WaPo: Roy Moore underage sex allegations. 12/4 update: Trump endorses. Jones wins

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jan 25, 2011
16,668
8,832
146
Right wing troll and general piece of human excrement Jack Posobiec doxxed one of the victims posting her picture and where she worked. He's since had to take his Twitter account private.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,851
36,798
136
One would argue that 1960s and 2010s are different universes....

So many things are looked at differently back then.

Look at Maryland vs Rusk - This was in 1978-1979. Maybe you have forgotten how much the social climate has changed in a relatively short period of time?

https://law.justia.com/cases/maryland/court-of-special-appeals/1979/1249-september-term-1978-0.html

Color me skeptical that non-consensual sexual relations and sex with minors will enjoy the same degree of cultural meh-ness that adultery does now.

In fact it would seem that society is taking those things on quite the opposite track lately given the careers that have been laid waste.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
No. I am saying that in the past with MLK we separated his words from his actions because he was very much more than just an adulterer.

Not anything to do with HOW we know, but more what we know.

Repeat after me. Adultery is not child molestation.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,851
36,798
136
The National Republican Senate Committee has pulled out of it's joint fundraising agreement with Moore. Given that the Senate Leadership Fund has already denounced him I think this leaves only the RNC itself (for now) as the lone money raiser working with him.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
Repeat after me. Adultery is not child molestation.

You aren't understanding what I am trying to say.

The culture around adultery in the 60s vs the conduct of a 32 year old man trying to have sex with 16 year olds in the 70s might basically be a wash. In one instance he took an 18 year old on a date and gave her wine (legal drinking age is 19).

The only difference is the culture has eased in one direction (adultery) and tightened in another (underage sex), so you are applying todays cultural values to actions of a person 40 years ago.

Even though it hasn't. Let's pretend that the stigma around adultery has actually gotten worse in this country. Would you want to be the person traipsing around this forum denouncing MLK every chance you got?

No. they aren't the same, no Moore is not MLK, and no I'm not defending his actions. I am just trying to add some nuance to the discussion.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,851
36,798
136
Most recent poll of the race now has Jones and Moore tied, included questions about scandal. Moore would probably fall to a write in campaign for Strange.

Moore and Democrat Doug Jones are tied at 46% in the survey, which was conducted Thursday by Opinion Savvy and commissioned by Decision Desk HQ in the aftermath of a bombshell Washington Post report in which the accuser, now 53, went on record with her story.

The results also suggested that a write-in campaign by another Republican could tip the seat to Democrats — a prospect that once seemed far-fetched in deep-red Alabama. A three-way race — with Moore, Jones, and interim Sen. Luther Strange as a write-in candidate — would favor Jones with roughly 44% of the vote, followed by Moore at 41%, and Strange at 12%.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/henrygomez...ns-against-roy?utm_term=.wm4WWDyPq#.xvWXX47Pe
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
The National Republican Senate Committee has pulled out of it's joint fundraising agreement with Moore. Given that the Senate Leadership Fund has already denounced him I think this leaves only the RNC itself (for now) as the lone money raiser working with him.
Don't forget about Spencer, I'm sure Bannon will make sure he gets funding.
 

SmCaudata

Senior member
Oct 8, 2006
969
1,532
136
You aren't understanding what I am trying to say.

The culture around adultery in the 60s vs the conduct of a 32 year old man trying to have sex with 16 year olds in the 70s might basically be a wash. In one instance he took an 18 year old on a date and gave her wine (legal drinking age is 19).

The only difference is the culture has eased in one direction (adultery) and tightened in another (underage sex), so you are applying todays cultural values to actions of a person 40 years ago.
.

This is because as time has gone on, we've realized that brains aren't fully developed until the mid 20's for most people. We've also learned more about humans in general in the last few decades and I think that it is safe to say a grown man trying to have sex with a pre-pubescent female is a mental deficiency, not simply a "bad choice" that has now become more significant due to changes in culture. The actual reasons for it being wrong from a biological/humanistic perspective was just as true then as now. An early 20's man and a late teens woman are probably fairly close developmentally and I'd be willing to entertain your nuance to the discussion. A 32-year old man and 14 year old woman is sexual abuse of a child, period.

I mean, we could say that owning slaves now is only really bad because of the cultural values today. I think we can all agree that slavery was always amoral and wrong, (some) people just didn't want to admit it then. The same is true here.
 

Stokely

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,150
2,854
136
Right wing troll and general piece of human excrement Jack Posobiec doxxed one of the victims posting her picture and where she worked. He's since had to take his Twitter account private.

I don't truly believe in vigilante justice...but damn I wouldn't be too sad if someone gave this prick a severe beating with a tire iron. He could literally get this woman killed.

Edit: If true, of course

He's saying it was heavy.com.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
You aren't understanding what I am trying to say.

The culture around adultery in the 60s vs the conduct of a 32 year old man trying to have sex with 16 year olds in the 70s might basically be a wash. In one instance he took an 18 year old on a date and gave her wine (legal drinking age is 19).

The only difference is the culture has eased in one direction (adultery) and tightened in another (underage sex), so you are applying todays cultural values to actions of a person 40 years ago.

Even though it hasn't. Let's pretend that the stigma around adultery has actually gotten worse in this country. Would you want to be the person traipsing around this forum denouncing MLK every chance you got?

No. they aren't the same, no Moore is not MLK, and no I'm not defending his actions. I am just trying to add some nuance to the discussion.

