Weapons of Mass destruction found.

Page 27 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Klixxer

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2004
6,149
0
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
every site has been checked out
still waiting for a link to back this statement up.

Obviously you ARE search engine disabled, so i will provide a simple search for you.

10,001,000 links for your amusement

Here's a random link if you want a direct one, if you want more links, you got ten millions in the link above.

:roll::roll::roll:

Obviously, you are slow or limited in intellectual, or academic process. HS asked for a link
to back up your claim that every site has been checked out.

Now, do you have one or not?

No, i don't have 1, i have 10,010,000 to show that all 120 sites have been cleared without any findings, maybe you have a problem understanding the concept of a search too? If so i am sure there is some kind of book you AOLers can read, the guide to internet or whatever.

This is how it works, you go to www.google.com and type in the words kay +report and you find out that David kay went to all of the different sites and found NOTHING.

Sigh, i wish these AOL noobs would learn to search for themselves, but since you have not, you may use my link which is equivalent of a search with those words.

At least try to keep up, ok?
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
every site has been checked out
still waiting for a link to back this statement up.

Obviously you ARE search engine disabled, so i will provide a simple search for you.

10,001,000 links for your amusement

Here's a random link if you want a direct one, if you want more links, you got ten millions in the link above.

:roll::roll::roll:

Obviously, you are slow or limited in intellectual, or academic process. HS asked for a link
to back up your claim that every site has been checked out.

Now, do you have one or not?

No, i don't have 1, i have 10,010,000 to show that all 120 sites have been cleared without any findings, maybe you have a problem understanding the concept of a search too? If so i am sure there is some kind of book you AOLers can read, the guide to internet or whatever.

This is how it works, you go to www.google.com and type in the words kay +report and you find out that David kay went to all of the different sites and found NOTHING.

Sigh, i wish these AOL noobs would learn to search for themselves, but since you have not, you may use my link which is equivalent of a search with those words.





At least try to keep up, ok?


Thats what I thought. Since you can't link and quote something that directly supports your claim that "every sight has been checked out", then I will, and I assume HS will, just consider your posts nothing more than condescending lies..
 

Klixxer

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2004
6,149
0
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
every site has been checked out
still waiting for a link to back this statement up.

Obviously you ARE search engine disabled, so i will provide a simple search for you.

10,001,000 links for your amusement

Here's a random link if you want a direct one, if you want more links, you got ten millions in the link above.

:roll::roll::roll:

Obviously, you are slow or limited in intellectual, or academic process. HS asked for a link
to back up your claim that every site has been checked out.

Now, do you have one or not?

No, i don't have 1, i have 10,010,000 to show that all 120 sites have been cleared without any findings, maybe you have a problem understanding the concept of a search too? If so i am sure there is some kind of book you AOLers can read, the guide to internet or whatever.

This is how it works, you go to www.google.com and type in the words kay +report and you find out that David kay went to all of the different sites and found NOTHING.

Sigh, i wish these AOL noobs would learn to search for themselves, but since you have not, you may use my link which is equivalent of a search with those words.





At least try to keep up, ok?


Thats what I thought. Since you can't link and quote something that directly supports your claim that "every sight has been checked out", then I will, and I assume HS will, just consider your posts nothing more than condescending lies..

Check out any one of the links numbnuts, all 120 sites where checked, what's the matter? 10 million links not enough for you.

I have picked ONE link before and was then accused of being a partisan (how that moron figured that out considering i am not even American i will never know) so this time you get to click the links yourself, it's not like many of them haven't already been provided and read by the non blind crowd.

I have a problem realizing what it is you do not get.
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
you've answered a question i didn't ask....

i asked for links to support your contention that "every" site has been checked out.

120 sites isn't "every" site.

words have meaning.

i will assume that your inappropriate use of the word "every" was unintentional.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Klixxer



Thats what I thought. Since you can't link and quote something that directly supports your claim that "every sight has been checked out", then I will, and I assume HS will, just consider your posts nothing more than condescending lies..

Check out any one of the links numbnuts, all 120 sites where checked, what's the matter? 10 million links not enough for you.

I have picked ONE link before and was then accused of being a partisan (how that moron figured that out considering i am not even American i will never know) so this time you get to click the links yourself, it's not like many of them haven't already been provided and read by the non blind crowd.

I have a problem realizing what it is you do not get.[/quote]



Originally posted by: Klixxer
So they knew about +10000 liters of nerve gas, they knew where it was, they KNEW about the mobile labs (which has been PROVEN false, how can anyone know a falsehood without it being a lie?) they didn't only know that it was there, they knew where it was to, now that every site has been checked out and cleared without even so much as a trace you still claim they didn't lie?

It's like saying the sky is green and they absolutely know it, but you look up and see that it is blue, still they did not lie.

Did they lie, of course, even if vast stockpiles WERE found now, they still lied when they said that they KNEW what the mobile vans were for, if they lied or not isn't the question anymore, they did, get that into your thick skull Mr Kook.

Your last post proves you have a condescending attitude (moron,,,,,numbnuts,,,,,,non blind crowd,,,,,,,Mr Kook ).


Your colors are showing, now do you want to prove that you are not a liar about the part I bolded in the imported post. I would accept any link that shows all of the approximately 14,000 possible wmd
sites have been inspected..
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
hmmm....

Risk of radioactive "dirty bomb" growing

The IAEA says there are still 1000 radioactive sources unaccounted for in Iraq

i'm sure saddam would never have allowed any of those to find there way into the U.S., or Al Qaeda hands.

It is probably ten fold easier for the Muslim extremists now to get their hands on it than it was prior to invading and occupying Iraq!
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
hmmm....

Risk of radioactive "dirty bomb" growing

The IAEA says there are still 1000 radioactive sources unaccounted for in Iraq

i'm sure saddam would never have allowed any of those to find there way into the U.S., or Al Qaeda hands.

How many were unaccounted for before we invaded? Dubya keeps making the world more dangerous. He is Terrorist Supporter in Chief.

In 1996 there were just eight of these incidents but last year there were 51. Most cases are believed to have occurred in Russia and elsewhere in Europe. Smugglers target the radioactive materials used in factories, hospitals and research laboratories, which are not guarded as securely as those used by the nuclear industry.

Are we going to invade Russia too?

Do you ever get tired of getting pwned?
 

Klixxer

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2004
6,149
0
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: Klixxer



Thats what I thought. Since you can't link and quote something that directly supports your claim that "every sight has been checked out", then I will, and I assume HS will, just consider your posts nothing more than condescending lies..

Check out any one of the links numbnuts, all 120 sites where checked, what's the matter? 10 million links not enough for you.

I have picked ONE link before and was then accused of being a partisan (how that moron figured that out considering i am not even American i will never know) so this time you get to click the links yourself, it's not like many of them haven't already been provided and read by the non blind crowd.

I have a problem realizing what it is you do not get.



Originally posted by: Klixxer
So they knew about +10000 liters of nerve gas, they knew where it was, they KNEW about the mobile labs (which has been PROVEN false, how can anyone know a falsehood without it being a lie?) they didn't only know that it was there, they knew where it was to, now that every site has been checked out and cleared without even so much as a trace you still claim they didn't lie?

It's like saying the sky is green and they absolutely know it, but you look up and see that it is blue, still they did not lie.

Did they lie, of course, even if vast stockpiles WERE found now, they still lied when they said that they KNEW what the mobile vans were for, if they lied or not isn't the question anymore, they did, get that into your thick skull Mr Kook.

Your last post proves you have a condescending attitude (moron,,,,,numbnuts,,,,,,non blind crowd,,,,,,,Mr Kook ).


Your colors are showing, now do you want to prove that you are not a liar about the part I bolded in the imported post. I would accept any link that shows all of the approximately 14,000 possible wmd
sites have been inspected..[/quote]

Ok, so it changed from the sites Kay checked out? Of course it did, it changed during the UN inspections too where the US reluctantly shared info with the inspectors, the inspections were not effective though, they found NOTHING, just like Kay found nothing in the various places the US admin claimed to KNOW about, not even a trace. It is impossible to produce ABC weapons without leaving traces of them.

So search for Kay numbnuts, the US inspections are over "and the results are irrelevant, Saddam was a bad man".
 

Klixxer

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2004
6,149
0
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
hmmm....

Risk of radioactive "dirty bomb" growing

The IAEA says there are still 1000 radioactive sources unaccounted for in Iraq

i'm sure saddam would never have allowed any of those to find there way into the U.S., or Al Qaeda hands.

My ex grandparents live in a house in Finland that had to be sanitized because of radiation, damn, i knew it, terrorists, the lot of them.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Gotta love it.

Because of the chaos created by the US invasion of Iraq, all kinds of materials have disappeared thru looting and lack of civil authority. Which must, of course, be Saddam's fault, and justification for the invasion that created the chaos... allowed the looting...

Anybody else notice that the propaganda become more and more transparent as desperation sets in?
 

J Heartless Slick

Golden Member
Nov 11, 1999
1,330
0
0
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Gotta love it.

Because of the chaos created by the US invasion of Iraq, all kinds of materials have disappeared thru looting and lack of civil authority. Which must, of course, be Saddam's fault, and justification for the invasion that created the chaos... allowed the looting...

Anybody else notice that the propaganda become more and more transparent as desperation sets in?

I thought that the OP was a parody or a joke....
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |