice. Closer to the Geforce GTX 1080 than I expected. Can't wait to see gaming results.

 

[Adul]

Nice. Closer to the Geforce GTX 1080 than I expected. Can't wait to see gaming results.

yet it is a much greater distance between it and the 1080 than there was for the 970 and 980.

 

[Face2Face]

This is about what everyone was expecting. If we can get a custom variant for $379, then we'll have a real winner, of course that also depends on Polaris too price/performance too.

 

[Arachnotronic]

yet it is a much greater distance between it and the 1080 than there was for the 970 and 980.

But this time NVIDIA is giving people a full 8GB of RAM, not the 3.5+0.5 that so many people complained about

 

[Kris194]

How 24% gap is close to GTX 1080? Still waiting for gaming results.

 

[boozzer]

so all those admins at used pc hardware sales places are 100% correct in telling everyone to stop buying used 980 ti till benchmarks

nice people are nice people.

 

[Insomniator]

yet it is a much greater distance between it and the 1080 than there was for the 970 and 980.

Oh my god completely unrelated.

The 980TI just dropped $150 in price (if the MSRP rings true), gained 2 GB of memory, plus maybe some OC room and lower power consumption.

Add in some rebates if Polaris is competitive... $350 1070?

 

[digitaldurandal]

yet it is a much greater distance between it and the 1080 than there was for the 970 and 980.

For Firestrike Ultra there is a ~45% improvement from 970 to 980 and a ~22% improvement from 1070 to 1080. For Extreme it is ~20% improvement from 970 to 980 and a ~20% improvement from 1070 to 1080.

Don't bother comparing the Performance numbers with the class these cards are in, it only distorts things. Real world numbers in games will tell a real story. I do not think the gap between them is significantly different assuming these benches are true though.

 

[Bacon1]

But this time NVIDIA is giving people a full 8GB of RAM, not the 3.5+0.5 that so many people complained about

One of the first leaks showed 7.5GB

http://videocardz.com/59558/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-benchmarks

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11061015

What card is that?

 

[Head1985]

1070 have only 9% OC headroom.

This time we are not including overclocking results in our charts, but we will tell you what we know. It appears that overclocked GTX 1070 will not beat GTX 1080 in synthetic benchmarks (hitting around 4450 GPU points in Ultra). More importantly GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition suffers from the same power limitation problem, that we know from GTX 1080.

 

[Lepton87]

Practically no 980Ti were sold with stock clocks. For example mine boosts to over 1420MHz at stock so it seems even after OC it won't match my stock card. Disappointing!

 

[crisium]

If this is accurate, it's what most of us expected. I figured they would have it clock juuust enough to edge out the Titan X by single digit % pts.

I imagine max OC 1070 vs 980 Ti will be very close, but at least as far as FE vs Aftermarket Ti I think the Ti may have a very slight win. But, price notwithstanding, with more VRAM, lower power consumption, new displayport, potentially better Gameworks compatability, etc this is probably the more desirable card.

 

[Tumaras]

That is pretty impressive for the 1070 and about 5% faster than I expected. Oc'd that puts it at least in the neighborhood of 2x faster than a 390. I'm all over one of those once the FE pricing is out of the way.

 

[boozzer]

1070 have only 9% OC headroom.

how accurate is this? because oc headroom can make or break this gpu and 1080.

 

[Head1985]

What GPU score have GTX980Ti at 1500/8000?In firestrike Ultra..

 

[PhonakV30]

Faster than Titan X

GTX980 Ti at stock vs GTX 1070 at 1860Mhz :sneaky: yep slower than Custom GTX 980 Ti.

 

[Stuka87]

One of the first leaks showed 7.5GB

http://videocardz.com/59558/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-benchmarks

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11061015

What card is that?

Thats fake. If the 1070 had the same issue as the 970, it would be down 1GB, not 512MB.

 

[Bacon1]

Thats fake. If the 1070 had the same issue as the 970, it would be down 1GB, not 512MB.

So you are saying that 3dmark results can be easily faked?

 

[Face2Face]

NVM

 

[Head1985]

i have results for 980TI at 1500/8000
5026 GPU score..
Thats 13% faster than 1070 after OC.

 

[4K_shmoorK]

So you are saying that 3dmark results can be easily faked?

It's literally a photoshop, guy. Take it easy.

 

[Arachnotronic]

One of the first leaks showed 7.5GB

http://videocardz.com/59558/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-benchmarks

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11061015

What card is that?

Not the GTX 1070. Could you please not ruin this thread with unsubstantiated FUD? Thanks.