Unaccounted for means it would still exist, just has not been found.
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: SmokeRngs
You do realize that everything you posted there validates and strengthens my argument don't you? It does not say that it no longer exists, it does say it's unaccounted for. Unaccounted for means it would still exist, just has not been found.
I must thank you for proving yourself wrong.
Wow. You prove yourself to be more ignorant with each new post! Amazing!
How in *the* hell does unaccounted for equate to existing? Hmmm?? Care to define the [ill]logic behind that thought process?
Nice comeback. Doesn't address anything I said, of course, but at least it isn't as diversionary as your usual responses.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Hi Bowfinger.
CkG
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Nice comeback. Doesn't address anything I said, of course, but at least it isn't as diversionary as your usual responses.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Hi Bowfinger.
CkG
We'll just leave it at the indisputable fact: Bush and his minions lied about Iraq's WMDs, and the discovery of one artillery shell is neither surprising nor significant.
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: SmokeRngs
You do realize that everything you posted there validates and strengthens my argument don't you? It does not say that it no longer exists, it does say it's unaccounted for. Unaccounted for means it would still exist, just has not been found.
I must thank you for proving yourself wrong.
Wow. You prove yourself to be more ignorant with each new post! Amazing!
How in *the* hell does unaccounted for equate to existing? Hmmm?? Care to define the [ill]logic behind that thought process?
Ummmm, not really.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
The mustard gas and Sarin ARE serious - despite the attempts of some to shove it off in a corner. Our troops are over there dealing with IEDs everyday. The fact that we found one that contained chemical weapons is VERY serious to those who may be exposed to them. I
CkG
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: SmokeRngs
You do realize that everything you posted there validates and strengthens my argument don't you? It does not say that it no longer exists, it does say it's unaccounted for. Unaccounted for means it would still exist, just has not been found.
I must thank you for proving yourself wrong.
Wow. You prove yourself to be more ignorant with each new post! Amazing!
How in *the* hell does unaccounted for equate to existing? Hmmm?? Care to define the [ill]logic behind that thought process?
The mustard gas and Sarin ARE serious - despite the attempts of some to shove it off in a corner. Our troops are over there dealing with IEDs everyday. The fact that we found one that contained chemical weapons is VERY serious to those who may be exposed to them
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Ummmm, not really.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
The mustard gas and Sarin ARE serious - despite the attempts of some to shove it off in a corner. Our troops are over there dealing with IEDs everyday. The fact that we found one that contained chemical weapons is VERY serious to those who may be exposed to them. I
CkG
First off the mustard gas is not serious as it was completely inert based on reports on FoxNews.com yesterday. Secondly the Sarin is serious, however they really have no idea how much was in that artillery shell. The shell could hold 3-5 liters, but only a small trace was released when it was detonated. I believe earlier today, FoxNews.com was reporting the artillery shell was unmarked and very old. Who knows what the origin of the Sarin was.
I have a really hard time believing you and/or any of the pro-war fanatics around here would point to this very small find and say the pre-war claims of massive stockpiles of WMDs, etc. were justified. But maybe you and your kind are grasping at straws more than I would imagine. I'm sure you'll prove that to be the case, so please, go right ahead . . .
Originally posted by: arsbanned
The mustard gas and Sarin ARE serious - despite the attempts of some to shove it off in a corner. Our troops are over there dealing with IEDs everyday. The fact that we found one that contained chemical weapons is VERY serious to those who may be exposed to them
Link to report regarding soldiers affected by it? According to any news I've seen on the subject, everyone involved (the military in Iraq) totally downplayed it. Are they lying? That wouldn't surprise me.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: SmokeRngs
You do realize that everything you posted there validates and strengthens my argument don't you? It does not say that it no longer exists, it does say it's unaccounted for. Unaccounted for means it would still exist, just has not been found.
I must thank you for proving yourself wrong.
Wow. You prove yourself to be more ignorant with each new post! Amazing!
How in *the* hell does unaccounted for equate to existing? Hmmm?? Care to define the [ill]logic behind that thought process?
Unaccounted for may not directly equal "existing", but it's demise/location was not appropriately recorded. Does "unaccounted for" equal "destroyed" in your opinion?
CkG
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: SmokeRngs
You do realize that everything you posted there validates and strengthens my argument don't you? It does not say that it no longer exists, it does say it's unaccounted for. Unaccounted for means it would still exist, just has not been found.
I must thank you for proving yourself wrong.
Wow. You prove yourself to be more ignorant with each new post! Amazing!
How in *the* hell does unaccounted for equate to existing? Hmmm?? Care to define the [ill]logic behind that thought process?
Unaccounted for may not directly equal "existing", but it's demise/location was not appropriately recorded. Does "unaccounted for" equal "destroyed" in your opinion?
CkG
No, it doesn't. Never said it did.
However, that unknown is certainly not enough justification to invade another country!
an binary artillery shell containing Sarin Nerve gas was detonated today in Iraq in a terrorist attack on U.S. troops. Two G.I.'s were exposed and treated.
gee....i thought all you liberals claimed they didn't exist..
i already know what you're going to claim..
"they only found one?...that doesn't count.."
well, does any rational person believe they produced only one Sarin Gas artillery shell?
no WMD?
Ha.
Nonsense. You have nothing you can say. We all know Iraq had WMDs in the past. The discovery of an old artillery shell is therefore not surprising. It is also NOT significant with respect to Bush administration grandiose claims. The simple, obvious, indisputable fact remains that Bush and his minions lied about Iraq's WMDs.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Nice comeback. Doesn't address anything I said, of course, but at least it isn't as diversionary as your usual responses.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Hi Bowfinger.
CkG
We'll just leave it at the indisputable fact: Bush and his minions lied about Iraq's WMDs, and the discovery of one artillery shell is neither surprising nor significant.
Buahahahaha!!!! If you want to resume the pissing match - I'm game, and you know I won't hold back. I figured I'd be nice and end the spat there - however if you wish to resume it -be my guest.
The mustard gas and Sarin ARE serious - despite the attempts of some to shove it off in a corner. Our troops are over there dealing with IEDs everyday. The fact that we found one that contained chemical weapons is VERY serious to those who may be exposed to them. I
CkG
? Do you have a clue? I was talking about IEDs since you didn't seem to notice that. Coalition soldiers are exposed to these IEDs on a daily basis and having one that contained chemical agents is quite serious.
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
[Nonsense. You have nothing you can say. We all know Iraq had WMDs in the past. The discovery of an old artillery shell is therefore not surprising. It is also NOT significant with respect to Bush administration grandiose claims. The simple, obvious, indisputable fact remains that Bush and his minions lied about Iraq's WMDs.
There's also nothing you can say re. your inability to accept that there is a difference between "not-Bush" and liberal. That's the fatal weakness of the YABAs. They cannot be objective about King George or their opponents.
Quintessential Cad. Dodge, divert, distort. Glad to see you haven't lost your touch. It's always easier to debate someone when you put words in my mouth and invent your own definitions for terms. Let me know if you ever decide to address the points I actually raised.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
[Nonsense. You have nothing you can say. We all know Iraq had WMDs in the past. The discovery of an old artillery shell is therefore not surprising. It is also NOT significant with respect to Bush administration grandiose claims. The simple, obvious, indisputable fact remains that Bush and his minions lied about Iraq's WMDs.
There's also nothing you can say re. your inability to accept that there is a difference between "not-Bush" and liberal. That's the fatal weakness of the YABAs. They cannot be objective about King George or their opponents.
Hogwash I said this was serious -and it is - especially to those that deal with IEDs(which is what contained the chemical agents) on a daily basis.
Sure, this may not 100% mitigate the world wide intel failures regarding Saddams WMDs and such, but it can't be brushed of an "nothing" either.
Well, considering you and others toss around "neo-con", "minions", and "bushies" I don't see where you can take issue with someone calling you on your attempt at trying to portray yourself as just a voter who doesn't have partisanship. Your supposed objectivity has long been compromised, as hatred for Bush and what he stands for has blinded you. Your constant partisan bleatings have more than proven that you aren't as "independent" as you try to claim. Atleast I am comfortable with my ideology and can proudly say I am a Conservative Republican, but it's sad to see those on the left struggle to come to grips with their ideology and party. "Liberal" and/or "democrat" aren't "dirty" words last time I checked -why is it that some wish to shy away from them then?
CkG
Get in line. He still has to fess up to being a bigot.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Quintessential Cad. Dodge, divert, distort. Glad to see you haven't lost your touch. It's always easier to debate someone when you put words in my mouth and invent your own definitions for terms. Let me know if you ever decide to address the points I actually raised.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
[Nonsense. You have nothing you can say. We all know Iraq had WMDs in the past. The discovery of an old artillery shell is therefore not surprising. It is also NOT significant with respect to Bush administration grandiose claims. The simple, obvious, indisputable fact remains that Bush and his minions lied about Iraq's WMDs.
There's also nothing you can say re. your inability to accept that there is a difference between "not-Bush" and liberal. That's the fatal weakness of the YABAs. They cannot be objective about King George or their opponents.
Hogwash I said this was serious -and it is - especially to those that deal with IEDs(which is what contained the chemical agents) on a daily basis.
Sure, this may not 100% mitigate the world wide intel failures regarding Saddams WMDs and such, but it can't be brushed of an "nothing" either.
Well, considering you and others toss around "neo-con", "minions", and "bushies" I don't see where you can take issue with someone calling you on your attempt at trying to portray yourself as just a voter who doesn't have partisanship. Your supposed objectivity has long been compromised, as hatred for Bush and what he stands for has blinded you. Your constant partisan bleatings have more than proven that you aren't as "independent" as you try to claim. Atleast I am comfortable with my ideology and can proudly say I am a Conservative Republican, but it's sad to see those on the left struggle to come to grips with their ideology and party. "Liberal" and/or "democrat" aren't "dirty" words last time I checked -why is it that some wish to shy away from them then?
CkG
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Quintessential Cad. Dodge, divert, distort. Glad to see you haven't lost your touch. It's always easier to debate someone when you put words in my mouth and invent your own definitions for terms. Let me know if you ever decide to address the points I actually raised.
You raised some points?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Let me know if you ever decide to address the points I actually raised.
Originally posted by: Format C:
You raised some points?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Let me know if you ever decide to address the points I actually raised.
You had it exactly right CkG. There was only trace amounts of Sarin detected because the precursors never mixed properly. Had they have had the chance to do so the Liblets would then be pissing and screaming because of the death toll, and blaming Bush for it of course. From what I've seen of the Liblets lately I'm convinced that were a nuke to explode in Baghdad their first reponse would be, "well it was only one city, and besides that its our fault anyway."
Originally posted by: josphII
thats because saddam is the commie-libs hero. FREE SADDAM!!!
Originally posted by: josphII
Originally posted by: Format C:
You raised some points?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Let me know if you ever decide to address the points I actually raised.
You had it exactly right CkG. There was only trace amounts of Sarin detected because the precursors never mixed properly. Had they have had the chance to do so the Liblets would then be pissing and screaming because of the death toll, and blaming Bush for it of course. From what I've seen of the Liblets lately I'm convinced that were a nuke to explode in Baghdad their first reponse would be, "well it was only one city, and besides that its our fault anyway."
thats because saddam is the commie-libs hero. FREE SADDAM!!!
Since you insist on trolling enjoy a week away from the forums