Weapons of Mass destruction found.

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: josphII
due to the serious nature of this find in iraq i think this topic should get a sticky

Serious? If they found vast stockpiles it would be serious.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: josphII
due to the serious nature of this find in iraq i think this topic should get a sticky

Why? It's not even on the main page of pro-bush.com...er...foxnews.com.

Why? Because it's a non-issue, at this point. Should a stockpile be found, then it would be an issue.

 

[josphII]

oh this is VERY serious! i think all of you that have kids should make them write one page summaries describeing how serious this is and how this find affects america and our troops.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: josphII
oh this is VERY serious! i think all of you that have kids should make them write one page summaries describeing how serious this is and how this find affects america and our troops.

I think it would be better for them to write an essay about how serious it is to have the Dub and his nefarious network of Neocons running (ruining) our foriegn policy

 

[josphII]

"I know the left like every square inch of my naked body, so I know how they're going to say, 'There weren't any WMD in Iraq. We caused them to be brought there. This is all Bush's fault!' You wait. It's what's going to end up being said." - Rush Limbaugh

Mr. Rushbo, its being said in this very thread!

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: josphII

"I know the left like every square inch of my naked body, so I know how they're going to say, 'There weren't any WMD in Iraq. We caused them to be brought there. This is all Bush's fault!' You wait. It's what's going to end up being said." - Rush Limbaugh

Mr. Rushbo, its being said in this very thread!

Hey they are just blowing off steam, like having at a College Fraternatiy

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: josphII

"I know the left like every square inch of my naked body, so I know how they're going to say, 'There weren't any WMD in Iraq. We caused them to be brought there. This is all Bush's fault!' You wait. It's what's going to end up being said." - Rush Limbaugh

Mr. Rushbo, its being said in this very thread!

Truth hurts, eh?

And thanks for the visual of Rush's fat-ass, naked. :disgust:

 

[drewshin]

hee hee there has been one WEAPON of mass destruction found (possibly two?) from a period about twenty years ago, unmarked and was barely able to do injure two people standing close to it. and this was the "grave" danger that iraq posed to us. talk about the greatest overstatement in history.

 

[josphII]

Iraqi Nerve Gas, WMD Find Blows Away Pundits

excellent article

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: josphII
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/5/17/170427.shtml

excellent article

The words "excellent" and "newsmax" are wholly mutually exclusive.

Stop reading tabloids and look for something that actually at least resembles news.

BTW, FOX News has nothing about the shell on its main page anymore. Guess it's a non-story, as it really is, now.


BTW, that "writer" needs to work on his English skills:

the binary weapons [sic] design originated inside the former Soviet Union

However, it is clear, that much like cockroaches - when your [sic] find one it is an indication of many more

U.S. satellite's [sic] detected large convoys

 

[MegaWorks]

I like this thread

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: josphII
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/5/17/170427.shtml

excellent article

The words "excellent" and "newsmax" are wholly mutually exclusive.

Stop reading tabloids and look for something that actually at least resembles news.

BTW, FOX News has nothing about the shell on its main page anymore. Guess it's a non-story, as it really is, now.

:roll: It is not a "non-story" despite the left's attempts to make it a "non-story". We've not gotten through the list of excuses for this chemical weapon. Now maybe people will let their rational side take over and admit that Sarin is WMDs and that this is a serious issue. If there was one -there are more...

But anyway i'm sure the left will sweep this under the rug push it off into a corner somewhere like they have with the UN oil for fools scandal, the UN sex abuse scandal, and the World Bank corruption.

CkG

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: josphII
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/5/17/170427.shtml

excellent article

The words "excellent" and "newsmax" are wholly mutually exclusive.

Stop reading tabloids and look for something that actually at least resembles news.

BTW, FOX News has nothing about the shell on its main page anymore. Guess it's a non-story, as it really is, now.

:roll: It is not a "non-story" despite the left's attempts to make it a "non-story". We've not gotten through the list of excuses for this chemical weapon. Now maybe people will let their rational side take over and admit that Sarin is WMDs and that this is a serious issue. If there was one -there are more...

But anyway i'm sure the left will sweep this under the rug push it off into a corner somewhere like they have with the UN oil for fools scandal, the UN sex abuse scandal, and the World Bank corruption.

CkG

There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

Yes, I know that excuse has already been raised here. And like I said - it is still a serious issue. If there is 1 then there are most likely more. 1 or 1000 of these shells is serious. Ofcourse the argument now goes from "No WMDs found" to "not enough WMDs found"

CkG

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
:roll: It is not a "non-story" despite the left's attempts to make it a "non-story". We've not gotten through the list of excuses for this chemical weapon. Now maybe people will let their rational side take over and admit that Sarin is WMDs and that this is a serious issue. If there was one -there are more...

But anyway i'm sure the left will sweep this under the rug push it off into a corner somewhere like they have with the UN oil for fools scandal, the UN sex abuse scandal, and the World Bank corruption.

CkG

There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

And, for some reason, that very simple fact is the cause of a huge rift between political viewpoints.

Amazing how the Bush-fans cannot understand the fact that Saddam used to have them but no longer does.

 

[DealMonkey]

Will someone please answer my question?

Is this why we went to war? An unknown quantity of Sarin from who-knows-where? Some inert mustard gas components in an old artillary shell? Is this the evidence of the massive threat Saddam posed before we went to war?

Come on! Answer the damn question!

