heymrdj
Diamond Member
- May 28, 2007
- 3,999
- 63
- 91
Yes, yes it is.
Hatchback. If not, what's the difference between a hatchback and a wagon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatchback
Hatchback. If not, what's the difference between a hatchback and a wagon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatchback
I'm of the opinion that all wagons are hatchbacks, but not all hatchbacks are wagons. A wagon typically has a little more "junk in the trunk" where the back end hangs out over the back wheels more. A hatch typically is much more cut back after the C-Pillar.
How so? There are many older wagons that didn't exactly have a hatch, but a side-opening door in the back. These wagons though were typically of a much larger size than today's "wagons".
Hatchback. If not, what's the difference between a hatchback and a wagon?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatchback
I think a lot of people in the 20-40 age range remember their parents having one of these when they were kids:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/87-90_Chevrolet_Caprice_wagon.jpg
Which was about the most uncool thing you could be seen in. And so they have carried over that anti-wagon bias into their adult hood. Wagon? No way...those are lame.
Plus America in general has some aversion to the word "hatch". It's got a general association with the words "cheap" and "econo car".
Then what is it?
dictionary.net
Merriam-Webster
answers.com
Long body not found
Storage space behind seat not found
extended roof not found
Not a wagon. Good try though.
My definition: 4 doors = wagon. 2 doors = hatch. There is grey area where the rear wheel is so close to the back as is the case with the 4 door golfs and minis.
<== loves his legacy wagon. Is sad he couldn't get it in turbo form + manual. Can compromise on the manual, but can't even get a turbo'ed legacy wagon from Subaru anymore.
I drive a sedan with fold-down rear seats for hauling long items, and pets sit on the back seat on trips to the vet. I have a truck for picking up large items.
I think wagons / hatchbacks are useful for their added versatility, but I personally can't stand their looks (I can't stand SUVs or crossovers either). For anything of "average" size, my Fusion does just fine. When I need to pick up something large, like the bed frame and mattress I bought two weekends ago, I have an F-150 at my disposal. Even with a wagon, we'd never have been able to fit the bed and mattress safely.
Wagons are like El Caminos, awful looking. It's like someone saying:
Customer: "Ummm, I want a car but I also want a pickup truck."
Salesman: "Hey, I have the perfect vehicle for you! It is a car-truck. It's called an El Camino."
Customer: "That is AWESOME!"
And yes, I'd consider those Subarus wagons. They are like mini-wagons, and they look goofy as hell.
Wagons are like El Caminos, awful looking.
instead of looking at it in terms of age, I see it more along political lines.
My sample set is rather small, being limited to the people I personally know why drive these two vehicle types, but what I've witnessed is:
Wagon=liberal
SUV=conservative
instead of looking at it in terms of age, I see it more along political lines.
My sample set is rather small, being limited to the people I personally know why drive these two vehicle types, but what I've witnessed is:
Wagon=liberal
SUV=conservative