Originally posted by: iamwiz82
How much do you want for it?
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Why not? The 32 valve version was a very nice engine, though quite wide. And the 24 valve version in the new Mustang is a very nice piece of work.Originally posted by: iamwiz82
And I dont like the 4.6
I'll definitely admit that the 16 valve 4.6 engines were nothing special, but the newer iterations are quite strong.
ZV
I was referencing Factory Five kits. Like you said, the 2v engines were nothing, and those are the only ones priced well enough for me to think about dismantling. Not to mention, the 4v is a tight fit. But, wow, does it scream.
Do you use the chassis from the donor car with the factory five kit? Or do you just use the drivetrain?
Drivetrain mainly, also suspension pieces and steering. The chassis and everything is built by FFR.
Like some others have already said, the laws of physics are pretty reliable on the road.Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: shortylickens
I had a 2002 Mazda 5, till I got hit by a V10 Econoline at 10 MPH and my entire front end disintegrated. Those little asian cars might seem nice and efficient, until you get hit.
Now I have a 2003 chevy S10 three-door. The interior isnt nearly as nice and the thing is a gas hog, but I want to at least survive a minor accident.
I used to work in the rental car industry and the Japanese cars (Toyotas anyway) were very very good in collisions. I remember seeing a Corolla of ours after getting hit head on by a van at around 40mph and the passenger compartment was still intact and the occupants were not injured badly. I saw a Hyundia that was hit in front and from behind and the passenger compartment on that car was completely destroyed...especially the rear seat. I don't know what the impact speed was but I would not have wanted to be in that car in a collision.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Why not? The 32 valve version was a very nice engine, though quite wide. And the 24 valve version in the new Mustang is a very nice piece of work.Originally posted by: iamwiz82
And I dont like the 4.6
I'll definitely admit that the 16 valve 4.6 engines were nothing special, but the newer iterations are quite strong.
ZV
I was referencing Factory Five kits. Like you said, the 2v engines were nothing, and those are the only ones priced well enough for me to think about dismantling. Not to mention, the 4v is a tight fit. But, wow, does it scream.
Do you use the chassis from the donor car with the factory five kit? Or do you just use the drivetrain?
Drivetrain mainly, also suspension pieces and steering. The chassis and everything is built by FFR.
What would that set you back when completed? I like the idea, just seems like it would be a huge money pit. It would be fun to buy a race motor and drop it in that car though.
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Like some others have already said, the laws of physics are pretty reliable on the road.Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: shortylickens
I had a 2002 Mazda 5, till I got hit by a V10 Econoline at 10 MPH and my entire front end disintegrated. Those little asian cars might seem nice and efficient, until you get hit.
Now I have a 2003 chevy S10 three-door. The interior isnt nearly as nice and the thing is a gas hog, but I want to at least survive a minor accident.
I used to work in the rental car industry and the Japanese cars (Toyotas anyway) were very very good in collisions. I remember seeing a Corolla of ours after getting hit head on by a van at around 40mph and the passenger compartment was still intact and the occupants were not injured badly. I saw a Hyundia that was hit in front and from behind and the passenger compartment on that car was completely destroyed...especially the rear seat. I don't know what the impact speed was but I would not have wanted to be in that car in a collision.
I dont know what they got hit with at 40 miles an hour, but an Econoline at 10 probably matches or exceeds them.
I'm not knocking mazdas at all. They are a great deal for the money and pretty nice too. I just dont want another one when I consider the fact I drive with other people on the road. If it were only my road I would take another little japanese car in a second.
(Interesting side note, I heard that when you buy a BMW, the road suddenly becomes yours. )
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/wolf56/bmw.html
Originally posted by: shortylickens
As for M4H, I respect your opinion but its utter bunk. The car disintegrating did not save my life. The air bags didnt even deploy, which makes me question Mazdas safety design a little.
My life was saved by only being hit at 10 miles per hour. Had it been anything more who know if I would be here today, annoying the crap out of you.
Originally posted by: shortylickens
Like some others have already said, the laws of physics are pretty reliable on the road.Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: shortylickens
I had a 2002 Mazda 5, till I got hit by a V10 Econoline at 10 MPH and my entire front end disintegrated. Those little asian cars might seem nice and efficient, until you get hit.
Now I have a 2003 chevy S10 three-door. The interior isnt nearly as nice and the thing is a gas hog, but I want to at least survive a minor accident.
I used to work in the rental car industry and the Japanese cars (Toyotas anyway) were very very good in collisions. I remember seeing a Corolla of ours after getting hit head on by a van at around 40mph and the passenger compartment was still intact and the occupants were not injured badly. I saw a Hyundia that was hit in front and from behind and the passenger compartment on that car was completely destroyed...especially the rear seat. I don't know what the impact speed was but I would not have wanted to be in that car in a collision.
I dont know what they got hit with at 40 miles an hour, but an Econoline at 10 probably matches or exceeds them.
I'm not knocking mazdas at all. They are a great deal for the money and pretty nice too. I just dont want another one when I consider the fact I drive with other people on the road. If it were only my road I would take another little japanese car in a second.
(Interesting side note, I heard that when you buy a BMW, the road suddenly becomes yours. )
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/wolf56/bmw.html
Originally posted by: Ryan
LoL - so says the man who speaks of physics. A geo metro going 40mph is going to cause more damage than an Econoline at 10.
Originally posted by: dug777
1989 Mazda 323 5 door hatch (5speed manual)
Utterly reliable, not a speck of rust, and very comfortable, albeit somewhat underpowered and not entirely frugal with the petrol...
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Why not? The 32 valve version was a very nice engine, though quite wide. And the 24 valve version in the new Mustang is a very nice piece of work.Originally posted by: iamwiz82
And I dont like the 4.6
I'll definitely admit that the 16 valve 4.6 engines were nothing special, but the newer iterations are quite strong.
ZV
I was referencing Factory Five kits. Like you said, the 2v engines were nothing, and those are the only ones priced well enough for me to think about dismantling. Not to mention, the 4v is a tight fit. But, wow, does it scream.