Lonbjerg
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 4,419
- 0
- 0
That s non sense.
IB was designed for 22nm , otherwise it wouldnt be more
power efficient than SB.
There s no way that a CPU could be half optimized for a given
process since it would not even reach the previous node perfs.
Layout has been deeply reworked to be put in adequation
with trigate fets geometry and electrical caracteristics.
No, you make no sense now.
The layout of transistors are very much ditaced by process node.
Look at GTX480 vs GTX580.
The same goes for CPU's.
Sandy Brigde was designed for 32nm, Ivy brigde was a tweak of Sandy Brigde to 22nm....were as Haswell alswys have been slated for 22nm.
And if you think Intel just now knew the properties of their 22nm Trigate...you are funny.
What the next "excuse" for AMD falling behind?..this "You don't know if Intel's 22nm Haswell will work very good"...it's bori..ZZZzzzZZZZzzzZZZZ...