EXman
Lifer
- Jul 12, 2001
- 20,079
- 15
- 81
Originally posted by: conjur
Uh...I answered your question (I bolded your question to make it easier for you to see what you asked me. My response was the David Kay summarization.Originally posted by: EXman
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: EXman
Kilxx and Conjur since we are so dumb and failed all our classes can you enlighten us to where thes WMD's that were proven to be there that he already used went? Untill you bring that answer out your butt please excuse us while we laugh at you all.
Just answer the question what did Saddam do with his Real WMD's that have been proven that he had in the early 90's? Yes Proven. :roll:
You just really don't like to read, do you?
UNMOVIC worked throughout the 90s to destroy and dismantle the WMDs and the programs to create them. And, here are David Kay's own words:
http://in.news.yahoo.com/040406/137/2ceq7.html
By the time he resigned in January this year Kay said he had come to believe Iraq did not possess any large stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons when the United States invaded.
"I believe they became incapable after 1998 of really producing a coherent program," he said. "By December I clearly had told everyone that, but it's not true in July."
Vanity Fair reported Kay said he was ready to quit in December but Tenet pleaded with him to stay on because it would look bad if he left early.
Your buddies Bush/Powell/Rumsfeld have stated they not only knew Saddam had stockpiles of WMDs but they knew where these WMDs were. So, I ask you again, where are they?
Another BS post not answering the question just posing another one.
Answer mine:
Your buddies Bush/Powell/Rumsfeld have stated they not only knew Saddam had stockpiles of WMDs but they knew where these WMDs were. So, I ask you again, where are they?
you need to read the Whole thing!WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former U.S. weapons inspector David Kay said on Monday that he had not concluded by July 2003 that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction as reported by Vanity Fair magazine.
<snip>
<cut to the chase...the summary>
By the time he resigned in January this year Kay said he had come to believe Iraq did not possess any large stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons when the United States invaded.
"I believe they became incapable after 1998 of really producing a coherent program," he said. "By December I clearly had told everyone that, but it's not true in July."
Vanity Fair reported Kay said he was ready to quit in December but Tenet pleaded with him to stay on because it would look bad if he left early.
Kay even says they could be in Syria a hotbed on Terrorism or do you doubt that as well
just answer the question don't dodge it with half facts and partisan speculation
Kay had four hypotheses, yes, in July 2002. By Jan. 2003, though, he was down to one belief and it's highlighted above.
Just what are they teaching in schools these days that new students are coming out with such horrendous comprehension skills at reading??[/quote]
Read what you highlighted and tell me that me ALL WEAPONS WERE GONE?
So this guys OPINION is fact? Educated or not it is his opinion nothing more. c'mon you can do better I hope!
So what if they cannot make them in great quantities. where did the weapons in hand go to? duh ?