Overall takeaway: The Fury X is erratically-performing garbage (as objective people and Nvidia-lovers alike have known for a year and a half now) likely due to either its weak front-end and/or VRAM (and at other times due to CPU overhead). Contrary to the former rallying call of a few particular defenders, it is not aging better than the real 980 Ti (ie. aftermarket). It's even experiencing a bit of a Kepler effect relative to the 480 where its geometry throughput is stressed.
Meanwhile, 3 GBs of VRAM is really meh these days (4 GBs is next) and I really can't find any justification for the 3 GB 1060. It's just not right. $200+ cards should never be VRAM-limited so soon after release, imo.
Meanwhile actual AMD competitors to GM200/GP104 are still no-shows, let alone GP102. And GP104 masquerading as the flagship GPU, in combination with its high prices, is really getting boring. After all the 16/14nm hype, the 980 Ti provided a bigger performance jump from the 980 while still on 28nm than the 1080 did over the 980 Ti. And Nvidia gets rewarded for it with record profits while AMD are clearly outclassed and no longer a threat, so why would they even bother giving us impressive gains for reasonable prices again?
2016 sucked for high-performance microprocessors (including CPUs).