Maybe they should. Naturally you would back that, just like you back AMD doing it?
I don't know where you got the idea that I'd back AMD blocking DLSS or vice-versa.
This entire thread, I've been trying to make a few points:
1) We should not assume that AMD intentionally blocks DLSS just from what we've read from that WCCFTech article. For that hypothesis/speculation to be fact, there needs to be beyond a reasonable doubt, ideally from a first hand source like game developers, that it happens. There's multiple hypotheses that have varying degrees of validity that could explain what we're seeing from the consumer side of things, but to treat the one with the highest degree of validity as fact is not how things work because people assign validity in a highly subjective manner. This isn't me trying to defend AMD; it's me defending journalistic integrity and how the scientific method works. One does not look at something from only a limited number of angles and then conclude that one's observations must be true, especially when one knows there are other angles to look from; one must rule out all other possibilities for the ones that remain to be true.
For example, say you and I were disagreeing on the exact length of an object and you claimed that by putting your hand next to it, you could infer it's length because you know the size of your hand. If we had a ruler next to us, why not use it instead of ignoring it and going by what you claim is the size of your hand?
2) Gamers love to mudsling and jump to conclusions when they don't get what they want. Look, I get it. DLSS does better than FSR at upscaling, and there's a LOT of Nvidia RTX GPU owners out there. I do not deny that. These gamers paid more money for an Nvidia card, so they have an expectation that they'll be able to use DLSS, but we have to understand that an expectation is not a guarantee. Do you agree? For AMD to "block" Nvidia, there must be an attempt for Nvidia to put DLSS in the game. If Nvidia never had any intention of getting DLSS in the game, why should it be treated it as a block? Have we ruled out the possibility that Nvidia was never interested in sponsoring Starfield? If not and people are assuming AMD did something intentionally malicious to simply piss DLSS users off, then that hatred is misplaced in my opinion. Why do people blame AMD for sponsoring games, which for the record both companies have been doing for ages, when A) we haven't confirmed that Nvidia tried to get sponsorship first, B) expectations of DLSS in every AAA title aren't guaranteed by Nvidia, and C) developers making poorly optimized games that can mitigated by good upscaling (read: DLSS) cannot conclusively be determined at the moment to be AMD's fault.
To directly answer your question, no. I don't want either company to exclude one technology over the other. But what I want isn't how the real world works and there's no point in getting pissed off when some video games don't support certain technologies because I have the maturity to know that it says nowhere on the GPU box that DLSS/FSR is guaranteed on the games I want to play. I have no horse in this race between AMD or Nvidia (for the record, I sold all my AMD shares earlier this year). The only thing I ask is for people to be rational and not jump to conclusions because it fits their buying/GPU vendor preferences.
Edit: Honestly, I laugh at gamers who are pissed off at this. No offense to people who treat gaming as a serious hobby, but it is literally just a hobby. I am at a point in my life where I don't let self-imposed high expectations influence my mood, because all this grievance to me seems to be coming primarily from those who are Nvidia GPU owners getting all uppity. People with AMD GPUs don't even get to use DLSS to begin with, so why would they be pissed. If I were an Nvidia GPU owner, I personally wouldn't give a crap that Starfield doesn't have DLSS and the reasoning for that is simple. If it's an unmitigated mess, then I simply don't buy the game. I'm not over here praying that the game comes with DLSS so that I can now finally enjoy the video game. I have other hobbies and more important things in life to keep me occupied. Life is too short to be setting myself up for failure with high self-imposed expectations and then lashing out at corporations when they don't meet said expectations, especially for something so frivolous as video gaming.