[ Wccf Tech ] GTX TITAN-X To Be Priced at $1350 MSRP

alcoholbob · Jan 21, 2015

GM200 will be slower than both the Titan Z and R9 295X2 so it's overpriced considering it will be slower than the previous year's flagships

imaheadcase · Jan 21, 2015

You people are ridiculous. Complain about anything. If it was $500 you would say it ran 5c more than amd card so not worth it.

2is · Jan 21, 2015

Except we have an actual Titan owner in here also complaining. What's ridiculous is that you actually believe what you're saying. I assure you, if we were provided with a $500 Titan, you'd see a whole lot more cheers than frowns.

Techhog · Jan 21, 2015

I can't believe you're defending this.

I can't believe you're defending this.

Yes, I typed that twice. I'm that dumbfounded. Did you defend the Titan Z too? You at least did a decent job of living up to your username.

WittyRemark · Jan 21, 2015

Not sure if trolling ..

or just stupid.

5150Joker · Jan 21, 2015

Yeah no. Got burned the first time when they released the 780 so that ain't happening again. Will wait on Pascal or 980Ti

AnandThenMan · Jan 21, 2015

No one would say that, if it was $500 it would be highly praised.

96Firebird · Jan 21, 2015

I can't believe you guys believe more WCCFTech nonsense...

amenx · Jan 22, 2015

I know someone here will take 4 .

crisium · Jan 22, 2015

And that's what I love. If you have the income and passion, then enjoy top performance. As long as you realize that, much like the Titan, AMD will beat it for less than half the price in the same calendar year, followed by Nvidia releasing a more reasonably priced 980Ti card that's just as fast. If you are ok with that and are fine with upgrading again later this year, then I hope we see some people with 4. I always support the true enthusiasts who get the best of the best (although, with the current state of SLI vs superior Crossfire, will the extra FPS actually mean its smoother?)

Pwndenburg · Jan 22, 2015

Well, technically the fourth time, since I got my buddy a 980. Just getting the facts straight. Like I said, I'm "disappointed" with NVIDIA regarding the whole "Titan" thing. But, I honestly still prefer their ecosystem and plan on gaming at either 1080p or the very similar 16:10 on my dell. So, given the point in the market I happened to get the itch to upgrade again being now, we have the 980 as the clear winner providing with me with around ~20% upgrade in performance.

Really, I'm certainly not in love with NVIDIA by any means, I had the lightning 5870 and would recommend AMD do someone without reservation. My primary thing isn't about price/$ or any of the other usual metrics cited, it's about 1080p performance at the time of upgrade. Usually NVIDIA just turns out to have had that metric when I have upgraded.

As always, when the 2016/2017 round comes around whoever can treat me right in terms of max performance at the resolution I happen to be using at the time will win. Obviously, I forgot to include that I will not go over $699 or something within reason to get there. If I were a betting man, I'm betting that AMD may just be in my future circa late 2016/early 2017.

Black Octagon · Jan 22, 2015

NO.

My current card cost 500 beans.

It has kept me happy ever since.

No complaints, about temps or anything else.

You lose.

DooKey · Jan 22, 2015

This

Dribble · Jan 22, 2015

Just economics - they aren't going to make many of these so they sell them for as high a price as they can. Seems someones worked out they'll sell them all at $1350 each. If someone's going to buy them fine by me - that profit will get plowed back in to making normal cards better for the other 99.99% of us.

Now if the price of more normal cards keeps going up, that bothers me much more.

SirPauly · Jan 22, 2015

Not really! It may be natural to at least complain some what, at least constructively, if the MSRP is now $1,350.

therealnickdanger · Jan 22, 2015

If it was $500, we would still complain because the 980Ti would be $300 and have better performance! LOL

NVIDIA is doing it to itself.

wand3r3r · Jan 22, 2015

SperglordActual · Jan 22, 2015

Considering that AMD will be dropping the 380x (or whatever its called) within a month or two of this, I will just wait and see, I want supreme performance for witcher 3, but im not paying over 1k for a card when direct competition is so close.

xthetenth · Jan 22, 2015

I'm almost tempted to budget for one of these so can get one...

Adaptive sync monitor and two 380s.

I'm pretty sure that's more than the contents of my box cost, and I didn't exactly skimp.

$350 is a pretty big jump. Here's hoping I'm not complaining about single cards cracking 2k in a few years.

Headfoot · Jan 22, 2015

Because $500 = $1,350

xthetenth · Jan 22, 2015

Funnily the same performance at $500 and at $1350 offer a radically different price/performance ratio. At $500 I'd probably consider one. At $1350 I'll crack snide jokes.

Is there any appeal to such a card at that price after the 780Ti for any reason other than casual compute?

exar333 · Jan 22, 2015

Will be getting 3-4 of these for sure!

Then re-selling for $2000/each. :sneaky:

The original Titans held a good $500-600 premium for the first month or two. These will be the same...

Omar F1 · Jan 22, 2015

I'd better throw my money over street rather than buying into this crap.
Wow Nvidia!

Ajay · Jan 22, 2015

Well, it might make a nice entry level compute card, but for gaming - it's simply e-peen.

Arachnotronic · Jan 22, 2015

Not sure if serious...but if true, will participate in the "F5 olympics" and try to nab as many of these suckers as I can at launch.

[ Wccf Tech ] GTX TITAN-X To Be Priced at $1350 MSRP

Diamond Member

Diamond Member

Diamond Member

Platinum Member

Member

Diamond Member

Diamond Member

Diamond Member

Diamond Member

Platinum Member

Member

Golden Member

Golden Member

Platinum Member

Diamond Member

Senior member

Diamond Member

Member

Golden Member

Diamond Member

Golden Member

Diamond Member

Senior member

Lifer

Lifer