Originally posted by: ja1484
The entire point I have been getting at is:
What is the point of being able to lift a heavier weight under specialized conditions if it confers no functional benefits to you in the field? In other words, if you can only lift said resistance in a gym environment with straps, what improvement have you made, other than to be able to spank about your weight totals to like minded in-gym-wonders?
why, if you claim to be so knowledgeable about lifting, can you not accept that there are other motivations for lifting besides "practical" uses of strength? let me list them again:
1. improved health
2. weight loss
3. better sleep (dunno about research, but i sleep like a baby on days i lift)
4. better looks
5. self confidence
6. stress relief
7. injury prevention (yes, obviously this only applies if you have proper form)
and even if we *are* discussing "practicality", you do realize that there are many "functional" benefits from a stronger back, even if the grip lags behind? two simple examples:
1. many of the motions (blocking, for example) in football involve back strength, but have little to no bearing on grip strength.
2. same argument applies boxing, where most of your power comes from your core, and a strong back is essential, while a strong grip is irrelevant
i'm sure you can come up with MANY more where a stronger back is very useful and grip strength is not necessary. Having said that, i AM NOT saying that grip strength isn't important or useful. Moreover, I've mentioned several times that I AM improving my grip strength. but it will be a LONG time before it catches up to my back (if ever) and i don't want to halt my back workouts because of that.
Originally posted by: ja1484
Well, yes, and like you, they seem to be more intent on moving the bar for ego rather than to improve their abilities or health.
yes, you're absolutely right. i'm so glad you could share your divine analysis of me based on your deep understanding of my psyche. :roll:
of all the rubbish you've posted in this thread, this is the most unnecessary, unfounded and discrediting to any "expertise" you may claim.
Originally posted by: ja1484
Remember: If you have to use straps to lift you, you aren't lifting it unassisted...to put it more basically, you aren't lifting the weight.
you're right! the straps are also fitted with magical anti-gravity devices that lift that weight for me! and when i wear boxing gloves to protect my knuckles, i'm not really actually the one hitting the bag, the gloves are!
Originally posted by: ja1484
While it's true that functional training is superior to all others for a given activity, it's hardly accurate to say that weightlifting doesn't result in practical strength when done properly. Proper resistance over the course of the proper volume and with multijoint, load bearing exercises shows wonderful results in improving people's functional abilities overall.
What you're trying to say is that a split system of training, more favored by bodybuilders and power lifters, is not the best method to build practical strength, and on that I agree with you.
well, obviously being stronger, healthier, etc is going to have practical benefits. but as i said before:
1. practical ability is not the only motivation for weight lifting
2. if practical ability is your motivation, there are far better ways of achieving it
3. you can gain practical abilities from weight lifting even if your grip is weaker than your deadlift
Originally posted by: ja1484
It's a component to all these, debatably. "Better sleeping" and "Self Confidence" are still highly debated in the literature, and injury prevention only really applies when muscle groups are kept in proportion to one another. Imbalances, especially of antagonistic muscle groups, are a huge source of arthritic, inflammatory, and other forms of orthopaedic pain.
i hope you're not dumb enough to be arguing that the *only* benefit of weight lifting is "practical" strength. it's like saying the *only* benefit of jogging is that it allows you to run away from the cops better.
as for injury prevention, there are two sides to it:
1. preventing injury WHILE lifting. this involves proper form/technique and straps, IMO, have no bearing on my deadlift.
2. preventing injury BECAUSE you lift. this means that your back doesn't get injured when you lift that refrigerator because your muscles are well trained.
Originally posted by: ja1484
If you can't lift a given weight without the help of another device, nature is trying to tell you you've got a weak link in the chain.
you know, i can't run very far without shoes either, because my feet get torn up and my knees start to hurt. i suppose you could say nature is telling me i shouldn't run until my feet callous over and my knees explode... but of course, i could also get a good pair of running shoes that absorb all the impact...
Originally posted by: ja1484
Buy chalk, as KoolDrew said. Or don't. But deadlift without straps is a wonderful addition to your grip training regimen, and you really should consider it.
Remember: Training with straps, braces, or other assistive equipment is pretty much just accepting a weakness rather than working to improve it.
Your call.
again, you are refusing to read. let me try again, really slowly, just for you:
1. i currently deadlift without straps, so don't talk about it being a "wonderful addition"
2. i have reached a weight where this is becoming too much for my grip
3. despite training my grip, i think this trend will only become more extreme - that is, my back will continue to outpace my grip
4. i AM working on this weakness but i don't want it to limit development in other areas