It's amusing you guys are calling the Repubs nazis when the Democrats have always been the party of the nazis. Projecting?
Holy shit, do you actually believe that? That's been disproven by science. Also, do you actually believe that you're getting enough trace minerals and nutrients from tap water to matter? Also, why would doctors recommend using distilled for baby's formula if it "pulled nutrients" from their bodies?
I've been drinking it for over a year and have more energy since my kidneys don't have to filter the sandstone and iron that comes from my town's wellwater.
LOL ignorant facts when they don't fit you.
What facts am I ignoring?
You seem sot be forgetting history conveniently. Either that or you are arguing for the big switch myth. A summary, not mine.
"Just the idea that the two parties could suddenly totally switch should be suspect on the face of it to any critical thinker as anyone who really considered the idea would realize how implausible that actually is. Can you imagine the two parties magically switching today?
The party switch is basically three myths wrapped into one false narrative.
The first myth is that Republicans had to appeal to racists to become competitive in the south, when the reality is that Republicans began to be competitive in the south in 1928 when Republican Herbert Hoover won over 47% of the Southern popular vote against Democrat Al Smith. In 1952, Republican president Dwight D. Eisenhower, the man who warned us of the military-industrial-complex, won the southern states of Tennessee, Florida and Virginia. In 1956, Eisenhower also won Louisiana, Kentucky and West Virginia. That was AFTER he supported the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. The Board of Education that desegregated public schools (that Democrats violently opposed) and AFTER he sent the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock Central High School to enforce integration, again, something that was violently opposed by Democrats.
The second myth is that Democrats who were angry with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 switched parties. This makes absolutely no sense as, despite the fact that we had a Democratic president in JFK, only 61% of congressional Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act vs 80% of congressional Republicans. Additionally there was a Democratic filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that lasted for 83 days. So why would the parties switch, when it was Republicans who overwhelmingly supported the Civil Rights Act while it was Democrats who predominantly opposed it?
The third myth is that Republicans have dominated the south since the implementation of the Southern Strategy. In fact Nixon lost the Deep South in 1968, while Democrat Jimmy Carter swept the region in 1976, 12 years after the Civil Rights Act. And in 1992, Bill Clinton dominated the south taking Georgia, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia.
The truth is that Republicans did not hold a majority of Southern congressional seats until 1994, 30 years after the Civil Rights Act.
In fact as the south has become more Republican it has become less racist. How does the party switch theory explain that?
The party switch myth is meant to free Democrats from their unquestionably and singularly racist history. It is only the complete takeover of academia by the left that has allowed this myth to persist and that allows the Democratic Party to escape so many unpleasant historical facts.
Such as the fact that FDR, widely considered the greatest Democratic President in American history, was the only US president to put people in internment camps based solely on their ethnicity.
Such as the fact that the 1956 Southern Manifesto was signed by 99 congressional Democrats and only two Republicans. The Southern Manifesto declared the overwhelmingly Democratic opposition to desegregation set forth in Brown v. The Board of Education.
It was, in fact, Democrat George Wallace who stood in the schoolhouse door to prevent the integration of the University of Alabama.
In further fact, Al Gore's father, a Democratic senator, voted against the Civil Rights Act and as recently as 2010 the Democratic leader in the senate, Robert Byrd, was the former leader of his local KKK chapter.
Lastly, the Republican Party was literally founded as an anti-slavery movement and the KKK was founded by Democrats.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/republican-party-founded
"By February 1854, anti-slavery Whigs had begun meeting in the upper midwestern states to discuss the formation of a new party. One such meeting, in Wisconsin on March 20, 1854, is generally remembered as the founding meeting of the Republican Party.
https://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan
“Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders and voters. Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s.”
Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, the first KKK Grand Dragon, was a honored speaker at the 1868 Democratic National Convention. The slogan for the 1868 Democratic National Convention was, "This is a White Man's Country, Let White Men Rule".
Democratic president Woodrow Wilson resegregated federal government agencies (that had been desegregated by Republicans), organized private screenings of a KKK glorifying movie in the White House (the first movie ever shown in the White House, in fact) and said "segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen."
The bottom line: the Republican Party was the party of anti-slavery, reconstruction and desegregation while the Democratic Party was the party of slavery, Jim Crow laws and the KKK. No magical “party switch” will ever erase that reality."
It's amusing you guys are calling the Repubs nazis when the Democrats have always been the party of the nazis. Projecting?
You seem sot be forgetting history conveniently. Either that or you are arguing for the big switch myth. A summary, not mine.
"Just the idea that the two parties could suddenly totally switch should be suspect on the face of it to any critical thinker as anyone who really considered the idea would realize how implausible that actually is. Can you imagine the two parties magically switching today?
The party switch is basically three myths wrapped into one false narrative.
The first myth is that Republicans had to appeal to racists to become competitive in the south, when the reality is that Republicans began to be competitive in the south in 1928 when Republican Herbert Hoover won over 47% of the Southern popular vote against Democrat Al Smith. In 1952, Republican president Dwight D. Eisenhower, the man who warned us of the military-industrial-complex, won the southern states of Tennessee, Florida and Virginia. In 1956, Eisenhower also won Louisiana, Kentucky and West Virginia. That was AFTER he supported the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. The Board of Education that desegregated public schools (that Democrats violently opposed) and AFTER he sent the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock Central High School to enforce integration, again, something that was violently opposed by Democrats.
The second myth is that Democrats who were angry with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 switched parties. This makes absolutely no sense as, despite the fact that we had a Democratic president in JFK, only 61% of congressional Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act vs 80% of congressional Republicans. Additionally there was a Democratic filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that lasted for 83 days. So why would the parties switch, when it was Republicans who overwhelmingly supported the Civil Rights Act while it was Democrats who predominantly opposed it?
The third myth is that Republicans have dominated the south since the implementation of the Southern Strategy. In fact Nixon lost the Deep South in 1968, while Democrat Jimmy Carter swept the region in 1976, 12 years after the Civil Rights Act. And in 1992, Bill Clinton dominated the south taking Georgia, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia.
The truth is that Republicans did not hold a majority of Southern congressional seats until 1994, 30 years after the Civil Rights Act.
In fact as the south has become more Republican it has become less racist. How does the party switch theory explain that?
The party switch myth is meant to free Democrats from their unquestionably and singularly racist history. It is only the complete takeover of academia by the left that has allowed this myth to persist and that allows the Democratic Party to escape so many unpleasant historical facts.
Such as the fact that FDR, widely considered the greatest Democratic President in American history, was the only US president to put people in internment camps based solely on their ethnicity.
Such as the fact that the 1956 Southern Manifesto was signed by 99 congressional Democrats and only two Republicans. The Southern Manifesto declared the overwhelmingly Democratic opposition to desegregation set forth in Brown v. The Board of Education.
It was, in fact, Democrat George Wallace who stood in the schoolhouse door to prevent the integration of the University of Alabama.
In further fact, Al Gore's father, a Democratic senator, voted against the Civil Rights Act and as recently as 2010 the Democratic leader in the senate, Robert Byrd, was the former leader of his local KKK chapter.
Lastly, the Republican Party was literally founded as an anti-slavery movement and the KKK was founded by Democrats.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/republican-party-founded
"By February 1854, anti-slavery Whigs had begun meeting in the upper midwestern states to discuss the formation of a new party. One such meeting, in Wisconsin on March 20, 1854, is generally remembered as the founding meeting of the Republican Party.
https://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan
“Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders and voters. Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s.”
Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, the first KKK Grand Dragon, was a honored speaker at the 1868 Democratic National Convention. The slogan for the 1868 Democratic National Convention was, "This is a White Man's Country, Let White Men Rule".
Democratic president Woodrow Wilson resegregated federal government agencies (that had been desegregated by Republicans), organized private screenings of a KKK glorifying movie in the White House (the first movie ever shown in the White House, in fact) and said "segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen."
The bottom line: the Republican Party was the party of anti-slavery, reconstruction and desegregation while the Democratic Party was the party of slavery, Jim Crow laws and the KKK. No magical “party switch” will ever erase that reality."
That history is now ANCIENT HISTORY. We're more occupied with what is now a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER to our country.
This is an argument that I can't shake the feeling I've seen before.
Oh yeah...
It not a mystery at all that you left this out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixiecrat
And here is proof the parties switched sides on civil rights.
Name one single civil rights bill with broad GOP support since 1970.
No "Southern Strategy?"
ROFL!!!
Look at all these sources, direct quotes ADMITTING IT and evidence to support a GIANT wiki page on it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
In an interview included in a 1970 New York Times article, Nixon's political strategist Kevin Phillips stated his analysis based on studies of ethnic voting:
"From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don't need any more than that... but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats."
Whoops.
Nixon's advisers recognized that they could not appeal directly to voters on issues of white supremacy or racism. White House Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman noted that Nixon "emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognized this while not appearing to". With the aid of Harry Dent and South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, who had switched to the Republican Party in 1964, Nixon ran his 1968 campaign on states' rights and "law and order". Liberal Northern Democrats accused Nixon of pandering to Southern whites, especially with regard to his "states' rights" and "law and order" positions, which were widely understood by black leaders to symbolize Southern resistance to civil rights.Double whoops.
Not only is the Southern Strategy real, the people who created. implemented it and perfected it into a virtual GOP sweep of the south it have fucking admitted it. It is hilarious how you did not mention Nixon but stopped just short of him, and his racist corrupt cabinet who were, by all accounts, the perfectors and implementers of the Southern Strategy for the GOP.
But seriously, it is fucking funny how you skipped right the fuck over the very president and admin that created the new racist GOP.
It's amusing you guys are calling the Repubs nazis when the Democrats have always been the party of the nazis. Projecting?
You are so horrible. You dashed a whole world of misconceptions for him.It not a mystery at all that you left this out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixiecrat
And here is proof the parties switched sides on civil rights.
Name one single civil rights bill with broad GOP support since 1970.
No "Southern Strategy?"
ROFL!!!
Look at all these sources, direct quotes ADMITTING IT and evidence to support a GIANT wiki page on it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
In an interview included in a 1970 New York Times article, Nixon's political strategist Kevin Phillips stated his analysis based on studies of ethnic voting:
"From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don't need any more than that... but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats."
Whoops.
Nixon's advisers recognized that they could not appeal directly to voters on issues of white supremacy or racism. White House Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman noted that Nixon "emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognized this while not appearing to". With the aid of Harry Dent and South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, who had switched to the Republican Party in 1964, Nixon ran his 1968 campaign on states' rights and "law and order". Liberal Northern Democrats accused Nixon of pandering to Southern whites, especially with regard to his "states' rights" and "law and order" positions, which were widely understood by black leaders to symbolize Southern resistance to civil rights.Double whoops.
Not only is the Southern Strategy real, the people who created. implemented it and perfected it into a virtual GOP sweep of the south it have fucking admitted it. It is hilarious how you did not mention Nixon but stopped just short of him, and his racist corrupt cabinet who were, by all accounts, the perfectors and implementers of the Southern Strategy for the GOP.
But seriously, it is fucking funny how you skipped right the fuck over the very president and admin that created the new racist GOP.
Can you show any examples of democrats and nazis working together? We can show many examples of the gop aligning with nazis.
The problem with Nazis like his is that they don't want to stop being Nazis, they just want to not be called out for being Nazis. We should always call out Nazis when we see them. Nazis should never know peace in America.It not a mystery at all that you left this out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixiecrat
And here is proof the parties switched sides on civil rights.
Name one single civil rights bill with broad GOP support since 1970.
No "Southern Strategy?"
ROFL!!!
Look at all these sources, direct quotes ADMITTING IT and evidence to support a GIANT wiki page on it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
In an interview included in a 1970 New York Times article, Nixon's political strategist Kevin Phillips stated his analysis based on studies of ethnic voting:
"From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don't need any more than that... but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats."
Whoops.
Nixon's advisers recognized that they could not appeal directly to voters on issues of white supremacy or racism. White House Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman noted that Nixon "emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognized this while not appearing to". With the aid of Harry Dent and South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, who had switched to the Republican Party in 1964, Nixon ran his 1968 campaign on states' rights and "law and order". Liberal Northern Democrats accused Nixon of pandering to Southern whites, especially with regard to his "states' rights" and "law and order" positions, which were widely understood by black leaders to symbolize Southern resistance to civil rights.Double whoops.
Not only is the Southern Strategy real, the people who created. implemented it and perfected it into a virtual GOP sweep of the south it have fucking admitted it. It is hilarious how you did not mention Nixon but stopped just short of him, and his racist corrupt cabinet who were, by all accounts, the perfectors and implementers of the Southern Strategy for the GOP.
But seriously, it is fucking funny how you skipped right the fuck over the very president and admin that created the new racist GOP.
In this, like in everything else, you are wrong.Holy shit, do you actually believe that? That's been disproven by science. Also, do you actually believe that you're getting enough trace minerals and nutrients from tap water to matter? Also, why would doctors recommend using distilled for baby's formula if it "pulled nutrients" from their bodies?
I've been drinking it for over a year and have more energy since my kidneys don't have to filter the sandstone and iron that comes from my town's wellwater.
Aside from its flat taste, distilled water doesn’t provide you with minerals like calcium and magnesium that you get from tap water. Because it doesn’t contain its own minerals, distilled water has a tendency to pull them from whatever it touches to maintain a balance. So when you drink distilled water, it may pull small amounts of minerals from your body, including from your teeth.
Go look up on YT how many people who have gone distilled have more energy. Also I work out every other day, obviously I'm drinking protein shakes during and after which studies show provides more energy during. Enjoy paying and lugging your bottled water (aka the bane of the environment to create and dispose of).
If you're really that worried about minerals, go to amazon and buy mineral drops. Yet most people will do this for the taste, not b/c of theoretical electrolyte loss. I consume at least a gallon a day and never been healthier, more vibrant, and clear thinking.
Jesus Christ you are dumber than a fucking hammer store.
Jesus Christ you are dumber than a fucking hammer store.
Go look up on YT how many people who have gone distilled have more energy. Also I work out every other day, obviously I'm drinking protein shakes during and after which studies show provides more energy during. Enjoy paying and lugging your bottled water (aka the bane of the environment to create and dispose of).
If you're really that worried about minerals, go to amazon and buy mineral drops. Yet most people will do this for the taste, not b/c of theoretical electrolyte loss. I consume at least a gallon a day and never been healthier, more vibrant, and clear thinking.
????????????It's amusing you guys are calling the Repubs nazis when the Democrats have always been the party of the nazis. Projecting?
Lol, I defend nazi's and white power? Keep thinking that bro. And if you mean b/c I like Trump, then you're even more delusional than I thought.
What is the valid complaint that blacks have? According to FBI statistics, blacks commit more than half of violent crimes while comprising only 15% of our population. Am I supposed to feel sorry for them? When I listen to the music they listen to (drugs gats hoes bitches), am I supposed to feel sorry for them? They are doing it to themselves. Sorry you've been duped by their victim card.
Also, the fact that you believe in equality of outcomes tells me everything I need to know. We know how that worked out the last time that experiment came to fruition (Look up the russian purges). Oh, but I'm so oppressed! Says the idiots in this country who are most likely making enough to be in the world's top 1% (> $30,000).
Want to help the oppressed, Amused? Go to Africa. In fact, I bet I've donated much more to Africa (i.e Real oppressed people with nothing) in my sponsors of missionaries there, as well as money for churches to be built there.
What the fuck have you done to help real oppressed people? But keep spouting about BLM, the joke is most likely on you bro if you really think that blacks in this country are "oppressed" financially when GLOBAL stats show otherwise - that blacks have it good here compared to other crappy countries with real dictators and real warlords. Really the only thing I'll give you is that racial profiling does exist, but so fucking what? They don't act a fool and they'll be fine. And now the whining that they don't want cops to have bodycams b/c it's not allowing them to lie about their police interactions and pull the victim card? Are you fucking kidding me? That's for an entire other thread though.
Bu,but she's a silly librul woman.Hey just because roid boy gets his health advice from you-tube....
What in the actual fuck is that anyway? He might as well do whatever stupid shit Gwyneth Paltrow has come up with this week.