Vista ANI Exploit Patch Plagued With More Problems

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

greylica

Senior member
Aug 11, 2006
276
0
0
I love you Nothinman, hauahuahauahuahau.

The single point that make me believe that Vista share the same code of XP is the same memory addressing problem that came out in Windows 2000 after service pack 2, in witch you cannot allocate more than 2Gb per application. It will be 10 years of an unsolved problem of Windows with the new Vista system, Page address extensions that came out in older Xeons Pentium II will never be used in 32 bit Windows Systems and even if you have a Xeon P4 capable of 48 bit PAE this feature cannot be used.
(Is 640K still sufficient for everyone ? )
I use Blender software, the code is capable to use 4GB per instance, in Windows, I'm limited to 2GB, in Linux, I can recode to use 16 Gb per instance even in 32 bit systems capable of PAE. ( Course the chipset haves to support it too, but a kernel flag of PAE enables the rest of Gibs to the kernell, even in SWAP mode with HDD).
 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
Originally posted by: greylica
I love you Nothinman, hauahuahauahuahau.

The single point that make me believe that Vista share the same code of XP is the same memory addressing problem that came out in Windows 2000 after service pack 2, in witch you cannot allocate more than 2Gb per application. It will be 10 years of an unsolved problem of Windows with the new Vista system, Page address extensions that came out in older Xeons Pentium II will never be used in 32 bit Windows Systems and even if you have a Xeon P4 capable of 48 bit PAE this feature cannot be used.
(Is 640K still sufficient for everyone ? )
I use Blender software, the code is capable to use 4GB per instance, in Windows, I'm limited to 2GB, in Linux, I can recode to use 16 Gb per instance even in 32 bit systems capable of PAE. ( Course the chipset haves to support it too, but a kernel flag of PAE enables the rest of Gibs to the kernell, even in SWAP mode with HDD).

How's that a problem with Windows?
The 2/2 kernel/application process address space isn't exactly unknown.
There's even a well documented boot switch(/3 or /3GB, I don't remember) for enabling a 1/3 split instead.

And it's not like Linux works differently(aside from the obvious).
 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Originally posted by: nerp
The whole "all information should be free" concept makes a lot of sense to people who want to steal copyrighted information and that's about it. Linux is very appealing to these people because it can be got for free. But for those of us who are actually in the content production business, know how much time and effort it takes and make a decent living doing it, the idea that all digital information should be free of all restrictions is a load of horse crap.

It's like whining about DRM. Big freaking deal. If you buy protected content, you'll have no problems. If you want to STEAL protected content, then by all means, whine away. If you hate DRM, don't buy protected content. Simple as that. And no, the DRM service DOES NOT affect non-protected content so here's a preemptive "SHUT UP."

Content producers and artists deserve to put limitations on their work because that's how capitalism works. If MS wants to craft an EULA restricting me from reverse engineering or pirating their OS, that's perfectly fine with me. I made the choice to buy Vista. Nobody forced me to do this. I can afford to buy software, music, movies and games. I get paid for my writing. I take no issue with other content producers expecting to get paid for theirs. And the fact of the matter is that I'll never be limited in what I want to do with my computer, regardless of my OS choice.

If you want to talk about proprietary, closed, restricted systems, stating that you support Apple is quite an interesting move to make in this discussion. It shows that one is more of a zealot, copy/pasting whatever fool on some advocacy forum spouts than an intelligent careful thinker. Do some actual research.

I run a slew of linux boxes, by the way. They have their place. But linux is crap for the desktop, the free alternatives to major apps (open office, gimp) blow chunks compared to actual professional tools (don't even try to tell me that they're just as good. Good enough for an adolescent writing bad poetry and putting photos on myspace maybe.)

Linux is great, but hardly an end-all solution and light years from being a solid desktop OS for everyone. If the linux community wants to beat MS and take over the desktop, they should stop worrying about advocacy and start rebuilding the os "from the ground up" to begin to come close to being usable for people who care more about their careers and accomplishing their work than whatever OS is running under the hood.

I'm sorry, but an OS shouldn't be a lifestyle choice. Using it simply because you "believe in it" is putting it in the realm of religion or philosophy. I'm sorry, but an operating system being such a source of passion is actually quite dorky. Use your computer, get your work done and shut up.

Nice rant... But you sound so much like a tool. I'm sorry.

First of all, "Protected Content" or DRM doesn't stop the problem these media companies are trying to protect. They are trying to protect their stuff from piracy which is NOT working. The only thing DRM is doing is making it inconvenient for the people who legally purchase their music. DRM is nothing more than a cover up for media corporations to squeeze more money out of the honest consumer.

Who cares about the Linux desktop? I never argued that the Linux desktop was the end all solution. lol. Use Windows XP. Just don't use Vista because your freedoms are taken away. That is what I'm saying.

So, your conclusion is irrelevant and nonsupporting of the topic.
 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
Originally posted by: Brazen
Originally posted by: xtknight
Originally posted by: ebaycj
Originally posted by: xtknight
Guess what? Every PC operating system will have that flaw. If you don't want them to, then get a new CPU with a different instruction set.


What flaw? The ANI flaw? If that's what you meant, you're completely wrong.

No. As described in the OP, the 'flaw' that new OSes are based off old ones.

So if I switch to Debian on PowerPC, then it won't be base off any previous version of Debian since switching architectures is your solution to that problem.

Not to PPC...maybe to a GPU with a completely different way of working, or something like that. My point is, there is no point to doing that. There's no point in getting rid of the base code if it works. There's no point in reengineering parts that have been proven stable, such as the "base" of XP. So the argument that it should be 'completely' reengeerined is stupid. It can not be completely reengineered, and even doing so would not necessarily solve problems. The "base" I'm talking about is the instructions that every x86 OS uses. You can't just use another instruction for no reason when there's only one that does what you want (e.g. a primitive instruction like "mov").

I'm saying that any x86 operating system will be based off another even if it's only about 10k of the same code (generic boot code, etc). Just because the whole thing wasn't completely changed doesn't mean most parts weren't reengineered. I imagine Vista has some old XP code in it. What if that old XP code was rock solid? "Old" doesn't make it unstable or undesirable. Usually, old code has actually been put through its paces more. In others, such as the ones Vista recoded, it had to be remade to conform to security standards (maybe redone with buffer overflow checking or whatever). You could say XP was 'based' on NT. Does that make it bad for home use? No, not at all. Only the 'base' was NT, as lots has changed above that. I imagine the same is true for Vista being 'based' on XP.

Originally posted by: gsellis
How in the heck can the OP be so dense to interpret "Built from the ground up" to mean "we wrote every line of code from scratch"?

This means they analyzed how everything was done and redesigned it and put it together. It does not mean that every technique ever used in the past was thrown away and they invented 100% new stuff. That would be like not using steel beams to build a building because they used them in the past. So instead, we tried cotton balls. Nobody has built a building using cotton balls before.

:disgust:

That's exactly my point.
 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
You will then realize the errors of your mistakes.

I really just want clarification of this phrase. I am wondering if this is really like a double negative making something positive. In other words, would an "error of my mistake" actually mean that I was correct in the first place?

Actually, the word "errors" and "mistakes" work along side each other. They don't negate each other. The errors are the direct result of the mistakes made. The person will realize or be aware of the errors caused by their mistakes.

Hopefully I was able to clarify for you.
 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Q, I'm well aware of what I'm getting into, and it has very little to do with TRUE lost freedoms. It's all about business. That may be a dirty word to some people, but business makes the world go round. As for me being imprisoned, well, be healthy dude, let ME decide what value I see in what. I can easily offer you this "freedom", without badgering, hyperbole and innuendo. Can't you do the same for me, and the rest of the folks here?

I've had Vista installed for all of 3-days now, and I'm very pleased with it. Nothing you can type is going to change this.

Here's some advice from a person who's probably been around a fair sight longer than you: seek out the company of people who share your passion for this, and feel superior to all of us poor fools who REALLY don't care about this issue as much as you.

I'm not going to switch my OS because you finally find the right combination of words to throw at me. I seriously doubt that anyone here will respond any differently.


What do you consider a TRUE freedom? If you buy a Microwave from me and then 2 months later I take it back. How would you feel? Cheated, wouldn't you? What makes Vista any different? If you bought it, it's yours. That is how everything works. According to Microsoft's EULA, you do NOT own Vista. You are merely renting it.

Your excuse is business. Does Windows XP prevent you from finishing this so called business you speak of? Would Linux or OS 10 prevent you from completing this business? Of course not. So, using "business" as an excuse is an old and tired one.

I've had Vista for much longer than you have. 3 days worth of experience is nothing. Try several months. You will then realize the errors of your mistakes. If you want to use Vista, then fine. Be my guest. However, you do realize that you are giving up a use that your computer once had; many uses in fact.

True freedom? Full ownership of myself and my labor. Being able to defend myself and my property. Do you need more?

Microsoft has no interest in taking Vista back, not from me at least. They do, however, have every right to protect their intellectual property, which I think is what you're moaning about. Also, just like most of the *NIX crowd, you seem to have a deep-seated problem with the idea of viewing personal computing as pay-for-play endeavor. If MS was composed of a bunch of socially-crippled dorks, sitting in a basement somewhere, giving you free sh*t, you'd be just fine with it. And yeah, BUSINESS isn't always pretty, but it's the way things work. You're going to HAVE to live with that, sooner or later. And NO, I have no interest in owning Vista. It's good enough for me, as a non-lawyer, non-recreational whiner to be able to "use" it under the current licensing agreement. Is that okay with you?

Hold on there, sir. Just because I've had Vista for 4-days now implies nothing, as you were obviously hoping it did. As I mentioned, I'm probably a lot older than you, and I've had a love affair with computers since I saw my first Star Trek episode in 1966. Figure the rest out for yourself, if you have enough brain power left between those bouts of misplaced moral outrage over things you'll NEVER be able to control.

Alright. As a person who simply had a neutral inquiry, you definitely are quite hostile in your recent post.

Lets start with the fact that you are throwing your age around. Your age has little to do with the fact that your rights are taken away. While you're sitting comfortably on your social security pension and your IRA withdrawals, I'm, in the mean time, working my behind off trying to make a living under an economy that could care less about me, a government that destroyed Social Security and has pushed back the retirement age for my generation. I'm working hard just so I can make a living. Harder than you ever had at my age. Don't make me bring up the fact that my generation competes with the rest of the world for jobs, competes with the rest of the world for education and competes with the rest of the world to just make an honest living. Gas prices super high, huge national debt left on our shoulders and a horrible world image. I'll be d*med if I buy something and told that I don't own it. If you aren't going to care, then someone else should.

I have nothing else to say.
 

erikistired

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2000
9,739
0
0
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Q, I'm well aware of what I'm getting into, and it has very little to do with TRUE lost freedoms. It's all about business. That may be a dirty word to some people, but business makes the world go round. As for me being imprisoned, well, be healthy dude, let ME decide what value I see in what. I can easily offer you this "freedom", without badgering, hyperbole and innuendo. Can't you do the same for me, and the rest of the folks here?

I've had Vista installed for all of 3-days now, and I'm very pleased with it. Nothing you can type is going to change this.

Here's some advice from a person who's probably been around a fair sight longer than you: seek out the company of people who share your passion for this, and feel superior to all of us poor fools who REALLY don't care about this issue as much as you.

I'm not going to switch my OS because you finally find the right combination of words to throw at me. I seriously doubt that anyone here will respond any differently.


What do you consider a TRUE freedom? If you buy a Microwave from me and then 2 months later I take it back. How would you feel? Cheated, wouldn't you? What makes Vista any different? If you bought it, it's yours. That is how everything works. According to Microsoft's EULA, you do NOT own Vista. You are merely renting it.

Your excuse is business. Does Windows XP prevent you from finishing this so called business you speak of? Would Linux or OS 10 prevent you from completing this business? Of course not. So, using "business" as an excuse is an old and tired one.

I've had Vista for much longer than you have. 3 days worth of experience is nothing. Try several months. You will then realize the errors of your mistakes. If you want to use Vista, then fine. Be my guest. However, you do realize that you are giving up a use that your computer once had; many uses in fact.

True freedom? Full ownership of myself and my labor. Being able to defend myself and my property. Do you need more?

Microsoft has no interest in taking Vista back, not from me at least. They do, however, have every right to protect their intellectual property, which I think is what you're moaning about. Also, just like most of the *NIX crowd, you seem to have a deep-seated problem with the idea of viewing personal computing as pay-for-play endeavor. If MS was composed of a bunch of socially-crippled dorks, sitting in a basement somewhere, giving you free sh*t, you'd be just fine with it. And yeah, BUSINESS isn't always pretty, but it's the way things work. You're going to HAVE to live with that, sooner or later. And NO, I have no interest in owning Vista. It's good enough for me, as a non-lawyer, non-recreational whiner to be able to "use" it under the current licensing agreement. Is that okay with you?

Hold on there, sir. Just because I've had Vista for 4-days now implies nothing, as you were obviously hoping it did. As I mentioned, I'm probably a lot older than you, and I've had a love affair with computers since I saw my first Star Trek episode in 1966. Figure the rest out for yourself, if you have enough brain power left between those bouts of misplaced moral outrage over things you'll NEVER be able to control.

Alright. As a person who simply had a neutral inquiry, you definitely are quite hostile in your recent post.

Lets start with the fact that you are throwing your age around. Your age has little to do with the fact that your rights are taken away. While you're sitting comfortably on your social security pension and your IRA withdrawals, I'm, in the mean time, working my behind off trying to make a living under an economy that could care less about me, a government that destroyed Social Security and has pushed back the retirement age for my generation. I'm working hard just so I can make a living. Harder than you ever had at my age. Don't make me bring up the fact that my generation competes with the rest of the world for jobs, competes with the rest of the world for education and competes with the rest of the world to just make an honest living. Gas prices super high, huge national debt left on our shoulders and a horrible world image. I'll be d*med if I buy something and told that I don't own it. If you aren't going to care, then someone else should.

I have nothing else to say.

i'm probably closer to your age Q than his, but even i know you are retarded if you think you have it harder these days.

edit: actually, i'm probably not. but you are still wrong.
 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Originally posted by: fisher
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Originally posted by: HardWarrior
Q, I'm well aware of what I'm getting into, and it has very little to do with TRUE lost freedoms. It's all about business. That may be a dirty word to some people, but business makes the world go round. As for me being imprisoned, well, be healthy dude, let ME decide what value I see in what. I can easily offer you this "freedom", without badgering, hyperbole and innuendo. Can't you do the same for me, and the rest of the folks here?

I've had Vista installed for all of 3-days now, and I'm very pleased with it. Nothing you can type is going to change this.

Here's some advice from a person who's probably been around a fair sight longer than you: seek out the company of people who share your passion for this, and feel superior to all of us poor fools who REALLY don't care about this issue as much as you.

I'm not going to switch my OS because you finally find the right combination of words to throw at me. I seriously doubt that anyone here will respond any differently.


What do you consider a TRUE freedom? If you buy a Microwave from me and then 2 months later I take it back. How would you feel? Cheated, wouldn't you? What makes Vista any different? If you bought it, it's yours. That is how everything works. According to Microsoft's EULA, you do NOT own Vista. You are merely renting it.

Your excuse is business. Does Windows XP prevent you from finishing this so called business you speak of? Would Linux or OS 10 prevent you from completing this business? Of course not. So, using "business" as an excuse is an old and tired one.

I've had Vista for much longer than you have. 3 days worth of experience is nothing. Try several months. You will then realize the errors of your mistakes. If you want to use Vista, then fine. Be my guest. However, you do realize that you are giving up a use that your computer once had; many uses in fact.

True freedom? Full ownership of myself and my labor. Being able to defend myself and my property. Do you need more?

Microsoft has no interest in taking Vista back, not from me at least. They do, however, have every right to protect their intellectual property, which I think is what you're moaning about. Also, just like most of the *NIX crowd, you seem to have a deep-seated problem with the idea of viewing personal computing as pay-for-play endeavor. If MS was composed of a bunch of socially-crippled dorks, sitting in a basement somewhere, giving you free sh*t, you'd be just fine with it. And yeah, BUSINESS isn't always pretty, but it's the way things work. You're going to HAVE to live with that, sooner or later. And NO, I have no interest in owning Vista. It's good enough for me, as a non-lawyer, non-recreational whiner to be able to "use" it under the current licensing agreement. Is that okay with you?

Hold on there, sir. Just because I've had Vista for 4-days now implies nothing, as you were obviously hoping it did. As I mentioned, I'm probably a lot older than you, and I've had a love affair with computers since I saw my first Star Trek episode in 1966. Figure the rest out for yourself, if you have enough brain power left between those bouts of misplaced moral outrage over things you'll NEVER be able to control.

Alright. As a person who simply had a neutral inquiry, you definitely are quite hostile in your recent post.

Lets start with the fact that you are throwing your age around. Your age has little to do with the fact that your rights are taken away. While you're sitting comfortably on your social security pension and your IRA withdrawals, I'm, in the mean time, working my behind off trying to make a living under an economy that could care less about me, a government that destroyed Social Security and has pushed back the retirement age for my generation. I'm working hard just so I can make a living. Harder than you ever had at my age. Don't make me bring up the fact that my generation competes with the rest of the world for jobs, competes with the rest of the world for education and competes with the rest of the world to just make an honest living. Gas prices super high, huge national debt left on our shoulders and a horrible world image. I'll be d*med if I buy something and told that I don't own it. If you aren't going to care, then someone else should.

I have nothing else to say.

i'm probably closer to your age Q than his, but even i know you are retarded if you think you have it harder these days.

edit: actually, i'm probably not. but you are still wrong.

Retarded?! Are you blind?!

Our generation grew up without any sense of entitlement. It is the older generation that had everything handed to them on a plate. They could get out of college, buy a house and support a family on the income they had. Even then, college wasn?t necessary: high school was fine enough to move along with in life. A ?good? student back then got a 3.0, whereas now, a HS diploma is looked at as a joke, and anything less than a near 4.0 is just plain sad.. They could add a car to that without a problem. They had great and cheap gas prices. Social Security was a massive safety net that they could rely on. America was viewed as a "Free" country. Even my Chinese teacher told me that when she was a kid, there was a rumor that "milk came out of the water fountains in America". They had it pretty damned well if you ask me.

They grew up in the generation where "if you graduate as an engineer, you are guaranteed a well paying job"... Now, if you can't at least get a 3.3, you are dropped from consideration from many jobs (yet I still notice old people spreading that lie ? woe to the engineer who thinks being an engineer means making a lot of money. They should go to economics or business. Working with money makes you money). A person even once had a recruiter come and tell them "I would have never been able to compete with the people today... I got out of college with a 2.0 in Chemical Engineering and easily got my well paying job to propel me to the level I am today. You guys have to be sooo much more competitive today."

