Wasted a high end graphics card

Pandamonia

Senior member
Jun 13, 2013
433
49
91
I have 780 Lightning SLI and there are no games which are even using one 780.

Most games have no SLI support.

Dayz
Titanfall
Elderscrolls online
Rust

It SUCKS!

Im so bored right now. Waste of money tbh
 

KaRLiToS

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2010
1,918
11
81
I am also in the same boat. Spent thousands of dollars and end up not being happy with what I have. Disapointed of the lack of support for high-end gear.

I have issues and instead of playing on a single monitor I prefer not to play at all and let the rig takes dust.
 

T_Yamamoto

Lifer
Jul 6, 2011
15,007
795
126
I am also in the same boat. Spent thousands of dollars and end up not being happy with what I have. Disapointed of the lack of support for high-end gear.

I have issues and instead of playing on a single monitor I prefer not to play at all and let the rig takes dust.

First world problems
 

desprado

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2013
1,645
0
0
Yup this year is has got a lot boring.Spend a lot of money on Pc no but no game to play right now.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Heh. Low end GPUs in both major consoles and 20nm delays will at least make a 290X/780 last for a good long time.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
we dont need 20nm.

We need games.

forget 20nm until they make some damn games worth playing.

I agree, although they are kind of 2 separate issues. I am really bored with PC games right now as well. Seems like everything is either on online shooter or pay to win microtransaction MMO, and I dont play MMOs in any case.

The only game I am really looking forward to in the near future is the new Dragon Age one, and even then, after DA2 and ME3, I will be very cautious about Bioware/EA games.
 

lavaheadache

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2005
6,893
14
81
First world problems

That phrase bugs me for so many reasons. Likely if you are even reading this very thread you are of "first world". Also, a lot of these threads are created by people who likely prioritize things differently.

3x5= 15
15x4= 60
60x6 = 360
2x360= 720

10x2.5 = 25
25x4= 100
100x6= 600
600x2= 1200

I just created a nearly $1000 budget every 6 months for pc upgrades out of 2 everday things for many people. Coffee and cigarettes. While my simple list doesn't apply to everyone the theory does.
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
PC DIY is a hobby like many other things. Want to spend a ton of money? Have fun. Don't want too? That's valid as well.

Rant time about those complaining about too little versus too much GPU power:

What I truly don't understand is people who moan that they can't run games at ultra settings, but refuse to budge on tweaking. It's like it's ultra or nothing. Which is quite frankly, stupid, because you can lower the visual preset by 1-2 notches and the game will not look different. Crysis 3 at very high versus high looks no different. Yet if you take the stupid setting of ultra with 4X MSAA versus "high" with FXAA you gain like 30-40 fps.

I mean I have a pretty sick GPU setup, 780 SLI. But sitting here tweaking on one GPU which I ran for some time, I literally tried to make games look bad. Now if you go on low presets, they could look bad. But at ultra versus high and very high? They look virtually identical with my 20/20 vision. So I'm trying to figure out why people complain about not being able to run ultra settings. Hello? Obvious answer: Tweak and don't run ultra settings. The game will not look different at ultra 4X MSAA versus high or very high. PROMISE. I've tried this numerous times. These games have overkill settings that don't even affect image quality. But for some reason, some people cannot tweak. Can't tweak won't tweak. But instead complain about ultra 8X MSAA framerates.

Or the other side of the argument. I can't use all of my GPU horsepower. Hello? Better monitors. More monitors. Why anyone would get SLI or CF for 1080p blows my mind. I sure wouldn't do it. And yeah, the occasional game may not run at 60 fps ultra settings. See above paragraph for answer to that problem.

Anyway, that's just my thought on anyone complaining about SLI or Crossfire. If you want to use that horsepower, get surround. Or get better high resolution monitors. Or get rid of one of your GPUs and use your common sense if you can't run a game at 120 fps on ultra settings. Use your common sense to lower some settings. I promise the game won't look different if you tweak 1-2 settings, but it will run much better.

In the end. It's all about what brings you pleasure for your hobby. If you want to spend more money on your PC for more GPUs and more monitors, it's fun to do that. I've certainly obliged to that many times over the years. You could easily waste thousands of dollars on truly stupid things as lava mentioned. What I don't understand is complaining about "too much versus too little" with this hobby of ours. Hello? If it's too much or too little GPU horsepower, adjust accordingly. Change your settings. Tweak. Get rid of a GPU. Use common sense. Just look at it as a hobby and do what you can to increase enjoyment, instead of complaining about it. IMO!
 
Last edited:

Fastx

Senior member
Dec 18, 2008
780
0
0
Blackend how long ago did you go to SLI 780?
(I knew you had a EVGA 780)

PS?
30" 1600p right?
If you ever put up a YT vid BF4 SP with OSD data pm me or post it I be interested to see it at 1600P.
 
Last edited:

KingFatty

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2010
3,034
1
81
I just want to sympathize, because this is a tangible financial hit to the owner of high-end video card etc. setup.

I mean that the software companies should have a complete product, and the drivers should run it. Each day that passes where you can't use your hardware because of some software hold up is just another day of depreciation.

If you could somehow know ahead of time when a company's game would be compatible with a given hardware setup, then you could hold off and wait to buy your GPUs when they would actually be supported. But as it is, you have to trust that software companies will be on the ball and not drag their feet. So you have faith, invest a lot in your setup, and then it's a big let down as your stuff goes unused. Then when you actually get to use it, the hardware value has dropped enough to just be very frustrating. It's especially galling because software companies and hardware companies get income from first adopters who are the big spenders. You piss them off, then it's a trickle-down effect. You'd think that the hardware companies would put a little more emphasis on getting software right so people want to keep buying the high-end cards.
 

Sable

Golden Member
Jan 7, 2006
1,127
99
91
however, game situation means it's not even worth selling my butt to nvidia for a couple of titan blacks. Not looking in anybodies direction here...
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,832
38
91
I have 780 Lightning SLI and there are no games which are even using one 780.

Most games have no SLI support.

Dayz
Titanfall
Elderscrolls online
Rust

It SUCKS!

Im so bored right now. Waste of money tbh

Yeah SLI has always been more troublesome than worth. Often you'll find that only a few games out of an entire library actually work well using both and that always seems to be older, well patched titles. Lack of support is expected though as it's such a tiny fragment of the entire gaming market that it's understandable why dev's don't want to bug test even more just to support it.

Take comfort in knowing you may be glad to have it for Witcher 3 or even Watchdogs though. Going high end has always worked out better for me in the long run but it never takes long until a new AAA title forces you back down to 30'ish Frame rates. I got pretty tired of all the inconsistencies in PC gaming myself.
 
Last edited:

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,751
3,068
121
I've been wondering myself why I see so many still big on SLI when a lot of games do not support it.
 

Fastx

Senior member
Dec 18, 2008
780
0
0
Rant time about those complaining about too little versus too much GPU power:

What I truly don't understand is people who moan that they can't run games at ultra settings, but refuse to budge on tweaking. It's like it's ultra or nothing. Which is quite frankly, stupid, because you can lower the visual preset by 1-2 notches and the game will not look different. Crysis 3 at very high versus high looks no different. Yet if you take the stupid setting of ultra with 4X MSAA versus "high" with FXAA you gain like 30-40 fps.

Everyone has a difference of opinion for what ever reason, for me part of it is I want my computer to run games at ultra/highest settings, that is part of the fun/hobby for me to do it. I don't mind just turning down 4x MSAA to 2x MSAA but thats it I don't want to start turning down other settings. I want ultra settings with 2 MSAA or 4 MSAA its just part of the hobby/fun for me to do that.

I know the above might sound crazy to you and others but that is just my opinion.
 
Last edited:

janii

Member
Nov 1, 2013
52
0
0
sli/crossfire is never a good choice and will never be a good choice.
Unless the games/drivers are suddenly able to manually fully utilize sli/crossfire

Or you want to run 4k and highest settings. But below that resolution a single good one is more than enough
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,832
38
91
I've been wondering myself why I see so many still big on SLI when a lot of games do not support it.

Usually it's for hobby, folding stuff like that. Nvidia markets it for gaming though.
SLI always reminds me of the Voodoo 2 days, I may be wrong but seemed like it worked with more games than it does today. Maybe NV should go back to 3dfx's Scan Line Interleaving, maybe it would work better or not need native support?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |