so you're endlessly butthurt that just about everyone but you has innumerable valid reasons to hate this spineless incompetent boob that you support--by far the least popular flesh bag ever to be elected POTUS?
It's one of the results of activist media, as they become more involved in protests and demonstrations they face higher and higher risk when they turn violent. They are no longer thought of as "neutral" parties just recording events, but as the drivers and inciters of the violence for profit and fame motives.
I'm not required, nor will I provide something that simple and easy for you. It's a blocked thread in this very forum, look it up for yourself.
Yes, because no one has ever heard of yellow journalism because it's such a newfangled thing.That's completely unverifiable yet well framed in a post-truth sort of way.
This thread will continue to watch various violent and criminal Anti-Trump protests that take place during his Presidency. If it's just a peaceful and constitutional protest it really shouldn't be included in this thread. There's always going to be some overlap, but try to focus on illegal and violent actions from the various hate groups opposed to President Trump.
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2017/01/20/protests-violence-prevalent-dc/
"“They began to destroy property, throw objects at people, through windows. A large percentage of this small group was armed with crowbars and hammers,” said the city’s interim police chief, Peter Newsham."
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...rotestors-vandalize-businesses-cars-kiosks-dc
"Footage shot by MRC Culture and CNSNews.com shows protestors vandalizing local businesses, destroying a limousine with hammers, spray-painting on walls and windows, smashing kiosks, and chanting “no cops, no borders, fight law and order.”
More to come, i'm sure.
Yes, because no one has ever heard of yellow journalism because it's such a newfangled thing.
Yep, we agree. We really need to take a look at what lies underneath. Perversely perhaps I got some crap, not a lot, when I said the same thing about populist movements in the US and Europe and that lumping them all as racist wasn't sufficient. Same mentality different sides.
I'm thinking that taking advantage of any label to avoid thought about any group isn't a wise thing to do, be it Trump or Europeans discontent with immigrants. Oh well, as you may have noticed I tend to gore a lot of oxen.
Pretty obvious why it's in your interest to ignored all data on the matter and the rather clear implication of white trump types blaming all their problems on mexicans picking fruit and busing tables.
liberals burning and destroying stuff because they didn't get their way? No way. The liberal news keeps telling us how its the right that is all destructive and deplorable.
When did the media actually incite riots? Oh right, they didn't. They have to cover protests because they're news. And did you really think no one would protest Trump given his hateful policies?
As MLK put it: "A riot is the language of the unheard." And when Trump refuses to listen to women, non-whites, LGBT people and anyone who isn't rich... well, that's a lot of unheard people. I don't think people should riot, but it's perfectly understandable why they are in these circumstances.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gullibleThey were Trump supporters trying to make liberals look bad. Least that's what I heard. Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gullible
Here's your sign.
Thought that was tattooed on your forehead, Comrade.
is this thread sponsored by Russia?
Yes. Reporting on stories that put class- and race-baiting liberals in a bad light is not to be permitted. It's commie propaganda. Watch the Women's March on RealNews(tm) and shut your mouth. Be a good little citizen. Everyone knows this.
millions of not only Americans, but people around the world marched peacefully today.
that's reality and factual, this thread is nothing more than attempt to cherry pick any potentially controversial incidences and portray that as the narrative instead of the millions of peaceful protesters.
it's typical propaganda.
very well said, and linking some rightwing news sites as a viable news source, eeesh. tajjy is nothing more than a whiny snowflake.so you're endlessly butthurt that just about everyone but you has innumerable valid reasons to hate this spineless incompetent boob that you support--by far the least popular flesh bag ever to be elected POTUS?
I'm surprised you even admit it was an assault.Yellow journalism is one thing. Claiming that the assault on Spencer was staged is entirely another.
"millions" what are you counting? It sure wasn't people.millions of not only Americans, but people around the world marched peacefully today.
that's reality and factual, this thread is nothing more than attempt to cherry pick any potentially controversial incidences and portray that as the narrative instead of the millions of peaceful protesters.
it's typical propaganda.
Some days I will play with you. Not feeling it today, sorry. Maybe you can convince others here of your claims about me. Good luck with that, but I don't really care either way. Please, continue looking foolish. I'll pay attention to those who are more thoughtful. K THX.
Yes. Reporting on stories that put class- and race-baiting liberals in a bad light is not to be permitted. It's commie propaganda. Watch the Women's March on RealNews(tm) and shut your mouth. Be a good little citizen. Everyone knows this.
Would you agree with Hayabusa Rider that people protesting against Trump are about equivalent to the whitenationalistssupremacists? Or are they worse as import claims?