trenchfoot
Lifer
- Aug 5, 2000
- 14,685
- 7,186
- 136
I find the two tone concrete bottom with blue steel upper to be quite fashionable. Notice the rounded upper lip prevents a grappling hook from latching onto it to deter rappelling. Now if we could only paint a smiley face or something on it then we'd be all set.
Really though we do need them along populated areas to prevent illegal crossings. I lived along the border for over 6 years and witnessed illegal crossings first hand. They would just cut holes in the chain-link fence in El Paso at will and on any given day you could watch people coming and going unimpeded.
The welcome mat is out from all of those businesses that like the work ethic of those folks and really like the nice profits they get from paying slave labor wages to them. The fence is symbolic of the conflict between the folks who make a nice profit from the foreigners that cross the border illegally and the people that feel threatened by these uninvited guests.
Somewhere somehow it's been deemed acceptable that breaking the law by hiring uninvited guests from the other side of the border is A-OK and should be allowed because it's good for business, but having the foreigners crossing the border illegally to fill the demand for their services is a big no-no when both sides should be prosecuted equally or, not at all. Such is not the case.
In between these law breaking employers and the exploited employees who have no papers are the rest of us citizens who get more or less affected by this illegally conspired occupational relationship depending on how close we are to the border and how much our wages (up or down) and lifestyles get affected by that relationship.
Seeing as if those businesses are reaping the profits from this acceptable yet not acceptable relationship, I'd very much like for these businesses to pay for Trump's Great Wall of America (including Trump himself) seeing as if they're the ones who are the primary beneficiaries of such labor, with the federal gov't being complicit via their refusal to go after those immigration law breaking businesses with the same zest and zeal as they do with hunting down these undocumented "job stealers".
More boots and eyes on the ground seems to be the most cost effective way to go, but building a wall somehow seems to buy a lot more votes than having more border security forces in place would.
Seeing as if you're right on the border and are directly affected by the aforementioned conflict of interests between businesses who like illegal labor and those folks who don't want these border hoppers breaking the law, I'd very much like know your thoughts on the matter. However I wouldn't want to jack this thread, so I'll keep this mind and when the occasion arises, let's discuss.