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

Yes, I know that excuse has already been raised here. And like I said - it is still a serious issue. If there is 1 then there are most likely more. 1 or 1000 of these shells is serious. Ofcourse the argument now goes from "No WMDs found" to "not enough WMDs found"

CkG

Excuse?!?! Excuse for what, going to war?

I will grant you that it is a serious issue..along the lines that everything that is happening in Iraq these days is a serious issue.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

Yes, I know that excuse has already been raised here. And like I said - it is still a serious issue. If there is 1 then there are most likely more. 1 or 1000 of these shells is serious. Ofcourse the argument now goes from "No WMDs found" to "not enough WMDs found"

CkG

That's a big ASSumption.

I mean, come on, CkG! Bush and Rumsfeld knew Saddam had stockpiles and Rumsfeld even knew where they were.


Well....we're waiting!

 

[heartsurgeon]

Dear CAD.....

save you breath..

the Dems/Libs are hysterical. Nothing will mollify them. Mention "Bush" and they start frothing and twitching....heck, the best thing they can come up with now is getting McCain to be Kerry's (a highly decorated Vietnam Veteran) Veep!! Pathetic!

Just remember:

they don't care what we find.."no amount will satisfy me..

 

[leeboy]

[

they don't care what we find.."no amount will satisfy me..

As opposed to your any amount will satisfy me and that it was OK to invade Iraq and have people like leeboys son never return home to find one shell on the side of the road? Thanks, got it.

 

[josphII]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
:roll: It is not a "non-story" despite the left's attempts to make it a "non-story". We've not gotten through the list of excuses for this chemical weapon. Now maybe people will let their rational side take over and admit that Sarin is WMDs and that this is a serious issue. If there was one -there are more...

But anyway i'm sure the left will sweep this under the rug push it off into a corner somewhere like they have with the UN oil for fools scandal, the UN sex abuse scandal, and the World Bank corruption.

CkG

There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

And, for some reason, that very simple fact is the cause of a huge rift between political viewpoints.

Amazing how the Bush-fans cannot understand the fact that Saddam used to have them but no longer does.

you're totally wrong here. these weapons that he used to have he supposedly destroyed. or have you not read the numerous accounts of how certain weapons, more specificlly wmd's, were unaccounted for!

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: josphII

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
:roll: It is not a "non-story" despite the left's attempts to make it a "non-story". We've not gotten through the list of excuses for this chemical weapon. Now maybe people will let their rational side take over and admit that Sarin is WMDs and that this is a serious issue. If there was one -there are more...

But anyway i'm sure the left will sweep this under the rug push it off into a corner somewhere like they have with the UN oil for fools scandal, the UN sex abuse scandal, and the World Bank corruption.

CkG

There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

And, for some reason, that very simple fact is the cause of a huge rift between political viewpoints.

Amazing how the Bush-fans cannot understand the fact that Saddam used to have them but no longer does.

you're totally wrong here. these weapons that he used to have he supposedly destroyed. or have you not read the numerous accounts of how certain weapons, more specificlly wmd's, were unaccounted for!

So he has them hidden where we can't find them? Damn if he would have hidden himself were he hid those WMDs he'd still be a free man LOL

 

[josphII]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: josphII

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
:roll: It is not a "non-story" despite the left's attempts to make it a "non-story". We've not gotten through the list of excuses for this chemical weapon. Now maybe people will let their rational side take over and admit that Sarin is WMDs and that this is a serious issue. If there was one -there are more...

But anyway i'm sure the left will sweep this under the rug push it off into a corner somewhere like they have with the UN oil for fools scandal, the UN sex abuse scandal, and the World Bank corruption.

CkG

There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

And, for some reason, that very simple fact is the cause of a huge rift between political viewpoints.

Amazing how the Bush-fans cannot understand the fact that Saddam used to have them but no longer does.

you're totally wrong here. these weapons that he used to have he supposedly destroyed. or have you not read the numerous accounts of how certain weapons, more specificlly wmd's, were unaccounted for!

So he has them hidden where we can't find them? Damn if he would have hidden himself were he hid those WMDs he'd still be a free man LOL

yes, although i wouldnt use the term 'free' if your hiding 24/7

 

[Klixxer]

In reality, there were speeches of vast stockpiles, mobile labs, large complexes used to create wmd's.

What has been found is one grenade that contained very little sarin gas and two bullets would have done a better job at injuring the soldiers that were exposed to it.

No stockpiles have been found, the mobile labs were not mobile labs, the large complexes did not contain even a trace of anything that resembles a WMD.

If you are going to use this as an excuse to invade a soverign nation, then you can continue to think that, just don't tell your shrink about your irrational fears, you might get locked up for life.

 

[EXman]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
There was never any doubt that Sadam had possesed WMDs, just that he didn't have mass quantities of them when we invaded his country.

Yes, I know that excuse has already been raised here. And like I said - it is still a serious issue. If there is 1 then there are most likely more. 1 or 1000 of these shells is serious. Ofcourse the argument now goes from "No WMDs found" to "not enough WMDs found"

CkG

That's a big ASSumption.

I mean, come on, CkG! Bush and Rumsfeld knew Saddam had stockpiles and Rumsfeld even knew where they were.


Well....we're waiting!

He was wrong? You even been wrong? You know I have! Whole world had bad intel on this cause Saddam knew he didn't even really need the WMD's as long as someone thought he had them the effect was the same. Terror.