Weapons of Mass destruction found.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

josphII

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
1,490
0
0
Even his own scientists (the ones we've been interrogating for almost a year) basically say Saddam didn't have any weapons.

ive never heard this. in fact ive heard the exact opposite. the reports that i have read stated that he has either barried them or moved them to syria, but never that he never had any to begin with.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
the mere fact they have ANY Sarin is terrifying.

Terrifying to you, chicken little. Let's recap. Terrorists disperse Sarin in Tokyo subway, 12 people die. Terrorists blow up conventional explosive in Moscow subway, 40 people die. Terrorists kill hundreds of GI's with roadside conventional IED's. Terrorists injure 2 GI's with Sarin.
 

Zephyr106

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
1,309
0
0
Originally posted by: josphII
Even his own scientists (the ones we've been interrogating for almost a year) basically say Saddam didn't have any weapons.

ive never heard this. in fact ive heard the exact opposite. the reports that i have read stated that he has either barried them or moved them to syria, but never that he never had any to begin with.

I heard a report that he moved his WMD to Israel.

Zephyr
 

josphII

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
1,490
0
0
The point of this war was to get rid of WMDs that were a threat to us.

news to me. i thought the point was to get rid of saddam, whom was a threat to peace around the world.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
bleat! bleat! bleat!

as i predicted..

"gee only one??, that doesn't count!!"

some of you have attacked me personally in this post.
for those of you i say Good Day
and recommend you go post in a Bush Hater thread, or better yet in a "feel good" thread about Kerry (a highly decorated Vietnam Veteran)

for the pinheads that hold the opinion that one artillery shell containing sarin doesn't count...
what complete drooling idiot believes that anyone would manufacture one binary nerve gas artillery shell? There most likely manufactured thousands.

the mere fact they have ANY Sarin is terrifying.
hey, but if your a liberal..a little Sarin is nothing....just read all the posts in this thread..
Grasp that straw HS:roll:
 

josphII

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
1,490
0
0
Originally posted by: Zephyr106
Originally posted by: josphII
Even his own scientists (the ones we've been interrogating for almost a year) basically say Saddam didn't have any weapons.

ive never heard this. in fact ive heard the exact opposite. the reports that i have read stated that he has either barried them or moved them to syria, but never that he never had any to begin with.

I heard a report that he moved his WMD to Israel.

Zephyr

funny?
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,489
0
0
Originally posted by: josphII
Even his own scientists (the ones we've been interrogating for almost a year) basically say Saddam didn't have any weapons.

ive never heard this. in fact ive heard the exact opposite. the reports that i have read stated that he has either barried them or moved them to syria, but never that he never had any to begin with.

Gazi George, a former Iraqi nuclear scientist under Saddam's regime, told Fox News that he believes many similar weapons stockpiled by the former regime were either buried underground or transported to Syria. He noted that the airport where the device was detonated is on the way to Baghdad from the Syrian border.

George said the finding likely will just be the first in a series of discoveries of such weapons.

"Saddam is the type who will not store those materials in a military warehouse. He's gonna store them either underground, or, as I said, lots of them have gone west to Syria and are being brought back with the insurgencies," George told Fox News. "It is difficult to look in areas that are not obvious to the military's eyes.

"I'm sure they're going to find more once time passes," he continued, saying one year is not enough for the survey group or the military to find the weapons.

Saddam, when he was in power, had declared that he did in fact possess mustard-gas filled artilleries but none that included sarin.
 

josphII

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
1,490
0
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
bleat! bleat! bleat!

as i predicted..

"gee only one??, that doesn't count!!"

some of you have attacked me personally in this post.
for those of you i say Good Day
and recommend you go post in a Bush Hater thread, or better yet in a "feel good" thread about Kerry (a highly decorated Vietnam Veteran)

for the pinheads that hold the opinion that one artillery shell containing sarin doesn't count...
what complete drooling idiot believes that anyone would manufacture one binary nerve gas artillery shell? There most likely manufactured thousands.

the mere fact they have ANY Sarin is terrifying.
hey, but if your a liberal..a little Sarin is nothing....just read all the posts in this thread..

but it doesnt matter because we only went over there because of oil! free saddam!!! [/liberal tirade]
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,709
8
81
Originally posted by: josphII
The point of this war was to get rid of WMDs that were a threat to us.

news to me. i thought the point was to get rid of saddam, whom was a threat to peace around the world.

Guess you missed out on Powell's speech to the UN
 

josphII

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
1,490
0
0
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: josphII
The point of this war was to get rid of WMDs that were a threat to us.

news to me. i thought the point was to get rid of saddam, whom was a threat to peace around the world.

Guess you missed out on Powell's speech to the UN

guess you've been comatose since '91
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: josphII
The point of this war was to get rid of WMDs that were a threat to us.

news to me. i thought the point was to get rid of saddam, whom was a threat to peace around the world.


No. That's what the administration wanted you to believe after it was clear Saddam didn't have any WMDs and that he certainly was not using them against the US.
 

sygyzy

Lifer
Oct 21, 2000
14,001
4
76
You call that a weapon of mass destruction?

I think Dennis Miller said it best on his interview with Leno last year. He said "You know what? I don't care anymore if they find WMD's anymore. Yeah, we don't care! Saddam is a mean man!"

That's like 12 year olds saying "Yeah, you know what? We didn't want to win that championship game anyway. Sure we worked all year for it, but winning is everything. As long as we played good"

What BS is that? First you use it as *the* primary reason for war and now you act as if it wasn't important anymore? WMD? HA!
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
Terrifying to you, chicken little. Let's recap. Terrorists disperse Sarin in Tokyo subway, 12 people die. Terrorists blow up conventional explosive in Moscow subway, 40 people die. Terrorists kill hundreds of GI's with roadside conventional IED's. Terrorists injure 2 GI's with Sarin.

yep..what's a few dead bodies here and there if your a liberal.....
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Terrifying to you, chicken little. Let's recap. Terrorists disperse Sarin in Tokyo subway, 12 people die. Terrorists blow up conventional explosive in Moscow subway, 40 people die. Terrorists kill hundreds of GI's with roadside conventional IED's. Terrorists injure 2 GI's with Sarin.

yep..what's a few dead bodies here and there if your a liberal.....
Seems to me it's the Liberals who are complaining about the deaths more than the Myopic Neocons
 

josphII

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
1,490
0
0
Originally posted by: sygyzy
You call that a weapon of mass destruction?

I think Dennis Miller said it best on his interview with Leno last year. He said "You know what? I don't care anymore if they find WMD's anymore. Yeah, we don't care! Saddam is a mean man!"

That's like 12 year olds saying "Yeah, you know what? We didn't want to win that championship game anyway. Sure we worked all year for it, but winning is everything. As long as we played good"

What BS is that? First you use it as *the* primary reason for war and now you act as if it wasn't important anymore? WMD? HA!

you commie-libs have it backwards. a better analogy would the 2000 election where the republicans are clearly in the right but the liberals cry spilt milk over some far fetched b.s.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Terrifying to you, chicken little. Let's recap. Terrorists disperse Sarin in Tokyo subway, 12 people die. Terrorists blow up conventional explosive in Moscow subway, 40 people die. Terrorists kill hundreds of GI's with roadside conventional IED's. Terrorists injure 2 GI's with Sarin.

yep..what's a few dead bodies here and there if your a liberal.....

Fine, continue to justify losing 500 GI's, hundreds of billions, and getting bogged down in Iraq with a sarin shell.
If I had to pick between a conventional artillery shell or a sarin gas shell exploding in my proximity, I know what I would pick.
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
Originally posted by: Passions
HAHAHHAHAHA FINALLY!! Suck it down liberals. Bush was right all along. HAHAHAHHAHAHA.

OMG, That was awesome! Passions, you're the best!
 

Zephyr106

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
1,309
0
0
Originally posted by: josphII
Originally posted by: Zephyr106
Originally posted by: josphII
Even his own scientists (the ones we've been interrogating for almost a year) basically say Saddam didn't have any weapons.

ive never heard this. in fact ive heard the exact opposite. the reports that i have read stated that he has either barried them or moved them to syria, but never that he never had any to begin with.

I heard a report that he moved his WMD to Israel.

Zephyr

funny?

My claim has as much credibility as a Newsmax claim about WMD transfer to Syria. But I forgot, we mustn't joke about Dear Israel.

Zephyr
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Alas, there is nothing funny about Israel having WMDs. They are a theocracy armed with nuclear weapons. The US should be doing something about it instead of giving Israel more money.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
Wow, at what point do people consider the WMD a legitimate reason? If this road side 155mm shell was used then where did they get it? And where are the rest of them?

If we find even a teaspoon of WMD in Iraq then that is enough for me. What if this thing went off in a new york subway? I would expect more and more of these things to be used if they are out there.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
I found this rather interesting

They believe the mustard gas shell may have been one of 550 projectiles for which former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein failed to account when he made his weapons declaration shortly before Operation Iraqi Freedom began last year. Iraq also failed to then account for 450 aerial bombs with mustard gas. That, combined with the shells, totaled about 80 tons of unaccounted for mustard gas.



80 tons of mustard gas that was unaccounted for by Saddam. That doesnt even count the VX and Sarin gas he had.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,489
0
0
Originally posted by: chrisms
There isn't any proof that this was produced in Iraq by Saddam Hussein.

So then where did it come from? Syria? Iran? What other countries are wandering around Iraq dropping 115MM artillery rounds and putting little signs on them saying "use me for an IED!"

:roll:

squirm squirm squirm.
 

josphII

Banned
Nov 24, 2001
1,490
0
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Alas, there is nothing funny about Israel having WMDs. They are a theocracy armed with nuclear weapons. The US should be doing something about it instead of giving Israel more money.

do something about what? the only thing keeping isreal from being invaded by numerous other arab countries is the fact that they have nuclear weapons. but all jews are evil and must die, right infohawk??
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |