Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: SmokeRngs
You do realize that everything you posted there validates and strengthens my argument don't you? It does not say that it no longer exists, it does say it's unaccounted for. Unaccounted for means it would still exist, just has not been found.
I must thank you for proving yourself wrong.
Wow. You prove yourself to be more ignorant with each new post! Amazing!
How in *the* hell does unaccounted for equate to existing? Hmmm?? Care to define the [ill]logic behind that thought process?
Guess you're having to burn that last brain cell trying to come up with another lame excuse.
It would be nice if you would refrain from insults, it only weakens your already weak arguments.
For your information, I do not spend all my time on here. I do work and I do raise my child. I just happen to post and read here when I have the chance.
For your information, the fact that the weapons were known to exist and now are unaccounted for would mean they still do exist until there is proof that they were destoyed. Unaccounted for just means lost. I'm sorry if that is too much for you to comprehend.
I would like to know your exact definition is regarding the unaccounted for weapons. What does it mean when something is unaccounted for, not just the WMDs, but anything. If you want an example, what does it mean when your car keys are unaccounted for? I know my answer, and you already do also, but myself, and many others, would like to know yours.