Originally posted by: Kharohz
I know the 7600GT would own in everywhere else. But I believe that the Voodoo3 would kill it in diablo2 in terms of general smoothness. (which oddly will have nothing to do with FPS)
I just remember my Voodoo3 on my p2 266 being smoother than it is now with a Athlon 64 +3200 with a 850xt.
(The reason I mention 7600GT, is a friend who has that video card is convinced that the 7600GT would own it no matter what)
edit: In otherwords, someone tell me I am wrong, because I am really tempted to call my brother up and have him send me a Voodoo3
Originally posted by: mwmorph
It's like sticking Stephen Hawking in the Olympic's 100m and thinking he'll runs faster than everyone else.
I don't understand the Voodoo nostalgia, I mean, there's no good reason to stick a Voodoo3 into a modern PC unless you have to since there are so much better alternatives available.
You wouldn't pair up a Pentium II at 266mhz or build a system with just 64mb of ram to play Diablo II better than the AMD64 would you? It just does not make sense.
It's like sticking Stephen Hawking in the Olympic's 100m and thinking he'll runs faster than everyone else.
Originally posted by: Kharohz
I don't understand the Voodoo nostalgia, I mean, there's no good reason to stick a Voodoo3 into a modern PC unless you have to since there are so much better alternatives available.
You wouldn't pair up a Pentium II at 266mhz or build a system with just 64mb of ram to play Diablo II better than the AMD64 would you? It just does not make sense.
It's like sticking Stephen Hawking in the Olympic's 100m and thinking he'll runs faster than everyone else.
IF (And this is why I am asking here) the Voodoo3 performs better in Glide (which nothing else can use) in Diablo2. Then yes, if my current game of choice is Diablo2, I would temporary stick a Voodoo3 in my system to play it. (Being how I have access to one)
It is a matter of compatibility, not a matter of full blown speed. Which is a non-issue due to the processor in use.
Diablo 2 Direct3d support is considered crappy at best, so the best option is a Glide wrapper. I guess the real question boils down to this:
Which is superior, Glide or Fake-Glide?
As for the Stephen Hawkings analogy:
Its more like:
There is a race track, the track has different lanes, Stephen Hawking's lane has a perfect non-slip surface, with nothing that would slow his progress. The other lanes are bumpy hazardous curve ridden nightmares, but at least the drivers have rocket boosters to get them to the end faster.
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
voodoo > * in diablo2/glide mode.
D2 was written with glide in mind.
i used to run a voodoo5 5500 PCI and X850XT PCI-E at the same time.
in diablo 2, the X850 pulled about 70-80fps. the voodo5 pulled 125. graphics API ftw for the voodoo
Originally posted by: Kharohz
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
voodoo > * in diablo2/glide mode.
D2 was written with glide in mind.
i used to run a voodoo5 5500 PCI and X850XT PCI-E at the same time.
in diablo 2, the X850 pulled about 70-80fps. the voodo5 pulled 125. graphics API ftw for the voodoo
At least I have one person who tells me what I want to hear
And?BFG10K, AA isn't an option in the D2 menu and can only be activated via the nV control panel.
I can assure you that 32xS does a lot to smooth those lego blocks.Resolution is also capped at 800 x 600, so I don't know if it would help that much.
When D2 is in 3D mode it's sort of semi-isometric.AF is used to smooth textures viewed at sharp angles, and D2 is two-dimensional... no angles to speak of.