You're certainly no cosmologist.
Agreed. Nor have I asserted that I am. One does not have to be cosmologist to wonder about fundamental questions of the universe.
Do you know another reliable method for producing objective answers to questions about reality?
Would you ever acknowledge the possibility that perhaps there are some questions science cannot answer?
It doesn't appear to have sprung from anything. Where in our history has the universe ever not existed?
Where in my musings did I limit my consideration to the infinitesimally small period of time that is human history?
No, they most certainly do not.
The first law of thermodynamics essentially states that energy can be changed from one form to another, but it cannot be created or destroyed. If that law is true, all matter, energy, etc. in the universe had to come from somewhere.
What makes you think they came from somewhere? You own inability to rationalize any other possibility?
Ah. I see we have branched off into the realm of opini . . . . er . . . philosophy. Are you going to start quoting Locke and Socrates now?
Are you arguing that the universe came from nothing, because the universe does not exist?
Edit - nevermind. I take from your sig that you are a solipsist. If that is true, why does it matter to you that I am not a cosmologist, or that I have any thoughts whatsoever? The only thing real is your mind, right?
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. You, a person who believes that only his mind exists, is having an argument on the internet about the existence of
god (of all things). And you are having that argument with someone that your own belief dictates
does not exist, but whom your mind believes
to exist. Oh the delicious irony.