Well until Tahiti, they always had the ROPs coupled to the Memory channels. Are the Radeon core count correct at 2816 for the 290X ??
44CUs of 64 SPs each makes 2816
Well until Tahiti, they always had the ROPs coupled to the Memory channels. Are the Radeon core count correct at 2816 for the 290X ??
44CUs of 64 SPs each makes 2816
Well until Tahiti, they always had the ROPs coupled to the Memory channels. Are the Radeon core count correct at 2816 for the 290X ??
One part of these specs is wrong. Let's see if you guys figure out which one
2816 is correct.
Holy crap these prices are out of control.
Holy crap these prices are out of control.
Seriously. I am disappoint if the R290X launches at $699. $599 is more reasonable for the rumored performance and $499 woud be even better.
yeah 12 with one disabled makes sense. Probably had to do it just for power consumption so we will get the real fully functioning chip once they move to smaller process.Interesting, could this mean that there might be a disabled CU in the there somewhere?
Making a 12CU, 48 ROPS and 3072 ALU part a 290X Ultra a future possibility:sneaky:
R9 290X at Newegg for $730.00. I remember the good old days when I could afford a GPU (or stomach buying one).
The massive duopoly collusion continues..........
Anyone that has followed prior GPU launches knows that pre-launch prices, especially based on currency conversion, are usually not based in reality. Sites had the 7970 at 700$+ in the weeks before launch. Whatever. AMD is stupid but not stupid enough to price it that high, I'd say 600$ is probably the price. Not sure if the BF4 bundle edition costs more, though, that is definitely possible.