How come the OP link directs to a different link than the text label implies?
Anyway, the actual CBS story is as clear as mud. For example it emphasises the guy had a blood level a bit above what would be allowed for driving - well, er, so what? He wasn't driving. The dangerous element of driving while under the influence is the car not the substance! That's why for all substances society is quite strict about even modest impairments of reaction time and concentration. That's a long way from the behavior described in the report.
It also just says 'its linked' to the weed consumption because it occurred soon after it. But you could link things to coffee consumption or watching TV on that basis.
I don't partake in any of this stuff myself, but I will never cease to be cynical about the double-standards applied to different forms of harmful substances (though in my view 'the car' is the worst of the lot! It kills hundreds of thousands every year, and entire societies seem to get dependent on it!)
Anyway, the actual CBS story is as clear as mud. For example it emphasises the guy had a blood level a bit above what would be allowed for driving - well, er, so what? He wasn't driving. The dangerous element of driving while under the influence is the car not the substance! That's why for all substances society is quite strict about even modest impairments of reaction time and concentration. That's a long way from the behavior described in the report.
It also just says 'its linked' to the weed consumption because it occurred soon after it. But you could link things to coffee consumption or watching TV on that basis.
I don't partake in any of this stuff myself, but I will never cease to be cynical about the double-standards applied to different forms of harmful substances (though in my view 'the car' is the worst of the lot! It kills hundreds of thousands every year, and entire societies seem to get dependent on it!)