Warcrimes

[Vadatajs]

Threatening Belgium is not a bright way to address the accusations

discuss






Enjoy your "freedom waffles" maggots.

 

[aznparty]

Somehow I doubt anything will come of this. If they get the trial to actually go through or they do something to Franks then I bet Belgium will be next on Bush's list if it isn't already.

 

[JellyBaby]

We've already banned Belgium waffles. NEXT ISSUE!

 

[HappyPuppy]

I'll bet Franks is shaking in his boots. Let's see, how many troops does he command, half a million maybe? Do ya think those troops could take care of Belgium?

 

[Rastus]

Originally posted by: JellyBaby
We've already banned Belgium waffles. NEXT ISSUE!

Freedom waffles rock!

 

[LunarRay]

Originally posted by: Vadatajs
Threats are not a bright way to address this issue

discuss

A test case is often persued not to prove malice but, rather, to see what the law as written is interpreted to mean.
You might as well start at the top so that in the future the minor players will not find credible challenge.

A judicial opinion on the matter would probably exhonorate the evil general but, in the opinion the grounds will serve well to prosecute the exceptions left unchallenged.

The people in the East of Belgium... Liege, Bastone etc.. are pro American to the extent their neighbors to the east and south are anti.. The French speaking Belg is that way... to my experience any how..

 

[AnImuS]

let them try and bring him in that ought to be funny

 

[Phuz]

"I think either the US State Department has nothing to hide, in which case it's very important for them to have an independent inquiry - and why can't it be a Belgian magistrate - or they have something to hide and that's why they are threatening Belgium,"

That about sums it up.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: Phuz

"I think either the US State Department has nothing to hide, in which case it's very important for them to have an independent inquiry - and why can't it be a Belgian magistrate - or they have something to hide and that's why they are threatening Belgium,"

That about sums it up.

I think the Belgium lawyer is over the top and should be disbarred. We can throw around baseless accusations as well.

 

[snidy1]

Originally posted by: AnImuS
let them try and bring him in that ought to be funny

I agree

 

[BarneyFife]

Well it's a good publicity stunt for the lawyer.

 

[Phuz]

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: Phuz

"I think either the US State Department has nothing to hide, in which case it's very important for them to have an independent inquiry - and why can't it be a Belgian magistrate - or they have something to hide and that's why they are threatening Belgium,"

That about sums it up.

I think the Belgium lawyer is over the top and should be disbarred. We can throw around baseless accusations as well.

I suggest you re-read the statement. What are you arguing about?

"I think either the US State Department has nothing to hide, in which case it's very important for them to have an independent inquiry"

And the problem with this is...?
And the problem with it being a Belgian magistrate is...?

The last statement I'm not surprised with at all.. the U.S. imposes trade embargos and other restrictions on almost any country it disagrees with. (even Canada)

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: Phuz

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: Phuz

"I think either the US State Department has nothing to hide, in which case it's very important for them to have an independent inquiry - and why can't it be a Belgian magistrate - or they have something to hide and that's why they are threatening Belgium,"

That about sums it up.

I think the Belgium lawyer is over the top and should be disbarred. We can throw around baseless accusations as well.

I suggest you re-read the statement. What are you arguing about?

"I think either the US State Department has nothing to hide, in which case it's very important for them to have an independent inquiry"

And the problem with this is...?
And the problem with it being a Belgian magistrate is...?

Why should the US go to Belgium courts? We neither appointed nor elected these judges. If there was wrong doing I have faith in our military courts.

The last statement I'm not surprised with at all.. the U.S. imposes trade embargos and other restrictions on almost any country it disagrees with. (even Canada)

The last statement I'm not surprised with at all.. the Canada imposes trade embargos and other restrictions on almost any country it disagrees with. (even US)

 

[Alistar7]

What court was it that declared Bill Clinton a war criminal for his actions in Bosnia?

A UN approved, US led effort, of course, we are the only ones to ever get permission, hell, we are the only ones who ever even ask first.