Look at our generation today: Going to college today means nothing. If you can't convert your 4 years into something practical and useful, you are no better than someone with a high school degree. Wecan't afford a place coming out of college: even with a 50,000 dollar year income (which is above the starting salary for average engineers. It's pretty great for a lot of humanities or social science majors.) you can't afford to own any real place. ESPECIALLY in a place like Southern and Northern California. Take it to a 75,000 dollar starting college income (which is VERY good? Means we get to keep about 55k as our income) and its still not enough to own your own house. Even if you have a college educated spouse who also works. A combined income from two college graduates won't automatically imply anything great! WE have the ****** up gas prices, we have the ****** up foreign policy, the tarnished image abroad, debt in the trillions and a government (republican or democrat) that doesn't understand what WISE spending is. WE are left and stuck with everything WRONG with Social Security: remember, they keep pulling out SS funds to fund their bullshit only to leave enough to support their generation and screw us over with it! WE are stuck with rising health care costs and pills that cost hundreds of dollars (largely because it is the OLDER generation that has ****** up health, so we have to pay massively expensive premiums because of that!) WE are told how much of a ****** up and failed generation we are when the PARENTS THAT RAISED THIS GENERATION were the ones who did a ****** job raising their kids in front of a TV. They were the ones letting divorce rates sky rocket to 60% and getting high on a culture of drugs all day long.

So here we are: the older generation got the better of everything from World Image, to low house prices (well? Low prices in ANYTHING if you consider inflation!), to gas, to social security, to the lack of personal responsibility. Now they come and bitch at us when WE complain about their screw ups and how we worked 100 times harder than they ever did, so we should get a cut!

They need to know that our generation has to play by a much different set of rules: we live in a global world now and we have to compete with others on a much bigger stage -- where it is becoming exponentially more difficult to stand out. All this is part of globalization as many things begin to transcend to international boundaries. It isn't only one thing that I am critiquing. Tying our hands behind our back while we compete with 100 times more people than they ever did isn't going to help us! The older generation just had to consider playing with each other... We have to consider competing against the Indians, Chinese and any other group on a global scale. Forty, thirty, twenty, even FIFTEEN years ago I would have rather been the "average" student in middle America... Now, I would rather be the genius in Shanghai. I'll take being the Arab In SoCal too. Sometimes I wonder if I really will live forever in the USA and not somewhere else!

The older generation needs to shut their trap and stop making us think that we have a entitlement complex, because they ****** 90% of things that they will pass to us...including raising most of us! Their mentality will not help us at all as the world gets more competitive!
With all that SAID, I agree that people in our generation do think like that, but only because their parents also got it all.
 

Madwand1

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2006
3,309
0
76
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Originally their TCP/IP stack had large chunks of BSD code, I think the cli ftp client even still had the BSD copyright in the binary, but I don't know if that's still true and it wasn't from Linux anyway.

This is in the Vista ftp client:

Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
All rights reserved
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
The single point that make me believe that Vista share the same code of XP is the same memory addressing problem that came out in Windows 2000 after service pack 2, in witch you cannot allocate more than 2Gb per application

That's a 32-bit hardware limtation and has almost nothing to do with Windows at all. On a 32-bit system you can only address 4G at once and MS decided to split that 4G right down the middle so the kernel gets 2G and each process gets 2G, Linux chose a 3/1 split so each process gets 3G but squeezing everything into that 1G can be a problem at times and the split is configurable since Linux is open source.

It will be 10 years of an unsolved problem of Windows with the new Vista system, Page address extensions that came out in older Xeons Pentium II will never be used in 32 bit Windows Systems and even if you have a Xeon P4 capable of 48 bit PAE this feature cannot be used.

Windows supports PAE just fine but that doesn't change the fact that 32-bit systems only have 4G of VM. The amount of physical memory supported is completely unrelated to the amount of VM supported and Windows Server goes up to 8G and I believe Advanced Server and Datacenter Server support 16G and 64G respectively.

I use Blender software, the code is capable to use 4GB per instance, in Windows, I'm limited to 2GB, in Linux, I can recode to use 16 Gb per instance even in 32 bit systems capable of PAE. ( Course the chipset haves to support it too, but a kernel flag of PAE enables the rest of Gibs to the kernell, even in SWAP mode with HDD).

The hell you can. On Linux 32-bit processes are limited to 4G at the very max and that's with the custom 4/4 split patches which slow down the entire system to provide that much memory per-process. On both Windows and Linux 32-bit processes can work around the issue by dynamically swapping around mmap()'d memory regions (there's a library called AWE to handle that for you on Windows) but it is 100% impossible for a 32-bit process to directly address >4G of memory under any OS.

Please, if you're going to complain about Windows at least make sure you have your facts straight first.

Nice rant... But you sound so much like a tool. I'm sorry.

Now that's ironic, coming from Quinton.

I have nothing else to say.

If only that were true...
 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Did your computer start to give you a DLL error after rebooting? Well, bad luck: it?s that pesky Windows Animated Cursor patch issued by Microsoft?

By now you are probably familiarized with the 3-months old bug discovered by security vendor Determina in December 2006 that refers to a boundary error within the handling of animated cursors. If you?re not, you should know that the flaw, also known as ANI exploit, can be, well? exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via a specially crafted animated cursor file.

Successful exploitation could have allowed the execution of an arbitrary code when a user e.g. visits a malicious website using Internet Explorer or opens a malicious e-mail message.

The vulnerability first surfaced last week, when Microsoft acknowledged ongoing attacks. Most of the activity around the ANI exploit has been observed via malicious websites (around 100) that will attack the user if he visits the page with the most common versions of Internet Explorer (6 or 7), serving him/her with bogus Web-pages that take advantage of the bug.

Last weekend the amount of attacks using this exploit has intensified, forcing Microsoft to admit the existence of the bug and to speed up the patching process.

On April 4, Microsoft finally issued a software patch to fix the critical vulnerability that affected its Windows OS. It was only the third patch since January 2005 to be posted outside the normal monthly schedule. It also addressed six other vulnerabilities, three of them affecting Windows Vista.

However, immediately after the update was installed and the computer rebooted, Windows XP SP 2 users with an integrated Realtek HD Audio Control Panel (that includes me and three other computers in my office) were confronted with a DLL error, called RTHDCPL.EXE-Illegal System Relocation:

"The system DLL user32.dll was relocated in memory. The application will not
run properly. The relocation occured because the DLL C:\WINDOWS\system32\HHCTRL.OCX occupied an address range reserved for Windows system DLLs. The vendor supplying the DLL should be contacted for a new DLL."

The rthdcpl.exe is located in the folder C:\Windows. The file size on Windows XP is 13179660 bytes. There is an icon for this program on the taskbar next to the clock. It is not a Windows system file. The file is a Microsoft signed file. rthdcpl.exe is able to record inputs.

Microsoft became aware of it only after reports began emerging on the Web and immediately issued a fix located at this address.

However, users have complained that the fix does not always work and that it sometimes comes in conflict with the Windows Genuine Advantage Validation program, which hinders the downloading of the fix. Microsoft promises to update the aforementioned Knowledge Base article as soon as they have more details available from both users and their engineers.
http://www.playfuls.com/news_06876_Micr...tch_Causes_DLL_Errors_at_Startup_.html


More problems for Vista and just about every other Windows OS.
 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Did your computer start to give you a DLL error after rebooting? Well, bad luck: it?s that pesky Windows Animated Cursor patch issued by Microsoft?

By now you are probably familiarized with the 3-months old bug discovered by security vendor Determina in December 2006 that refers to a boundary error within the handling of animated cursors. If you?re not, you should know that the flaw, also known as ANI exploit, can be, well? exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via a specially crafted animated cursor file.

Successful exploitation could have allowed the execution of an arbitrary code when a user e.g. visits a malicious website using Internet Explorer or opens a malicious e-mail message.

The vulnerability first surfaced last week, when Microsoft acknowledged ongoing attacks. Most of the activity around the ANI exploit has been observed via malicious websites (around 100) that will attack the user if he visits the page with the most common versions of Internet Explorer (6 or 7), serving him/her with bogus Web-pages that take advantage of the bug.

Last weekend the amount of attacks using this exploit has intensified, forcing Microsoft to admit the existence of the bug and to speed up the patching process.

On April 4, Microsoft finally issued a software patch to fix the critical vulnerability that affected its Windows OS. It was only the third patch since January 2005 to be posted outside the normal monthly schedule. It also addressed six other vulnerabilities, three of them affecting Windows Vista.

However, immediately after the update was installed and the computer rebooted, Windows XP SP 2 users with an integrated Realtek HD Audio Control Panel (that includes me and three other computers in my office) were confronted with a DLL error, called RTHDCPL.EXE-Illegal System Relocation:

"The system DLL user32.dll was relocated in memory. The application will not
run properly. The relocation occured because the DLL C:\WINDOWS\system32\HHCTRL.OCX occupied an address range reserved for Windows system DLLs. The vendor supplying the DLL should be contacted for a new DLL."

The rthdcpl.exe is located in the folder C:\Windows. The file size on Windows XP is 13179660 bytes. There is an icon for this program on the taskbar next to the clock. It is not a Windows system file. The file is a Microsoft signed file. rthdcpl.exe is able to record inputs.

Microsoft became aware of it only after reports began emerging on the Web and immediately issued a fix located at this address.

However, users have complained that the fix does not always work and that it sometimes comes in conflict with the Windows Genuine Advantage Validation program, which hinders the downloading of the fix. Microsoft promises to update the aforementioned Knowledge Base article as soon as they have more details available from both users and their engineers.
http://www.playfuls.com/news_06876_Micr...tch_Causes_DLL_Errors_at_Startup_.html


More problems for Vista and just about every other Windows OS.
Are you retarded? Did you even READ what you just posted?
 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Did your computer start to give you a DLL error after rebooting? Well, bad luck: it?s that pesky Windows Animated Cursor patch issued by Microsoft?

By now you are probably familiarized with the 3-months old bug discovered by security vendor Determina in December 2006 that refers to a boundary error within the handling of animated cursors. If you?re not, you should know that the flaw, also known as ANI exploit, can be, well? exploited to cause a stack-based buffer overflow via a specially crafted animated cursor file.

Successful exploitation could have allowed the execution of an arbitrary code when a user e.g. visits a malicious website using Internet Explorer or opens a malicious e-mail message.

The vulnerability first surfaced last week, when Microsoft acknowledged ongoing attacks. Most of the activity around the ANI exploit has been observed via malicious websites (around 100) that will attack the user if he visits the page with the most common versions of Internet Explorer (6 or 7), serving him/her with bogus Web-pages that take advantage of the bug.

Last weekend the amount of attacks using this exploit has intensified, forcing Microsoft to admit the existence of the bug and to speed up the patching process.

On April 4, Microsoft finally issued a software patch to fix the critical vulnerability that affected its Windows OS. It was only the third patch since January 2005 to be posted outside the normal monthly schedule. It also addressed six other vulnerabilities, three of them affecting Windows Vista.

However, immediately after the update was installed and the computer rebooted, Windows XP SP 2 users with an integrated Realtek HD Audio Control Panel (that includes me and three other computers in my office) were confronted with a DLL error, called RTHDCPL.EXE-Illegal System Relocation:

"The system DLL user32.dll was relocated in memory. The application will not
run properly. The relocation occured because the DLL C:\WINDOWS\system32\HHCTRL.OCX occupied an address range reserved for Windows system DLLs. The vendor supplying the DLL should be contacted for a new DLL."

The rthdcpl.exe is located in the folder C:\Windows. The file size on Windows XP is 13179660 bytes. There is an icon for this program on the taskbar next to the clock. It is not a Windows system file. The file is a Microsoft signed file. rthdcpl.exe is able to record inputs.

Microsoft became aware of it only after reports began emerging on the Web and immediately issued a fix located at this address.

However, users have complained that the fix does not always work and that it sometimes comes in conflict with the Windows Genuine Advantage Validation program, which hinders the downloading of the fix. Microsoft promises to update the aforementioned Knowledge Base article as soon as they have more details available from both users and their engineers.
http://www.playfuls.com/news_06876_Micr...tch_Causes_DLL_Errors_at_Startup_.html


More problems for Vista and just about every other Windows OS.
Are you retarded? Did you even READ what you just posted?

Are you retarded? Did you even READ what I just posted?
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Are you retarded? Did you even READ what you just posted?

Are you retarded? Did you even READ what I just posted?
Go over your pet article again, careful-like, then re-read your chosen punchline and see if you spot your mistake.


Oh, and for those who are interested in what issues that the MS07-017 update might cause, without added editorial hysteria, here's the relevant link: info at Microsoft
Note As of April 5, 2007, Microsoft is aware of the following third-party programs that are affected by this problem:

? Realtek HD Audio Control Panel
? ElsterFormular 2006/2007
? TUGZip
? CD-Tag

If you receive a similar message when you use other programs, install the update that is mentioned in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448. If we confirm that other programs are affected by this problem, we will update Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448 with more information.
 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Are you retarded? Did you even READ what you just posted?

Are you retarded? Did you even READ what I just posted?
Go over your pet article again, careful-like, then re-read your chosen punchline and see if you spot your mistake.


Oh, and for those who are interested in what issues that the MS07-017 update might cause, without added editorial hysteria, here's the relevant link: info at Microsoft
Note As of April 5, 2007, Microsoft is aware of the following third-party programs that are affected by this problem:

? Realtek HD Audio Control Panel
? ElsterFormular 2006/2007
? TUGZip
? CD-Tag

If you receive a similar message when you use other programs, install the update that is mentioned in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448. If we confirm that other programs are affected by this problem, we will update Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448 with more information.

Did you even bother reading the first post of the thread? There are two links available to you. *Sighs*
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Two links from unknown webpages... Brilliant!

A few problems with a handful of obscure programs... Brilliant!

You've convinced me. I'm getting rid of all of my Vista machines right now.
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Are you retarded? Did you even READ what you just posted?

Are you retarded? Did you even READ what I just posted?
Go over your pet article again, careful-like, then re-read your chosen punchline and see if you spot your mistake.


Oh, and for those who are interested in what issues that the MS07-017 update might cause, without added editorial hysteria, here's the relevant link: info at Microsoft
Note As of April 5, 2007, Microsoft is aware of the following third-party programs that are affected by this problem:

? Realtek HD Audio Control Panel
? ElsterFormular 2006/2007
? TUGZip
? CD-Tag

If you receive a similar message when you use other programs, install the update that is mentioned in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448. If we confirm that other programs are affected by this problem, we will update Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448 with more information.

Did you even bother reading the first post of the thread? There are two links available to you. *Sighs*
So are you going to correct your error yet?

Oh, and is this you here, Quinton McLeod? http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/misc/191-hard-drive-failure-linux.html
A friend of mine is having issues with his Linux. When attempting to access his HD, he gets these errors:

/dev/hdh1: Invalid argument while reading block 134236528

/dev/hdh1: Invalid argument reading journal superblock

fsck.ext3: Invalid argument while checking ext3 journal for /dev/hdh1


I know nothing about Linux, so I couldn't help him, but hopefully someone here can. What exactly do these errors mean and what should be done to fix them?

