No, but I really don't understand why AMD spends all their guerilla marketing on reddit folks when AT forums have old geezers like you to do their bidding far more vociferously.
Uh, do you listen to yourself? Why would they waste their money when apparently everyone here who doesn't agree with you is willing to do AMD's bidding for free?
But yes, I'm sure AMD has just forced all these poor devs to simply not check a box, as you put it. That's the only possible explanation for the dozens (oh..., not even handful?) of games that implemented FSR but not also DLSS. No other possible explanation for this, whatsoever. None at all. Just simply cannot be anything but the truly dastardly Lisa Su, I bet she's twirling her mustache right now!
Its not like we haven't seen a rash of problematic PC game performance issues. Its interesting that you're in here acting like this can only be explained by seemingly some heinous anti-competitive behavior by AMD, but massive performance drop when you have 8GB or less of VRAM (which I'm guessing is larger than 40% of the market), not a peep from you whatsoever? Guess that's totally fine with you? Welp, guess that means there can be only one explanation. Jensen personally prevented you from clicking that thread box!
Read what I wrote one more time, slowly. I clearly mentioned performance. Callisto Protocol, Forspoken, Jedi Survivor, TLOU Part I. All AMD sponsored, all plagued with performance issues.
Yeah, because we haven't seen performance issues on any other games.
So for evidence we have a list of 21 AAA games:
8 are Nvida bundled and 13 are AMD bundled.
Of the 8 Nvidia bundled games, 8 were released with dlss support and 5 with fsr support, an additional 2 had fsr added 3-6mo after release.
Of the 13 AMD bundles 9 were released with fsr support and 3 with dlss support, an additional 2 had fsr support added 2-3 months post release.
It is clearly possible to be AMD bundled and release with dlss support, without at least some additional evidence how does one come up with AMD is paying people to block features?
That whole article is one speculation after another about AMD/Nvidia relations with developers without even attempting to contact a developer to hear from them.
If I look at and consider just the chart as my source of evidence my conclusions would be that AMD is putting in a superior effort in working with developers. They have more of the bundle partnerships as well working with developers well past release dates to improve them.
Its nice to see that this forum is every bit as much of a clownshow as its ever been, what with people like the OP around to keep it that way.
I think articles like this has been WCCFTech's bread and butter for like decades now? I remember people pointing out this type of behavior years and years back. I'm honestly baffled how this nonsense spread to so many other outlets so quickly, since I don't recall anyone treating WCCFTech as legitimate enough to run with their claims, let alone when its so lacking of anything tangible to actually go with as this article was. I don't think it can be explained by the outrage cycle, as generally there needs to be something tangible there to support it blowing up like this. This sure comes off orchestrated. Guess we'll see, but I know Linus has been trashing Nvidia quite a lot, and have a hunch this is an attempt at damage control/reframing the narrative (something that sure seems to happen a lot when there's criticism of Nvidia...).