I think you guys are automatically approved for Statehood if you ask. I remember reading that somewhere.
Smart move. Territory status is the way to go, no income taxes.No thanks.
Somehow I don't think that's what we'll end up with. If the govt. follows through on their vote reform plans it will most likely end up being some type of ranked ballot system.
Smart move. Territory status is the way to go, no income taxes.
Ranked ballt is stupid too. I would go with merged districts. Say six electoral district, each person get six votes tp distributes they see fit. Then I can vote for top candidates from all three parties should they put out one good one each.
I think you guys are automatically approved for Statehood if you ask. I remember reading that somewhere.
Half of it is 0bama debt and that means it's necessary and good debt. How in the world can people even forget this?Yeah no. No way are we assuming your debt. And your crazy gun right.
Half of it is 0bama debt and that means it's necessary and good debt. How in the world can people even forget this?
Boomerang's huddled within a bubble of alternative facts since long before it became trendy. To quote Saint Ronnie, "The problem with our [ conservative ] friends is not that they're ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so."Obama debt ?
Wow, that's a real stretch.
Keep on going with the spam dude.
Half of it is 0bama debt and that means it's necessary and good debt. How in the world can people even forget this?
Even the weighted Electorate College votes did not seem accurate to me, just more speculation, but I did not bother commenting on it at the time.
On reality they should have 1 based on population, but that is another problem with the EC, 2 is the minimum.
The EC awards a minimum above what it should be, even if adjusted.
A state could have 2 people living in it and it would technically be eligible for 2 EC votes.
More twisted stats that mean nothing.
Too complex, I still say popular vote should equal the winner. I've felt this way before this last election too.
I understand the point that there will be pockets that never get attention however with TV, Social Media they'll do fine does anyone care if a Candidate visits their State anyways? The argument that some people will simply never vote isn't any different from now where if you are a hard core conservative in MA or CA your vote doesn't matter, same with a hard core liberal in TX or AL. I don't like how our system encourages extremes, I do feel if your vote is that fringe maybe its time to look at your next best option that has a chance of winning.
Imagine the chaos that would happen if there is an election where nobody makes it to 270 and Congress decides. This alone should cause people to act.
Some people don't seem to have a problem with that, since city-folk aren't "real Americans"™.It makes people voting in metro areas votes mean less on an order of degree.
Some people don't seem to have a problem with that, since city-folk aren't "real Americans"™.
Some people don't seem to have a problem with that, since city-folk aren't "real Americans"™.
Gotta give credit where credit is due. You are evidently exponentially brighter than some of your besties because you're not in denial that 0bama nearly doubled our debt.Constant diversion, huh? Obama's predecessor also doubled the debt in a different way- with military adventurism & tax cuts for people who don't need tax cuts. It's also part of how Repubs managed to overheat & crash the economy, too.
Gotta give credit where credit is due. You are evidently exponentially brighter than some of your besties because you're not in denial that 0bama nearly doubled our debt.
As for the rest of your post, it's just more expressions of fear based in impotency that we're becoming accustomed to. I'll not comment on any of that because it's something each of you will have to work through on your own.
Nice little backpedal there, adding the word "nearly". In fact, it is about 40%. (Note that even this 40% includes over $2 trillion due to the continuing expenses of Bush's wars.) In contrast, Bush 43 actually did double the national debt, and Reagan nearly tripled it (~180%).Gotta give credit where credit is due. You are evidently exponentially brighter than some of your besties because you're not in denial that 0bama nearly doubled our debt.
Gotta give credit where credit is due. You are evidently exponentially brighter than some of your besties because you're not in denial that 0bama nearly doubled our debt.
As for the rest of your post, it's just more expressions of fear based in impotency that we're becoming accustomed to. I'll not comment on any of that because it's something each of you will have to work through on your own.
Gotta give credit where credit is due. You are evidently exponentially brighter than some of your besties because you're not in denial that 0bama nearly doubled our debt.
As for the rest of your post, it's just more expressions of fear based in impotency that we're becoming accustomed to. I'll not comment on any of that because it's something each of you will have to work through on your own.
Nice little backpedal there, adding the word "nearly". In fact, it is about 40%. (Note that even this 40% includes over $2 trillion due to the continuing expenses of Bush's wars.) In contrast, Bush 43 actually did double the national debt, and Reagan nearly tripled it (~180%).
Edit: Oops, wrong pedal.
Not as much as it irks Trump that he lost the popular vote and now wants to delegitimize it. Why do you throw stones while living in a glass house, Lando?Sorta like those on the left constantly remind everyone that Clinton won the popular vote, guess it's must be so under their skin it's on their bones.
Half of it is 0bama debt and that means it's necessary and good debt. How in the world can people even forget this?
The Churches and Mosques in my town have been getting prepared to receive American refugees
There has been a little opposition from those who think Americans are too violent to co-exist here though