[VideoCardz] GTX 1070 Benchmarks

[Headfoot]

So you are saying that 3dmark results can be easily faked?

Photos on the internet can very easily be faked

 

[Arachnotronic]

Practically no 980Ti were sold with stock clocks. For example mine boosts to over 1420MHz at stock so it seems even after OC it won't match my stock card. Disappointing!

The 1070 isn't aimed at GTX 980 Ti owners...

 

[Bacon1]

It's literally a photoshop, guy. Take it easy.

Photos on the internet can very easily be faked

If only I'd listed the source in my post... oh wait, I did!

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11061015

So again, is it easy to fake 3dmark results?

Not the GTX 1070. Could you please not ruin this thread with unsubstantiated FUD? Thanks.

Says who? It was reported as the 1070 in the other post from Videocardz I linked. http://videocardz.com/59558/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-benchmarks


What makes this rumour more credible than that one? What is the card that I linked to then?

 

[Kenmitch]

Looks decent so far. Waiting for release and in game benches. Might work out fine for my son if he can get a decent one around $400.

 

[Det0x]

What GPU score have GTX980Ti at 1500/8000?In firestrike Ultra..

Please note where the stock Titan X and 980TI sits in relation to the chart in OP.. (17042 vs 15656 for the 980TI)

You can pretty much add 1.5 k points in score to the 980TI. (higher clocked cpu from videocardz?)

These supposedly leaked benchmark-scores resembles the usual PR Nvidia drivel we are used seeing, as they don't include the cards people actually owns. (non stock)

 

[Head1985]

I already have 980TI 1500/8000 results.
980TI is around 13% faster than 1070 after OC
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=38245197&postcount=23

 

[torlen11cc]

Does anyone know why is the Titan X so expensive?
Titan X =~ 980Ti performance
980Ti = 620$
Titan X = 1000$

 

[Actaeon]

If the 1070 is really 7.5GB I say it doesn't really matter. We are just starting to saturate 4GB even with the high rest textures and 4K. It would be a shitty thing to do but in a practical sense it would make no difference in performance.

Dropping from 4GB to 3.5GB was huge since many games get into that 3.5GB to 4GB range. The 7.5GB-8GB range is sufficient.

 

[crisium]

Does anyone know why is the Titan X so expensive?
Titan X =~ 980Ti performance
980Ti = 620$
Titan X = 1000$

9% more shaders, double the VRAM, and 50% more milk.

 

[n0x1ous]

9% more shaders, double the VRAM, and 50% more milk.

black paint!

 

[Arachnotronic]

Does anyone know why is the Titan X so expensive?
Titan X =~ 980Ti performance
980Ti = 620$
Titan X = 1000$

Early adopters tax. In a way, Titan X was 980 Ti Founders Edition

 

[Cookie Monster]

Depending on how P10 and 1070 custom boards turn out pricewise, might opt in. Definitely wont be getting the reference models.

 

[2blzd]

WHy is the VC&G community so toxic and negative?

the natural reaction to any news in here is always negative, and always about tearing down something else. Its always about what it DOESNT have, rather than what it does have. Its always about the "ifs" and "buts" never about whats actually in front of us.

We literally just got benchmarks confirming that a $379 card can beat last generations $1000 card. How can you not be excited or blown away by that?


Who cares if the relative performance to its higher performing brother is wider than the previous gen. Does it make the card any less fast or impressive? NO. If you're in the market for a 1070, you're in the market for a 1070. If you care so much about the difference between 970 and 980, go buy a 970 and brag to everyone how its only x% slower than a 980. Meanwhile the rest of the world will be enjoying a titan x for under $400.

This rhetoric and logic in here is getting really tired.

 

[4K_shmoorK]

WHy is the VC&G community so toxic and negative?

Don't know and its getting worse.

If only I'd listed the source in my post... oh wait, I did!

Why not wait for a verified 1070 3dmark result? Why be so absolute in your claims?

 

[boozzer]

Early adopters tax. In a way, Titan X was 980 Ti Founders Edition

that tax was 300$ for 3 months

 

[Bacon1]

Don't know and its getting worse.



Why not wait for a verified 1070 3dmark result? Why be so absolute in your claims?

I was asking a legitimate question and then was attacked by people who didn't even take the time to read my post.

Can 3dmark be easily faked or what card was posted with limited VRAM? Was it a 1070?

 

[Stuka87]

WHy is the VC&G community so toxic and negative?

the natural reaction to any news in here is always negative, and always about tearing down something else. Its always about what it DOESNT have, rather than what it does have. Its always about the "ifs" and "buts" never about whats actually in front of us.

We literally just got benchmarks confirming that a $379 card can beat last generations $1000 card. How can you not be excited or blown away by that?


Who cares if the relative performance to its higher performing brother is wider than the previous gen. Does it make the card any less fast or impressive? NO. If you're in the market for a 1070, you're in the market for a 1070. If you care so much about the difference between 970 and 980, go buy a 970 and brag to everyone how its only x% slower than a 980. Meanwhile the rest of the world will be enjoying a titan x for under $400.

This rhetoric and logic in here is getting really tired.

I hate to play in to what you are saying in this exact post, but everybody pretty much knows that we wont be seeing a $379 1070, just like we wont be seeing a $599 1080. Those prices were for reviews to show they are more competitive on price, even though there is no ETA on any cards that are that price. I am sure we may see those 6 months down the road, but after market cards with good coolers will be at or above FE prices.

However with that said, I think the 1070 will fill its part in the market fine. Its target audience are those with older Kepler cards. This will be a huge boost for anybody with a card of that generation. Very few people with a 980Ti are going to buy this or a 1080. Even at the FE price, the 1070 is a big boost in priceerformance vs the 980Ti.

 

[crisium]

We literally just got benchmarks confirming that a $379 card can beat last generations $1000 card. How can you not be excited or blown away by that?

Perhaps you will interpret this as negative, but it's not quite confirmed (although I believe the performance here is indicative), the FE is what is written about in the article and that's a $450 card, and a more accurate comparison is that it's beating last generations $650 card, since that is the card most consumers care about and is basically the same as the $1000 (actually the $650 card is faster at factory OC speeds, and is not even represented here).

Behold my nitpicking.

Behold discussion, god forbid. I genuinely think max OC 1070 vs max OC 980 Ti will be an interesting battle. It's worth discussing instead of just saying "yay" which I guess is your desire.

 

[4K_shmoorK]

I was asking a legitimate question and then was attacked by people who didn't even take the time to read my post.

Can 3dmark be easily faked or what card was posted with limited VRAM? Was it a 1070?

Who knows?

 

[sirmo]

I hate to play in to what you are saying in this exact post, but everybody pretty much knows that we wont be seeing a $379 1070, just like we wont be seeing a $599 1080. Those prices were for reviews to show they are more competitive on price, even though there is no ETA on any cards that are that price. I am sure we may see those 6 months down the road, but after market cards with good coolers will be at or above FE prices.

However with that said, I think the 1070 will fill its part in the market fine. Its target audience are those with older Kepler cards. This will be a huge boost for anybody with a card of that generation. Very few people with a 980Ti are going to buy this or a 1080. Even at the FE price, the 1070 is a big boost in priceerformance vs the 980Ti.

Spot on, especially with Kepler already being considered as legacy: http://www.nvidia.com/page/legacy.html

 

[Sweepr]

If this benchmark reflect gaming performance then Geforce GTX 1070 offers 80% Geforce GTX 1080's performance at 63% of the price. Geforce GTX 970 offered 85.9% Geforce GTX 980 at 60% of the (launch) price. Not a big difference like some people are implying.

We still have to see how custom Geforce GTX 1070 does in terms of overclocking. Highly overclocked Geforce GTX 980 Ti might be slightly faster today, but that can change with future titles, and it certainly draws much more power.

 

[Arachnotronic]

Spot on, especially with Kepler already being considered as legacy: http://www.nvidia.com/page/legacy.html

It's a more than four year old architecture. Why wouldn't it be considered legacy at this point?

 

[sirmo]

but that can change with future titles

Pascal is largely a Maxwell die shrink from what we now know. So I doubt you'll see an improvement on future titles. If anything both Maxwell and Pascal will likely fall behind AMD's GCN based GPUs.

 

[Actaeon]

It's a more than four year old architecture. Why wouldn't it be considered legacy at this point?

Because they were still selling as 'new' and 'current' less than 2 years ago.

 

[sirmo]

It's a more than four year old architecture. Why wouldn't it be considered legacy at this point?

780 was the "latest and greatest" from Nvidia as early as September 18, 2014 when 980 came out.

So that means less than 2 years of non legacy status. Pretty weak imo.