I don't think that 14 was acceptable then, well I know it wasn't. Roman Polanski can vouch for that I think.
I understand you are attempting to look at things from the perspective of the time but 'jail bait" was a thing way back then. He knew or should have known that it was wrong by the standards of the time, he just didn't care.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,351
8,440
126
Most recent poll of the race now has Jones and Moore tied, included questions about scandal. Moore would probably fall to a write in campaign for Strange.
from what I've heard, strange can't win a write-in due to Alabama's "sore loser" law. I guess those votes wouldn't count.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,668
8,832
146
from what I've heard, strange can't win a write-in due to Alabama's "sore loser" law. I guess those votes wouldn't count.
He can't be represented by another party on the ballot I believe. I do think a write in would still be valid.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...uther-strange-can-do-write-in/article/2640226

Alabama has a “sore loser" law, but Merril said that law only applies to names printed on the ballot, meaning appointed Sen. Luther Strange, who Moore defeated in a September primary, can seek election through that route.

“Sen. Strange could still be a write-in candidate, but he cannot be a candidate whose name appears printed on the ballot, that would be a violation of the sore loser law,” Merril said. A spokesman for Strange's campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment on his plans.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,851
36,798
136
from what I've heard, strange can't win a write-in due to Alabama's "sore loser" law. I guess those votes wouldn't count.

From what I've read the AL "sore loser" law allows somebody who lost a primary from the same party to mount a write in challenge and have those votes be certified. You can't lose an R primary then try to do a write in as a Libertarian or an Independent. It's weird but appears to be the law.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
47,851
36,798
136
The political calculation for the GOP is fraught to say the least. Moore wins he's a monumental political liability and unreliable Senate vote, he loses to Jones without the GOP helping sink him they aided and abetted his candidacy after knowing better so another huge PR fail, they torpedo his candidacy with Strange and lose the seat further enraging the Bannon wing of voters.
 

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
This is because as time has gone on, we've realized that brains aren't fully developed until the mid 20's for most people. We've also learned more about humans in general in the last few decades and I think that it is safe to say a grown man trying to have sex with a pre-pubescent female is a mental deficiency, not simply a "bad choice" that has now become more significant due to changes in culture. The actual reasons for it being wrong from a biological/humanistic perspective was just as true then as now. An early 20's man and a late teens woman are probably fairly close developmentally and I'd be willing to entertain your nuance to the discussion. A 32-year old man and 14 year old woman is sexual abuse of a child, period.

I mean, we could say that owning slaves now is only really bad because of the cultural values today. I think we can all agree that slavery was always amoral and wrong, (some) people just didn't want to admit it then. The same is true here.

I'm sure Moore isn't even worth any of this discussion so I doubt it is worth the bother.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,668
8,832
146
I don't truly believe in vigilante justice...but damn I wouldn't be too sad if someone gave this prick a severe beating with a tire iron. He could literally get this woman killed.

Edit: If true, of course

He's saying it was heavy.com.
Yeah he had her name, the business name AND the city. The article said motorcycle dealership. beyond that he sent it out to his 220K followers with no attribution. That's on him.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,083
30,015
146
I'm sure Moore isn't even worth any of this discussion so I doubt it is worth the bother.

The entire state of Alabama still disagrees, and especially the GOP disagrees...well, up until yesterday, anyway. Remember when this guy was the 10 Commandments darling of the national GOP, "doing for justice" what our beloved founders explicitly prohibited him from doing, via constitutional law?
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
The entire state of Alabama still disagrees, and especially the GOP disagrees...well, up until yesterday, anyway. Remember when this guy was the 10 Commandments darling of the national GOP, "doing for justice" what our beloved founders explicitly prohibited him from doing, via constitutional law?

What level of good can someone do to offset a particular perversion. As I said before, Hoover tried with adultery and MLK, it failed, Chappelle tried to defend Cosby as a rapist and a saver, and it failed against Cosby.

I guess each case is a specific value judgment.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,150
10,672
136
What level of good can someone do to offset a particular perversion. As I said before, Hoover tried with adultery and MLK, it failed, Chappelle tried to defend Cosby as a rapist and a saver, and it failed against Cosby.

I guess each case is a specific value judgment.
Since someone brought up slavery. We still respect the funding fathers even though they were slave owners. And some like Jefferson even had sexual relations with his slaves.

Not that Moore deserves any respect for any reason. For other people it should be possible to hate the sin and love the dinner, so to speak.
 

Stokely

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,150
2,854
136
If there's a plus side of Moore getting elected (provided he stays in, and does get elected) -- it's that (hopefully) every single GOP politician that *didn't* come out against him gets asked repeatedly and constantly about it. Granted, a new shiny comes along so often that it might not last long. Also a bonus if it causes friction within the party. That lady above was pissed.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
Since someone brought up slavery. We still respect the funding fathers even though they were slave owners. And some like Jefferson even had sexual relations with his slaves.

Not that Moore deserves any respect for any reason. For other people it should be possible to hate the sin and love the dinner, so to speak.

Yes.

Separate the art from the artist is another saying I have heard.

Although the utility gained from letting a predator continue to make art probably isn't as defensible as somebody more in the public service. Hence why Cosby doesn't get any slack but Thomas Jefferson does.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,856
7,380
136
It's fairly obvious that if Moore wins a seat, for as long as he's sitting, he'll be a constant painful and damaging reminder of how "The Party of Family Values and Personal Responsibility" can have as their leader and colleague the antithesis of such ideals with a President like Trump and a Senator like Moore in their midst, both setting an example for how low in the social and religious order of things they are willing stoop and tolerate in order to win the class warfare they are waging against the working class and the poor.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |