Vmodtech (Thai) FULL Fury X Review!

[guskline]

Site now appears to be taken off.

 

[DDH]

had a look at some benches before it was taken down. seemed competitive to a 980ti in stock form, but didnt beat it by much if at all in the ones i saw.

 

[slayernine]

had a look at some benches before it was taken down. seemed competitive to a 980ti in stock form, but didnt beat it by much if at all in the ones i saw.

Yeah I got a view of the Witcher 3 4K (the game I currently care about) and it has a decent edge on 980 ti. They focused a lot on OC benchmarks, I don't usually bother overclocking my graphics cards. I prefer to have stability over a couple frames more performance. However it leaves me with some questions:

1. Is the overclock they showed on the 980 ti easily obtainable without raising voltages and messing around alot? Stock cooling?

2. Was that tiny overclock all they could squeeze out of the R9 Fury X? The card is watercooled, I would think it could OC a bit more.

 

[AnandThenMan]

In Crysis 3 the OC'd 280x was only 8fps behind the stock clocked Fury. Seems legit.

 

[DDH]

Yeah I got a view of the Witcher 3 4K (the game I currently care about) and it has a decent edge on 980 ti. They focused a lot on OC benchmarks, I don't usually bother overclocking my graphics cards. I prefer to have stability over a couple frames more performance. However it leaves me with some questions:

1. Is the overclock they showed on the 980 ti easily obtainable without raising voltages and messing around alot? Stock cooling?

2. Was that tiny overclock all they could squeeze out of the R9 Fury X? The card is watercooled, I would think it could OC a bit more.

it was large. over 1300mhz, titan was over 1200. Assuming they were both non boosted clocks.

the 980 oc was over 1300 mhz to and was biting at the heels of the furyx stock.

 

[.vodka]

In Crysis 3 the OC'd 280x was only 8fps behind the stock clocked Fury. Seems legit.

LOL

Only a few hours to go for useful reviews.

 

[crisium]

LOL

Only a few hours to go for useful reviews.

As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.

Why don't all sites do this?

Ryan Smith, why do you not show OC of all competing cards?

I like that this site does this. The numbers they have are questionable, but thank you for showing OC vs Stock for a multitude of cards.

Will Ryan Smith in a few hours show us OC of 980 Ti and Titan X and Fury X and lower performing cards?

Doubtful.

Prove me wrong, Mr. Smith. Punish me if you have OC and Stock for Fury X, Titan X, 980 Ti, 980, and at least another card. I dare you to match a nobody, inconsistent Asian site.

 

[slayernine]

In Crysis 3 the OC'd 280x was only 8fps behind the stock clocked Fury. Seems legit.

It’s the card that made the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs.

 

[AnandThenMan]

As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.

I don't like when sites do this, especially for a new GPU launch. It muddies the water in part because OC'ing is never a sure thing. Stock versus stock, OC'd for all cards in a separate article.

 

[2is]

I'd rather have a comprehensive review for both stock and OC than to separate the two. It's not that hard to figure out what's what since it's documented.

 

[flopper]

2. Was that tiny overclock all they could squeeze out of the R9 Fury X? The card is watercooled, I would think it could OC a bit more.

the OC will be needing voltage adjustments and that atm havent been seen.

 

[sam_816]

As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.

Why don't all sites do this?

Ryan Smith, why do you not show OC of all competing cards?

I like that this site does this. The numbers they have are questionable, but thank you for showing OC vs Stock for a multitude of cards.

Will Ryan Smith in a few hours show us OC of 980 Ti and Titan X and Fury X and lower performing cards?

Doubtful.

Prove me wrong, Mr. Smith. Punish me if you have OC and Stock for Fury X, Titan X, 980 Ti, 980, and at least another card. I dare you to match a nobody, inconsistent Asian site.

Who's Ryan Smith? Why are you after his life?lol!!

Only 5 hours to go..

 

[5150Joker]

I have a feeling these guys used an old driver or botched their runs. The numbers don't seem right--I thought I was looking at 390x numbers rather than Fury.

As sad as this review is for consistency (they probably did 1 pass?) at least they showed stock and OC for most cards.

Why don't all sites do this?

Ryan Smith, why do you not show OC of all competing cards?

I like that this site does this. The numbers they have are questionable, but thank you for showing OC vs Stock for a multitude of cards.

Will Ryan Smith in a few hours show us OC of 980 Ti and Titan X and Fury X and lower performing cards?

Doubtful.

Prove me wrong, Mr. Smith. Punish me if you have OC and Stock for Fury X, Titan X, 980 Ti, 980, and at least another card. I dare you to match a nobody, inconsistent Asian site.

AT did OC their Titan X review sample but it's true that most sites barely dedicate a page to OC results and they are typically very underwhelming.

 

[flopper]

I have a feeling these guys used an old driver or botched their runs. The numbers don't seem right--I thought I was looking at 390x numbers rather than Fury.

its crap

 

[iiiankiii]

This review=does not compute

Everything is out of wack.

 

[Flapdrol1337]

They're testing at 1920x1080, I reckon they're often cpu bound.

 

[vissarix]

Im patiently waiting for Amd fanboys excuses for another fail...

hint: yes but it runs cooler, yes but its smaller, yes but wait for windows 10 hotfix which will release full power...etc.

Infraction issued for trolling.
-- stahlhart

 

[jantjeuh]

Im patiently waiting for Amd fanboys excuses for another fail...

hint: yes but it runs cooler, yes but its smaller, yes but wait for windows 10 hotfix which will release full power...etc.

Let's wait for benchmarks from a proper review site before labeling the Fury a 'fail', please.

 

[DarkKnightDude]

its better to keep the overclocked results on a separate page.

 

[IEC]

Im patiently waiting for Amd fanboys excuses for another fail...

hint: yes but it runs cooler, yes but its smaller, yes but wait for windows 10 hotfix which will release full power...etc.

Infraction reversed, because of this:

http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504270&postcount=26
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504394&postcount=31
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504903&postcount=48
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37504923&postcount=50

Don't even waste your time reporting any more posts here until you start setting a better example in your own posting, hypocrites.

-- stahlhart

Way to set a proper standard for behavior, moderators. /s

Two wrongs don't make a right.

 

[2is]

I need some infractions reversed too please

 

[stahlhart]

Way to set a proper standard for behavior, moderators. /s

Two wrongs don't make a right.

You know what? You're right, I stand corrected. I'll see to it that, based on your complaint, the moderation here is doled out impartially and fairly.
-- stahlhart

 

[krumme]

Its not fair you give him recognition