- Jan 17, 2006
- 375
- 0
- 0
I was given a URL to a benchmark showing great gains with the ATI driver in Vista from FiringSquad.
It was in response to a link I gave earlier:
http://techgage.com/article/windows_vista_gaming_performance_reports
Of course, there were no Windows XP comparisons in that FiringSquad URL.
But then, I came across two other benchmarks saying the same thing:
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=354&type=expert&pid=6
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page4.html#3d_games
So, what's going on? Why are you people deliberately leaving this tidbit out? I noticed that no one on these forums even mentioned the fact that gaming has taken a nose dive from XP to Vista. Even with Aero off, XP still outperforms it.
I want honest opinions about this. What is your take on these current chain of events?
Discuss!
It was in response to a link I gave earlier:
http://techgage.com/article/windows_vista_gaming_performance_reports
Of course, there were no Windows XP comparisons in that FiringSquad URL.
But then, I came across two other benchmarks saying the same thing:
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=354&type=expert&pid=6
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page4.html#3d_games
So, what's going on? Why are you people deliberately leaving this tidbit out? I noticed that no one on these forums even mentioned the fact that gaming has taken a nose dive from XP to Vista. Even with Aero off, XP still outperforms it.
I want honest opinions about this. What is your take on these current chain of events?
Discuss!