sushiwarrior
Senior member
- Mar 17, 2010
- 738
- 0
- 71
You continue to read between the lines and draw you own conclusions since I addressed neither of these questions in any of my posts.
This is the closest reference to these questions but it was a rebuttal to a claim and not a direct analysis of either of these questions. Feel free to continue to draw your own conclusions that actually have no relevance to any of my posts :whiste:
I didn't even realize it was possible to be this.... dense.
AMDs bread and butter is low-end and mid-range sales, not halo products. AMD only has the revenue to support either their bread and butter, or to risk it for the biscuit and go for high-end and maybe sell 1/10 as many APUs at a better margin (at absolute best).
You seem to not understand a few things.
1. AMD can design a high-end APU easily, they can design a lot of stuff.
2. AMD cannot SELL a high-end APU in addition to their current line of APUs.
3. Given than AMD cannot do both, they must choose which to focus on.
4. High-end APUs are a prospective, low-volume market, more applicable to perhaps a start-up or a niche company. AMD is neither.
Conclusion: Why don't you go on kickstarter, ask people for a few million dollars (maybe a few hundred to be safe), and then go out and try to design your own niche high-end APU. Because that's where it belongs, not in the hands of AMD.
I hope you never become the CEO to any company ever.