Thanks
(someone wanna give him a hand here?)
You've convinced me. I'm getting rid of all of my Vista machines right now.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,136
4,831
136
Well I made the mistake of installing that update and blam my retail ultimate was no longer genuine. I had to boot off the dvd and use system restore to return my pc back to the preinstall condition. MS you suck! I also had a problem with my ms wireless laser mouse 6000 not working most of the time and would be frozen when I'd boot my machine. I'd have to keep on rebooting until my mouse was not frozen. Just replaced it with a logitech mx revolution and the problem is solved. MS needs to get its sh!t together and not keep on dumping garbage out onto its paying customer base.
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
Originally posted by: Puffnstuff
Well I made the mistake of installing that update and blam my retail ultimate was no longer genuine.
That would be a valid issue there. Did you try reactivating? If so, what happened?

 

Quinton McLeod

Senior member
Jan 17, 2006
375
0
0
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
Originally posted by: mechBgon
Are you retarded? Did you even READ what you just posted?

Are you retarded? Did you even READ what I just posted?
Go over your pet article again, careful-like, then re-read your chosen punchline and see if you spot your mistake.


Oh, and for those who are interested in what issues that the MS07-017 update might cause, without added editorial hysteria, here's the relevant link: info at Microsoft
Note As of April 5, 2007, Microsoft is aware of the following third-party programs that are affected by this problem:

? Realtek HD Audio Control Panel
? ElsterFormular 2006/2007
? TUGZip
? CD-Tag

If you receive a similar message when you use other programs, install the update that is mentioned in Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448. If we confirm that other programs are affected by this problem, we will update Microsoft Knowledge Base article 935448 with more information.

Did you even bother reading the first post of the thread? There are two links available to you. *Sighs*
So are you going to correct your error yet?

Oh, and is this you here, Quinton McLeod? http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/misc/191-hard-drive-failure-linux.html
A friend of mine is having issues with his Linux. When attempting to access his HD, he gets these errors:

/dev/hdh1: Invalid argument while reading block 134236528

/dev/hdh1: Invalid argument reading journal superblock

fsck.ext3: Invalid argument while checking ext3 journal for /dev/hdh1


I know nothing about Linux, so I couldn't help him, but hopefully someone here can. What exactly do these errors mean and what should be done to fix them?

Thanks
(someone wanna give him a hand here?)
You've convinced me. I'm getting rid of all of my Vista machines right now.

lol. That was 5 years ago. My friend KMR is Japanese and he was using Fedora Core 3. He lives in Japan currently (and he did back then too). At the time, I didn't know anything about Linux and I was interested in Linux at the time. I just got into Linux about 2 years ago and never looked back!

What error did I make, btw?
 

mechBgon

Super Moderator<br>Elite Member
Oct 31, 1999
30,699
1
0
What error did I make, btw?
Probably the same one that loup garou is thinking of Namely, your chosen articles are mentioning problems that only affect WinXP, whereas you conclude them by saying it's more problems for Vista.

What I'm not sure about, is why you bother with your anti-Microsoft baloney here. This isn't P&N. If you want to promote Linux, then... promote Linux. Trying to promote Linux by dissing Microsoft only makes you look like the proverbial dog in the manger (or maybe an escapee from P&N :evil: )

In practical terms, if you want to promote Linux, then if you make one simple web page helping newbies try it out, that will make infinitely more difference than trolling ATOS with every pathetic little anti-Microsoft issue you can dredge up. That would be the equivalent of me going around trolling against Dells, HPs, eMachines and other pre-built computers, instead of showing how to build one's own. Which tactic do you think works, the negative or the positive?

"Oh great, there's mechBgon the anti-Dell troll again :roll: I wish he'd just go AWAY."

versus

"Sweet, this guide is in plain English with pics! :Q Shoot, I can do this part... and this part... heck, I can do the whole thing, I'm gonna do it. *orders pizza*"

When people start PMing you to ask how to fix Linux problems, you'll know you're making some impact. So let's see less trolling and more positive-type stuff, eh You'll eventually earn some respect if you stick with it.

Cliffs: it's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,136
4,831
136
When I tried to boot after installing the update windows wouldn't let me get past the activation screen. I tried retyping my key which it promptly rejected and basically I couldn't get past that screen. I then booted off the dvd with the network cable disconnected and used system restore to bring it back to the save point before I installed the update and rebooted. Everything works after I did that however I will not reinstall the update. There's a pile of threads over at ms forums about a huge number of different issues including the deactivation of a valid windows install. MS really screwed the pooch on this one.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Quinton McLeod
What error did I make, btw?

Perusal of this thread suggests the list is pretty large.

Take your Linux fanatic crap somewhere else.

There's a reason Linux isn't adopted on the desktop, and the legions of fanboys who act just like you are a big part of it.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |